Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: Immigration, Islam, and the West

D. D. Murphey
{"title":"Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: Immigration, Islam, and the West","authors":"D. D. Murphey","doi":"10.5860/choice.47-3403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: Immigration, Islam, and the West Christopher Caldwell Doubleday, 2009 Christopher Caldwell is a senior editor at The Weekly Standard. With this book, he has added his voice to the literature discussing and warning against the on-going change occurring in the identity of Europe as its native population shrinks and as an immigrant population, mostly Islamic, establishes within it a growing parallel society. This journal has reviewed three of the earlier books: Walter Laqueur's The Last Days of Europe (in our Winter 2007 issue, pp. 519-522), Tony Blankley's The West's Last Chance (Winter 2005, pp. 524-531), and Patrick J. Buchanan's The Death of the West (Spring 2002, pp. 126-130). Even though they deal with the same theme, each of these books, including Caldwell's, has much to say that keeps it from being a mere repetition of the others. Caldwell's contribution consists largely of his emphasis on Islam and his dissection of shibboleths that have long ruled the thinking within Europe, especially within Europe's governing class. This isn't to say that he doesn't have a good deal else to tell. His work with The Weekly Standard makes clear his identification with American \"neo-conservatism\"; and, among the authors just mentioned, this puts him closest to Blankley. He avoids, however, the extremes of which we were so critical in Blankley's book. Caldwell does not join Blankley in calling for a testosterone-ladened ruthlessness in response to jihadism. Caldwell mostly limits himself to factual explication and conceptual analysis, leaving policy prescriptions to others. If he agrees with Blankley's extremes, he gives no indication of it. It is surprising that Caldwell writes about the demographic threat to Europe without showing an awareness of (or giving a nod of recognition to) the other books. He does, at least, tell about Jean Raspail's haunting 1973 novel The Camp of the Saints; but neither the bibliography nor the index mentions Blankley, Buchanan or Laqueur. The surprise at these omissions is lessened, of course, because we know that many authors say very little about the contributions of others. This fashion would seem to stem in part from the incivilities imposed by publishers' and authors' frequent insistence upon an overly-constricted interpretation of the \"fair use\" doctrine, which has long made it legally uncomfortable to bring in other authors. Caldwell's book gives informative details about the history of Islamic immigration into Europe. During the decade immediately following World War II, a prostrate Europe desperately needed manpower, and brought in large numbers of immigrants for what Europeans thought would be short stays. But then, when \"the economic benefits [that] immigration brought [proved] marginal and temporary,\" most of Europe (except for France until 2006) shifted to a more selective type of immigration. It found it difficult, however, to find highly skilled people. Despite this and \"generously financed repatriation programs\" in the late 1970s, the flood of immigration continued, at which time the rationale changed from \"labor immigration... to refugee immigration\" (also spoken of as \"political asylum\"), to which was added the bringing in of relatives for \"family unification.\" The new rationale converted the welcoming of immigration into a moral duty, as distinct from an economic necessity. It eventuated that the refugees didn't return to their home countries after the exigencies that had forced them to flee to Europe dissipated. In fact, there proved to be a vast overhang of population in the Third World that yearned to be in Europe. Some Arab countries, such as Saudi Arabia, spent large sums to support the immigration, aiding Islam in Europe and financing the building of mosques. In the meantime, the European Union adopted the principle of internal openness that permits free movement within Europe. This has had the effect of taking from national governments the ability to limit immigration into their respective countries. …","PeriodicalId":52486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"87","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-3403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 87

