Is COVID-19 threatening electoral democracy in Uganda? Readiness to accept “scientific voting” (electronic voting) amidst the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Digital Policy Regulation and Governance Pub Date : 2021-08-26 DOI:10.1108/dprg-01-2021-0025
Peter Dithan Ntale, Muhammed Ngoma
{"title":"Is COVID-19 threatening electoral democracy in Uganda? Readiness to accept “scientific voting” (electronic voting) amidst the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Peter Dithan Ntale, Muhammed Ngoma","doi":"10.1108/dprg-01-2021-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to assess the readiness of Ugandans to accept electronic voting under the restrictive conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA semi-structured questionnaire, built on a five-point-Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 – strongly disagree to 5 – strongly agree was used to get quantifiable data from four main electoral stakeholders i.e. the policymakers, urban and semi-urban youth, rural voters and government officials. These stakeholders were purposively and conveniently selected because of the influential roles they play in promoting electoral democracy in Uganda. Using a cross-sectional survey design, the authors adopted correlational and quantitative research designs to collect and analyse data. Data was collected from a maximum sample size of 384 as recommended by Krejcie and Morgan (1970) from which 252 useful responses (65.6% response rate) were obtained. Using a statistical package for social scientists version 21.0, the authors performed a Pearson correlation coefficient to determine the relationships between study variables and linear regression analysis to predict the readiness of the stakeholders to accept e-voting more especially under the constraints caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.\n\n\nFindings\nThere was a positive significant relationship between perceived usefulness (PU) and attitude towards adoption, perceived ease of use and attitude towards adoption, attitude and readiness and finally trust propensity and readiness. The regression results show that 65% of the variations in readiness to adopt e-voting can be explained by perceived ease of use, PU, trust propensity and attitude towards adoption. Attitude towards adopting e-voting accounts for the highest variations in the model followed by trust propensity and finally PU. However, perceived ease of use was found to be insignificant.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study was limited to only PU, perceived ease of use, trust propensity, attitudes towards using/adoption and readiness to accept e-voting amidst the COVID-19 strict conditions. In Africa, electoral democracy can be influenced by a number of factors such as finances, education levels, sectarianism, voter rigging, perceived risk, political and economic environment. These were not taken into consideration yet they would affect the stakeholders’ attitudes and perceptions which would directly or indirectly affect the adoption of electronic voting.\n\n\nPractical implications\nGiven the low levels of technology infrastructure in the country, there is a general low uptake of technology-oriented systems. The internet reach is low and quality is poor whilst the radio and televisions network is limited to a few urban settings, poor quality technology systems such as the recently acquired voter biometric systems and the constant government actions to switch off the internet and social media whenever there are contentious political issues. These inadequacies together with the restrictive COVID-19 conditions have compromised the participation of stakeholders which dents the stakeholders’ readiness to accept e-voting which consequently compromises electoral democracy in the country. Therefore, government, electoral observers, the international community and civil society organizations need to accelerate the technology infrastructure development in the country, training and development of technical skills and competences, as well as mass mobilization on the use of technology-oriented platforms aimed at promoting electoral democracy. The country should come up with ICT policies and regulations that encourage the use of ICT in areas that promote democracy. These may include; the use of an easy e-voting system such as emails and voting via the post office. Also, Lawmakers, civil society organizations and the international community should make it punitive for anyone who disenfranchises people through internet disconnection, denial of access to broadcast, print and online media. These interventions will restore peoples’ attitudes and perceptions towards electronic voting, consequently increasing their levels of participation in the electioneering process.