Forensic Identification of Suspected Document on the Basis of their Ink Profiling

Suneet Kumar, V. Saran, Rajeev Kumar, M. S. Sankhla, Ramesh Kumar, Pandey
{"title":"Forensic Identification of Suspected Document on the Basis of their Ink Profiling","authors":"Suneet Kumar, V. Saran, Rajeev Kumar, M. S. Sankhla, Ramesh Kumar, Pandey","doi":"10.20431/2456-0049.0402001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The forensic suspected/questioned document is a very challenging ground. Hardly a day energy by deprived of some document playing a portion in the life of human lives. Questioned documents are verified consistently in forensic science laboratories for their genuineness. Human development has observed script organizations mean while early period also for footage determinations or as a means of communication. The script resources and tools used in the earlier comprised stone, wax, vellum, quills, leaf, wooden materials, etc. [1]. In questioned document cases, one of the current significant features contains the proof of identity and judgement of indicator (permanent and whiteboard) pen inks which are extensively used for numerous requests. These inks are finished up of colorants (i.e., dye or pigment), a solvent or thinners, resins, surfactants, lubricants, emulsifiers, and additives [2]. The most significant query for file specialists is to response whether the liquid ink used is similar or dissimilar in the manufacture of a document. Consequently, the present method delivers valued vision to the forensic expert production with questioned document inspections. It also helps in the connection of unidentified pointer inks to the enduring or whiteboard markers which can thin down the statistics of alleged samples [3].","PeriodicalId":8554,"journal":{"name":"ARC Journal of Forensic Science","volume":"195 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARC Journal of Forensic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20431/2456-0049.0402001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The forensic suspected/questioned document is a very challenging ground. Hardly a day energy by deprived of some document playing a portion in the life of human lives. Questioned documents are verified consistently in forensic science laboratories for their genuineness. Human development has observed script organizations mean while early period also for footage determinations or as a means of communication. The script resources and tools used in the earlier comprised stone, wax, vellum, quills, leaf, wooden materials, etc. [1]. In questioned document cases, one of the current significant features contains the proof of identity and judgement of indicator (permanent and whiteboard) pen inks which are extensively used for numerous requests. These inks are finished up of colorants (i.e., dye or pigment), a solvent or thinners, resins, surfactants, lubricants, emulsifiers, and additives [2]. The most significant query for file specialists is to response whether the liquid ink used is similar or dissimilar in the manufacture of a document. Consequently, the present method delivers valued vision to the forensic expert production with questioned document inspections. It also helps in the connection of unidentified pointer inks to the enduring or whiteboard markers which can thin down the statistics of alleged samples [3].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于墨迹分析的可疑文件的法医鉴定
法医怀疑/质疑文件是一个非常具有挑战性的领域。几乎没有一天的精力被剥夺了一些文件在人类生活中起着重要作用。被质疑的文件的真实性在法医学实验室得到一致的核实。人类发展已观察到剧本组织的同时,早期也用于素材确定或作为一种交流手段。早期使用的文字资源和工具包括石头、蜡、皮纸、羽毛笔、树叶、木质材料等[1]。在被质疑的文件案件中,目前的一个重要特征包括身份证明和判断指示器(永久和白板)钢笔墨水,这被广泛用于许多请求。这些油墨是由着色剂(即染料或颜料)、溶剂或稀释剂、树脂、表面活性剂、润滑剂、乳化剂和添加剂[2]组成的。对于文件专家来说,最重要的查询是响应在制作文件时使用的液体墨水是相似的还是不同的。因此,本方法提供有价值的视觉与质疑文件检查的法医专家生产。它还有助于将未识别的指针墨水连接到持久或白板标记,这可以减少所谓样本的统计[3]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In Silico Functional Analysis of Variants in Genes Associated with Sudden Cardiac Death in Cases of the National Institute of Legal Medicine of Colombia Is it Possible to Determine the Length of the Human Body by the Parameters of the Mandible? Forensic Science in Ayurveda Industrial Pollution Youth Becoming Addict of Cannabis and its Advancement at the Cost of Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1