Evaluation of the performance of a lateral flow device for quantitative detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG

J.S. Moore , L.J. Robertson , R. Price , G. Curry , J. Farnan , A. Black , M.A. Nesbit , J.A. McLaughlin , T. Moore
{"title":"Evaluation of the performance of a lateral flow device for quantitative detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG","authors":"J.S. Moore ,&nbsp;L.J. Robertson ,&nbsp;R. Price ,&nbsp;G. Curry ,&nbsp;J. Farnan ,&nbsp;A. Black ,&nbsp;M.A. Nesbit ,&nbsp;J.A. McLaughlin ,&nbsp;T. Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.clicom.2022.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Introduction: The AbC-19™ lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) performance was evaluated on plasma samples from a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination cohort, WHO international standards for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (human), individuals ≥2 weeks from infection of RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 genetic variants, as well as microorganism serology.</p><p>Methods: Pre-vaccination to three weeks post-booster samples were collected from a cohort of 111 patients (including clinically extremely vulnerable patients) from Northern Ireland. All patients received Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination for the first and second dose, and Pfizer-BioNTech for the third (first booster). WHO international standards, 15 samples from 2 variants of concern (Delta and Omicron) and cross-reactivity with plasma samples from other microorganism infections were also assessed on AbC-19™.</p><p>Results: All 80 (100%) participants sampled post-booster had high positive IgG responses, compared to 38/95 (40%) participants at 6 months post-first vaccination. WHO standard results correlated with information from corresponding biological data sheets, and antibodies to all genetic variants were detected by LFIA. No cross-reactivity was found with exception of one (of five) Dengue virus samples.</p><p>Conclusion: These findings suggest BNT162b2 booster vaccination enhanced humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 from pre-booster levels, and that this antibody response was detectable by the LFIA. In combination with cross-reactivity, standards and genetic variant results would suggest LFIA may be a cost-effective measure to assess SARS-CoV-2 antibody status.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100269,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Immunology Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277261342200021X/pdfft?md5=573dcfdb4bafa05ccf57518ff31f08ca&pid=1-s2.0-S277261342200021X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Immunology Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277261342200021X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The AbC-19™ lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) performance was evaluated on plasma samples from a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination cohort, WHO international standards for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (human), individuals ≥2 weeks from infection of RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 genetic variants, as well as microorganism serology.

Methods: Pre-vaccination to three weeks post-booster samples were collected from a cohort of 111 patients (including clinically extremely vulnerable patients) from Northern Ireland. All patients received Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination for the first and second dose, and Pfizer-BioNTech for the third (first booster). WHO international standards, 15 samples from 2 variants of concern (Delta and Omicron) and cross-reactivity with plasma samples from other microorganism infections were also assessed on AbC-19™.

Results: All 80 (100%) participants sampled post-booster had high positive IgG responses, compared to 38/95 (40%) participants at 6 months post-first vaccination. WHO standard results correlated with information from corresponding biological data sheets, and antibodies to all genetic variants were detected by LFIA. No cross-reactivity was found with exception of one (of five) Dengue virus samples.

Conclusion: These findings suggest BNT162b2 booster vaccination enhanced humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 from pre-booster levels, and that this antibody response was detectable by the LFIA. In combination with cross-reactivity, standards and genetic variant results would suggest LFIA may be a cost-effective measure to assess SARS-CoV-2 antibody status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗sars - cov -2 IgG水平流式定量检测装置的性能评价
本研究对来自SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种队列、WHO抗SARS-CoV-2 IgG(人)国际标准、感染RT-PCR确认的SARS-CoV-2遗传变异≥2周的个体以及微生物血清学的血浆样本进行了AbC-19™横向流动免疫测定(LFIA)性能评估。方法:从北爱尔兰111例患者(包括临床极度易感患者)中收集疫苗接种前至加强后三周的样本。所有患者均接种了第一剂和第二剂牛津-阿斯利康COVID-19疫苗,第三剂为辉瑞- biontech疫苗(第一次加强剂)。还用AbC-19™评估了世卫组织国际标准、来自两种关注变体(Delta和Omicron)的15份样本以及与其他微生物感染血浆样本的交叉反应性。结果:与首次接种疫苗6个月后38/95(40%)的参与者相比,所有80名(100%)接种强化疫苗后的参与者都有高阳性IgG反应。世卫组织标准结果与相应生物数据表的信息相关,LFIA检测到所有遗传变异的抗体。除五份登革热病毒样本中的一份外,未发现交叉反应性。结论:上述结果提示BNT162b2加强疫苗接种可增强对SARS-CoV-2的体液免疫,且这种抗体应答可通过LFIA检测到。结合交叉反应性、标准和遗传变异结果,LFIA可能是评估SARS-CoV-2抗体状态的一种具有成本效益的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated RELA and RELC knockout in human regulatory T cells abrogates FOXP3 expression and suppressive function Deficiency of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist: An updated review of the pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, and treatments First report of Mycobacterium chimaera infection in a patient with chronic granulomatous disease Chronic disseminated histoplasmosis in a patient on fingolimod therapy: A case report and review of literature Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1