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe Ministry of Health, the Uganda Police Force and other security agencies have come out strongly to enforce the COVID-19 standard operating procedures which among others include the banning of political gatherings, processions and meetings of any kind. As a remedy, the Electoral Commission is encouraging political parties, electoral candidates, voters and other stakeholders to use technology-oriented systems such as mobile phones, broadcast and print media, the internet and others to reach out to the electorate. With the government in full control of all these electronic, print and broadcast media, having previously switched them off during the 2011 and 2016 polls consequently disenfranchising many people from their democratic rights, it remains unknown the extent to which the electorate is ready to accept and appreciate scientific voting more so during this time when restrictions against COVID-19 are not making it any better for the voters and other key participants to carry out their political and civil activities.\n","PeriodicalId":56357,"journal":{"name":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-01-2021-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the readiness of Ugandans to accept electronic voting under the restrictive conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design/methodology/approach A semi-structured questionnaire, built on a five-point-Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 – strongly disagree to 5 – strongly agree was used to get quantifiable data from four main electoral stakeholders i.e. the policymakers, urban and semi-urban youth, rural voters and government officials. These stakeholders were purposively and conveniently selected because of the influential roles they play in promoting electoral democracy in Uganda. Using a cross-sectional survey design, the authors adopted correlational and quantitative research designs to collect and analyse data. Data was collected from a maximum sample size of 384 as recommended by Krejcie and Morgan (1970) from which 252 useful responses (65.6% response rate) were obtained. Using a statistical package for social scientists version 21.0, the authors performed a Pearson correlation coefficient to determine the relationships between study variables and linear regression analysis to predict the readiness of the stakeholders to accept e-voting more especially under the constraints caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings There was a positive significant relationship between perceived usefulness (PU) and attitude towards adoption, perceived ease of use and attitude towards adoption, attitude and readiness and finally trust propensity and readiness. The regression results show that 65% of the variations in readiness to adopt e-voting can be explained by perceived ease of use, PU, trust propensity and attitude towards adoption. Attitude towards adopting e-voting accounts for the highest variations in the model followed by trust propensity and finally PU. However, perceived ease of use was found to be insignificant. Research limitations/implications The study was limited to only PU, perceived ease of use, trust propensity, attitudes towards using/adoption and readiness to accept e-voting amidst the COVID-19 strict conditions. In Africa, electoral democracy can be influenced by a number of factors such as finances, education levels, sectarianism, voter rigging, perceived risk, political and economic environment. These were not taken into consideration yet they would affect the stakeholders’ attitudes and perceptions which would directly or indirectly affect the adoption of electronic voting. Practical implications Given the low levels of technology infrastructure in the country, there is a general low uptake of technology-oriented systems. The internet reach is low and quality is poor whilst the radio and televisions network is limited to a few urban settings, poor quality technology systems such as the recently acquired voter biometric systems and the constant government actions to switch off the internet and social media whenever there are contentious political issues. These