Actuar o no actuar: un análisis comparativo del rol de los estados de Chiapas y Arizona en la gestión de la inmigración*

Q3 Social Sciences Norteamerica Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.20999/nam.2016.a006
Eduardo Torre-Cantalapiedra , Jorge A. Schiavon
{"title":"Actuar o no actuar: un análisis comparativo del rol de los estados de Chiapas y Arizona en la gestión de la inmigración*","authors":"Eduardo Torre-Cantalapiedra ,&nbsp;Jorge A. Schiavon","doi":"10.20999/nam.2016.a006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Setting immigration policy is reserved for the federal government in both Mexico and the United States. However, <em>de facto</em>, the states in both countries carry out certain immigration policies. Chiapas and Arizona have both faced challenges in this area. The government of Arizona has followed an anti-immigrant logic, while the government of Chiapas has focused on the defense of migrants’ human rights. The aim of this article is to understand the practically opposite roles played by these two states in managing immigration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37648,"journal":{"name":"Norteamerica","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 159-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20999/nam.2016.a006","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norteamerica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1870355018300065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Setting immigration policy is reserved for the federal government in both Mexico and the United States. However, de facto, the states in both countries carry out certain immigration policies. Chiapas and Arizona have both faced challenges in this area. The government of Arizona has followed an anti-immigrant logic, while the government of Chiapas has focused on the defense of migrants’ human rights. The aim of this article is to understand the practically opposite roles played by these two states in managing immigration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行动还是不行动:恰帕斯州和亚利桑那州在移民管理中的作用比较分析*
制定移民政策是墨西哥和美国联邦政府的职责。然而,事实上,两国的州都执行一定的移民政策。恰帕斯州和亚利桑那州在这方面都面临着挑战。亚利桑那州政府遵循反移民的逻辑,而恰帕斯州政府则专注于捍卫移民的人权。本文的目的是了解这两个国家在管理移民方面所扮演的实际上相反的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Norteamerica
Norteamerica Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Editorial Policies Focus and Scope Section Policies Peer Review Process Open Access Policy Archiving General Criteria Ethical Guidelines Directory Indexing Editorial Bodies Editorial Board International Advisory Board Focus and Scope Norteamérica is a semiannual peer-reviewed journal regarding multi and interdisciplinary academic studies about the North America region (Mexico, United States and Canada) which consider the region itself as an object of study, along with its evolution, its individual processes and internal dynamics. An analysis of the reality of each of the three nations is thematically linked with the rest of the region. 1.- Norteamérica will publish exclusively multi- and interdisciplinary academic studies focused on the North American region (Mexico, the United States and Canada) that: a) address the region as an object of analysis: specifically, its evolution, particular processes, and internal dynamics; b) analyze the reality in each of the three nations, linking them thematically with the rest of the region; c) carry out comparative studies of the nations of North America; d) address the region and its insertion in the international context; and e) expand upon international processes and their impact within the region. 2.- Through these research perspectives, the journal will disseminate articles addressing a wide variety of general and specific issues: a) politics, economics, society and culture; b) foreign policy, trade, political systems, security, comparative politics, political philosophy and history; and c) migration, electoral processes, borders, science and technology, minorities, the environment and natural resources, education, human rights, gender, and others.
期刊最新文献
Transnational Linked Fate and Identity in Support for a Mexico-U.S. Political Union Agua subterránea y soberanía interdependiente: el caso de los Sistemas Acuíferos Transfronterizos en la región binacional de Paso del Norte Realidad frente a hechos alternativos: la migración irregular hacia Estados Unidos y las deportaciones de población mexicana durante la administración de Trump De la no intervención a la institucionalización del cabildeo del gobierno mexicano en Estados Unidos Etiología del tráfico de migrantes en México: relevancia de los factores de atracción
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1