Lock-In, Fixation and the Extinction of Technologies: A Design-Theoretic View of Sustainable Transitions

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sheji.2022.08.001
Chris McMahon , Eswaran Subrahmanian , Yoram Reich
{"title":"Lock-In, Fixation and the Extinction of Technologies: A Design-Theoretic View of Sustainable Transitions","authors":"Chris McMahon ,&nbsp;Eswaran Subrahmanian ,&nbsp;Yoram Reich","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2022.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this viewpoint article we discuss the challenges to achieving sustainability transitions from the perspective of theories of design and of technology. We first introduce the environmental issues that face industrial civilization, noting the differences in viewpoints concerning whether planetary limits are largely insurmountable or if they may be alleviated through human ingenuity. We then give an overview of theoretical perspectives on the nature of technology and of technological change and innovation before discussing the implications of these theoretical perspectives for possible approaches to sustainability transition. In particular, we note the importance of the maturity of technologies and the challenges of increasing technological complexity. We then introduce a selection of theoretical perspectives on the nature of design, before discussing the implications of these, especially the knowledge requirements in identifying feasible transition steps, and the inherent conflict between different viewpoints on planetary limits. We emphasize the risk of fixation and the importance of trade-offs. We conclude by proposing a five-fold set of actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 415-430"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872622000508/pdfft?md5=94c5accb6eb4cdef4fb3d33dd62e92f4&pid=1-s2.0-S2405872622000508-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872622000508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this viewpoint article we discuss the challenges to achieving sustainability transitions from the perspective of theories of design and of technology. We first introduce the environmental issues that face industrial civilization, noting the differences in viewpoints concerning whether planetary limits are largely insurmountable or if they may be alleviated through human ingenuity. We then give an overview of theoretical perspectives on the nature of technology and of technological change and innovation before discussing the implications of these theoretical perspectives for possible approaches to sustainability transition. In particular, we note the importance of the maturity of technologies and the challenges of increasing technological complexity. We then introduce a selection of theoretical perspectives on the nature of design, before discussing the implications of these, especially the knowledge requirements in identifying feasible transition steps, and the inherent conflict between different viewpoints on planetary limits. We emphasize the risk of fixation and the importance of trade-offs. We conclude by proposing a five-fold set of actions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术的锁定、固定和消亡:可持续转型的设计理论观点
在这篇观点文章中,我们从设计理论和技术的角度讨论了实现可持续性转型的挑战。我们首先介绍了工业文明所面临的环境问题,并注意到关于地球的极限是否在很大程度上是不可逾越的,或者是否可以通过人类的聪明才智来减轻它们的观点的差异。然后,在讨论这些理论观点对可持续性过渡的可能方法的影响之前,我们概述了技术和技术变革与创新的本质的理论观点。我们特别注意到技术成熟的重要性以及日益复杂的技术所带来的挑战。然后,我们介绍了一些关于设计本质的理论观点,然后讨论了这些理论的含义,特别是确定可行过渡步骤的知识要求,以及关于地球极限的不同观点之间的内在冲突。我们强调固定的风险和权衡的重要性。最后,我们提出了五项行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial Reconceptualizing the Notion of Values in Design Talk Value Dimensions in Creative Collaborations for Social Innovation The Tools of the Trade: Cultures, Devices, and Valuation Practices in Urban Design Creating and Testing a Guideline for Governing Blockchain Ecosystems: A Study Informed by Design Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1