Abstract

Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: Immigration, Islam, and the West Christopher Caldwell Doubleday, 2009 Christopher Caldwell is a senior editor at The Weekly Standard. With this book, he has added his voice to the literature discussing and warning against the on-going change occurring in the identity of Europe as its native population shrinks and as an immigrant population, mostly Islamic, establishes within it a growing parallel society. This journal has reviewed three of the earlier books: Walter Laqueur's The Last Days of Europe (in our Winter 2007 issue, pp. 519-522), Tony Blankley's The West's Last Chance (Winter 2005, pp. 524-531), and Patrick J. Buchanan's The Death of the West (Spring 2002, pp. 126-130). Even though they deal with the same theme, each of these books, including Caldwell's, has much to say that keeps it from being a mere repetition of the others. Caldwell's contribution consists largely of his emphasis on Islam and his dissection of shibboleths that have long ruled the thinking within Europe, especially within Europe's governing class. This isn't to say that he doesn't have a good deal else to tell. His work with The Weekly Standard makes clear his identification with American "neo-conservatism"; and, among the authors just mentioned, this puts him closest to Blankley. He avoids, however, the extremes of which we were so critical in Blankley's book. Caldwell does not join Blankley in calling for a testosterone-ladened ruthlessness in response to jihadism. Caldwell mostly limits himself to factual explication and conceptual analysis, leaving policy prescriptions to others. If he agrees with Blankley's extremes, he gives no indication of it. It is surprising that Caldwell writes about the demographic threat to Europe without showing an awareness of (or giving a nod of recognition to) the other books. He does, at least, tell about Jean Raspail's haunting 1973 novel The Camp of the Saints; but neither the bibliography nor the index mentions Blankley, Buchanan or Laqueur. The surprise at these omissions is lessened, of course, because we know that many authors say very little about the contributions of others. This fashion would seem to stem in part from the incivilities imposed by publishers' and authors' frequent insistence upon an overly-constricted interpretation of the "fair use" doctrine, which has long made it legally uncomfortable to bring in other authors. Caldwell's book gives informative details about the history of Islamic immigration into Europe. During the decade immediately following World War II, a prostrate Europe desperately needed manpower, and brought in large numbers of immigrants for what Europeans thought would be short stays. But then, when "the economic benefits [that] immigration brought [proved] marginal and temporary," most of Europe (except for France until 2006) shifted to a more selective type of immigration. It found it difficult, however, to find highly skilled people. Despite this and "generously financed repatriation programs" in the late 1970s, the flood of immigration continued, at which time the rationale changed from "labor immigration... to refugee immigration" (also spoken of as "political asylum"), to which was added the bringing in of relatives for "family unification." The new rationale converted the welcoming of immigration into a moral duty, as distinct from an economic necessity. It eventuated that the refugees didn't return to their home countries after the exigencies that had forced them to flee to Europe dissipated. In fact, there proved to be a vast overhang of population in the Third World that yearned to be in Europe. Some Arab countries, such as Saudi Arabia, spent large sums to support the immigration, aiding Islam in Europe and financing the building of mosques. In the meantime, the European Union adopted the principle of internal openness that permits free movement within Europe. This has had the effect of taking from national governments the ability to limit immigration into their respective countries. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对欧洲革命的反思:移民、伊斯兰教和西方
《对欧洲革命的反思:移民、伊斯兰教和西方》克里斯托弗·考德威尔,2009年双日版,克里斯托弗·考德威尔,《旗帜周刊》资深编辑。通过这本书,他在讨论和警告欧洲身份正在发生的变化的文学作品中加入了自己的声音,因为欧洲本土人口减少,而移民人口(主要是伊斯兰人)在其中建立了一个日益增长的平行社会。本刊回顾了早期的三本书:沃尔特·拉克尔的《欧洲最后的日子》(2007年冬季刊,第519-522页),托尼·布兰克利的《西方的最后机会》(2005年冬季刊,第524-531页),帕特里克·j·布坎南的《西方之死》(2002年春季刊,第126-130页)。尽管它们讨论的是同一个主题,但每本书,包括考德威尔的书,都有很多话要说,使它不只是重复其他书。考德威尔的贡献主要在于他对伊斯兰教的强调,以及他对长期统治欧洲思想的教条的剖析,尤其是在欧洲统治阶级中。这并不是说他没有很多其他的故事可讲。他在《旗帜周刊》的工作表明了他对美国“新保守主义”的认同;而且,在刚刚提到的作者中,这使他最接近布莱克利。然而,他避免了我们在布莱克利的书中所批评的极端。考德威尔并没有和布兰克利一样,呼吁以一种充满睾丸激素的无情方式来回应圣战主义。考德威尔主要将自己局限于事实解释和概念分析,而将政策处方留给其他人。如果他同意布莱克利的极端观点,他也没有给出任何迹象。令人惊讶的是,考德威尔写了欧洲面临的人口威胁,却没有表现出对其他书的意识(或点头表示认可)。至少,他提到了让·拉斯帕尔1973年令人难忘的小说《圣徒营》;但参考书目和索引都没有提到布莱克利、布坎南或拉克尔。当然,对这些遗漏的惊讶减少了,因为我们知道许多作者很少提及其他人的贡献。这种潮流似乎部分源于出版商和作者经常坚持对“合理使用”原则的过度限制所带来的不文明行为,这使得引入其他作者在法律上很不舒服。考德威尔的书详细介绍了伊斯兰教移民欧洲的历史。在第二次世界大战后的十年里,一蹶不振的欧洲急需人力,于是欧洲人带来了大量移民,他们认为这些移民只会短暂停留。但后来,当“移民带来的经济利益被证明是边际的和暂时的”时,大多数欧洲国家(2006年之前法国除外)转向了一种更有选择性的移民类型。然而,它发现很难找到高技能的人才。尽管如此,加上20世纪70年代末“慷慨资助的遣返计划”,移民潮仍在继续,当时的理由从“劳工移民……“难民移民”(也被称为“政治庇护”),还增加了“家庭团聚”的亲属入境。新的理论基础将欢迎移民转变为一种道德责任,与经济必要性截然不同。在迫使他们逃往欧洲的紧急情况消散后,难民们最终没有返回自己的祖国。事实上,第三世界有大量的人口渴望进入欧洲。一些阿拉伯国家,如沙特阿拉伯,花了大量资金支持移民,帮助欧洲的伊斯兰教,并资助建造清真寺。与此同时,欧盟采取了内部开放的原则,允许欧洲内部的自由流动。这就剥夺了各国政府限制移民进入本国的能力。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies
Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The quarterly Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies (ISSN 0193-5941), which has been published regularly since 1976, is a peer-reviewed academic journal devoted to scholarly papers which present in depth information on contemporary issues of primarily international interest. The emphasis is on factual information rather than purely theoretical or historical papers, although it welcomes an historical approach to contemporary situations where this serves to clarify the causal background to present day problems.
期刊最新文献
Einstein: His Life and Universe The China Mirage: The Hidden History of American Disaster in Asia Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the End Days of Rage: America's Radical Underground, the FBI, and the Forgotten Age of Revolutionary Violence The Specter of Capital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1