A Novel Framework for Inner-Outer Sustainability Assessment

Challenges Pub Date : 2022-12-13 DOI:10.3390/challe13020064
K. J. Cooper, Robert B. Gibson
{"title":"A Novel Framework for Inner-Outer Sustainability Assessment","authors":"K. J. Cooper, Robert B. Gibson","doi":"10.3390/challe13020064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calls for systemic transformations have become prevalent throughout sustainability discourse. Increasingly, these calls point towards consciousness expanding practices and interventions, such as mindfulness, to support the development of individual understandings, skills, and capacities that are conducive to more sustainable ways of being and doing. The growing interest in leveraging inner capacities, including mindsets, worldviews, values, and beliefs for sustainability transformations emerges from concerns that conventional approaches are failing to align social and ecological systems towards long-term viability. Interest in these consciousness-driven transformations is spreading, particularly in governments and prominent organisations. Tempering this enthusiasm are concerns that untethered from moral and ethical guidelines as well as caring understanding of local and global prospects for lasting wellbeing, mindfulness programs, workshops, and interventions for inner transformation can inadvertently strengthen unsustainable systems and deepen inequities. Accordingly, this paper presents an exploratory assessment framework to increase understandings of how events focused on interventions for inner transformation align with broad sustainability requirements. Findings from application of the framework should help to elucidate how these offerings can disrupt normative ways of thinking and doing, and in turn, positively influence multi-scalar transformations. Furthermore, use of the assessment process to plan and/or evaluate inner development offerings is anticipated to help strengthen progress towards sustainability and reduce adverse trade-offs that might undermine positive systemic transformations.","PeriodicalId":91008,"journal":{"name":"Challenges","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13020064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Calls for systemic transformations have become prevalent throughout sustainability discourse. Increasingly, these calls point towards consciousness expanding practices and interventions, such as mindfulness, to support the development of individual understandings, skills, and capacities that are conducive to more sustainable ways of being and doing. The growing interest in leveraging inner capacities, including mindsets, worldviews, values, and beliefs for sustainability transformations emerges from concerns that conventional approaches are failing to align social and ecological systems towards long-term viability. Interest in these consciousness-driven transformations is spreading, particularly in governments and prominent organisations. Tempering this enthusiasm are concerns that untethered from moral and ethical guidelines as well as caring understanding of local and global prospects for lasting wellbeing, mindfulness programs, workshops, and interventions for inner transformation can inadvertently strengthen unsustainable systems and deepen inequities. Accordingly, this paper presents an exploratory assessment framework to increase understandings of how events focused on interventions for inner transformation align with broad sustainability requirements. Findings from application of the framework should help to elucidate how these offerings can disrupt normative ways of thinking and doing, and in turn, positively influence multi-scalar transformations. Furthermore, use of the assessment process to plan and/or evaluate inner development offerings is anticipated to help strengthen progress towards sustainability and reduce adverse trade-offs that might undermine positive systemic transformations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内外可持续性评价的新框架
在整个可持续性话语中,对系统性变革的呼吁已经变得普遍。这些呼吁越来越多地指向意识扩展的实践和干预,比如正念,以支持个人理解、技能和能力的发展,有利于更可持续的存在和行为方式。人们越来越关注利用内部能力,包括思维方式、世界观、价值观和信仰来实现可持续性转型,这源于人们对传统方法未能使社会和生态系统与长期可行性保持一致的担忧。对这些意识驱动的转变的兴趣正在蔓延,尤其是在政府和知名组织中。人们担心,不受道德和伦理准则的束缚,以及对当地和全球持久福祉前景的关怀理解,正念计划、研讨会和内部转型干预措施可能会无意中加强不可持续的系统,加深不平等。因此,本文提出了一个探索性评估框架,以增加对内部转型干预的事件如何与广泛的可持续性要求保持一致的理解。应用该框架的结果应该有助于阐明这些产品如何破坏规范的思维和行为方式,并反过来积极影响多标量转换。此外,利用评估过程来规划和(或)评价内部发展成果,预计将有助于加强可持续性方面的进展,并减少可能破坏积极的系统变革的不利权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Safe Space for Dialogue—A Practice for Connected Consciousness and Compassion From Life-Skills Research and Training to Sustainability: A Case Study from a Spanish University Supporting Ageing Populations in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis of Pension Schemes and Policy Insights A New Vision for Challenges: A Transdisciplinary Journal Promoting Planetary Health and Flourishing for All Unlocking the Transformative Potential of Outdoor Office Work—A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1