inadequacies together with the restrictive COVID-19 conditions have compromised the participation of stakeholders which dents the stakeholders’ readiness to accept e-voting which consequently compromises electoral democracy in the country. Therefore, government, electoral observers, the international community and civil society organizations need to accelerate the technology infrastructure development in the country, training and development of technical skills and competences, as well as mass mobilization on the use of technology-oriented platforms aimed at promoting electoral democracy. The country should come up with ICT policies and regulations that encourage the use of ICT in areas that promote democracy. These may include; the use of an easy e-voting system such as emails and voting via the post office. Also, Lawmakers, civil society organizations and the international community should make it punitive for anyone who disenfranchises people through internet disconnection, denial of access to broadcast, print and online media. These interventions will restore peoples’ attitudes and perceptions towards electronic voting, consequently increasing their levels of participation in the electioneering process. Originality/value The Ministry of Health, the Uganda Police Force and other security agencies have come out strongly to enforce the COVID-19 standard operating procedures which among others include the banning of political gatherings, processions and meetings of any kind. As a remedy, the Electoral Commission is encouraging political parties, electoral candidates, voters and other stakeholders to use technology-oriented systems such as mobile phones, broadcast and print media, the internet and others to reach out to the electorate. With the government in full control of all these electronic, print and broadcast media, having previously switched them off during the 2011 and 2016 polls consequently disenfranchising many people from their democratic rights, it remains unknown the extent to which the electorate is ready to accept and appreciate scientific voting more so during this time when restrictions against COVID-19 are not making it any better for the voters and other key participants to carry out their political and civil activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19是否威胁乌干达的选举民主?在COVID-19大流行期间,准备接受“科学投票”(电子投票)
本文的目的是评估在COVID-19大流行的限制条件下乌干达人接受电子投票的准备情况。设计/方法/方法一份半结构化的问卷,建立在五点李克特量表上,回答范围从1(强烈不同意)到5(强烈同意),用于从四个主要的选举利益相关者(即政策制定者、城市和半城市青年、农村选民和政府官员)那里获得可量化的数据。这些利益攸关方被有意和方便地选中,因为他们在促进乌干达选举民主方面发挥了有影响力的作用。采用横断面调查设计,作者采用相关和定量研究设计来收集和分析数据。根据Krejcie和Morgan(1970)的建议,从384个最大样本量中收集数据,从中获得252个有用的回复(回复率为65.6%)。使用社会科学家版本21.0的统计软件包,作者进行了Pearson相关系数来确定研究变量之间的关系,并进行了线性回归分析,以预测利益相关者接受电子投票的准备程度,特别是在COVID-19大流行造成的约束下。发现感知有用性与采用态度、感知易用性与采用态度、态度与准备程度、信任倾向与准备程度之间存在显著正相关。回归结果表明,采用电子投票的准备程度变化中有65%可以用感知易用性、PU、信任倾向和采用态度来解释。采用电子投票的态度对模型的影响最大,其次是信任倾向,最后是PU。然而,感知易用性被发现是无关紧要的。研究局限/影响本研究仅限于PU、感知易用性、信任倾向、对使用/采用的态度以及在COVID-19严格条件下接受电子投票的准备情况。在非洲,选举民主可能受到许多因素的影响,如财政、教育水平、宗派主义、操纵选民、感知风险、政治和经济环境。这些都没有考虑到,但他们会影响利益相关者的态度和看法,这将直接或间接地影响电子投票的采用。实际影响鉴于该国的技术基础设施水平较低,对面向技术的系统的接受程度普遍较低。互联网覆盖面低,质量差,广播和电视网络仅限于少数城市环境,质量差的技术系统,如最近获得的选民生物识别系统,以及每当有争议的政治问题时,政府就会不断采取行动关闭互联网和社交媒体。这些不足加上COVID-19的限制性条件损害了利益攸关方的参与,削弱了利益攸关方接受电子投票的意愿,从而损害了该国的选举民主。因此,政府、选举观察员、国际社会和民间社会组织需要加快该国技术基础设施的发展,培训和发展技术技能和能力,以及动员群众使用旨在促进选举民主的面向技术的平台。国家应该制定信息通信技术政策和法规,鼓励在促进民主的领域使用信息通信技术。这些可能包括;使用简单的电子投票系统,如电子邮件和通过邮局投票。此外,立法者、民间社会组织和国际社会应该惩罚任何通过切断互联网、拒绝使用广播、印刷和在线媒体来剥夺人民公民权的人。这些干预措施将恢复人们对电子投票的态度和看法,从而提高他们参与竞选过程的程度。卫生部、乌干达警察部队和其他安全机构已大力执行COVID-19标准作业程序,其中包括禁止政治集会、游行和任何形式的会议。作为补救措施,选举委员会鼓励各政党、选举候选人、选民和其他利益攸关方使用以技术为导向的系统,如移动电话、广播和印刷媒体、互联网和其他方式与选民接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Emerald holds journals from the current and previous year. We hold all older back volumes and can supply high quality reprints for most volumes that were previously out-of-print. Complete list of titles we can supply from this publisher Publisher''s web page and subscription information
期刊最新文献
Socio and macroeconomic determinants of mobile money adoption: a cross-cultural study of selected MENA and Sub-Saharan countries Adoption of digital payment FinTech service by Gen Y and Gen Z users: evidence from India Blockchain technology in foreign trade management: which blockchain alternative is more suitable? Enterprise architecture for the transformation of public services based on citizen’s feedback Blockchain for environmental peacebuilding: application in water management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1