Christiana Sabett, Ariel Hafftka, Kyle Sexton, Richard G. Spencer
{"title":"L1, Lp, L2, and elastic net penalties for regularization of Gaussian component distributions in magnetic resonance relaxometry","authors":"Christiana Sabett, Ariel Hafftka, Kyle Sexton, Richard G. Spencer","doi":"10.1002/cmr.a.21427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Determination of the distribution of magnetic resonance (MR) transverse relaxation times is emerging as an important method for materials characterization, including assessment of tissue pathology in biomedicine. These distributions are obtained from the inverse Laplace transform (ILT) of multiexponential decay data. Stabilization of this classically ill-posed problem is most commonly attempted using Tikhonov regularization with an L<sub>2</sub> penalty term. However, with the availability of convex optimization algorithms and recognition of the importance of sparsity in model reconstruction, there has been increasing interest in alternative penalties. The L<sub>1</sub> penalty enforces a greater degree of sparsity than L<sub>2</sub>, and so may be suitable for highly localized relaxation time distributions. In addition, L<sub><i>p</i></sub> penalties, 1 < <i>p </i>< 2, and the elastic net (EN) penalty, defined as a linear combination of L<sub>1</sub> and L<sub>2</sub> penalties, may be appropriate for distributions consisting of both narrow and broad components. We evaluate the L<sub>1</sub>, L<sub>2</sub>, L<sub><i>p</i></sub>, and EN penalties for model relaxation time distributions consisting of two Gaussian peaks. For distributions with narrow Gaussian peaks, the L<sub>1</sub> penalty works well to maintain sparsity and promote resolution, while the conventional L<sub>2</sub> penalty performs best for distributions with broader peaks. Finally, the L<sub><i>p</i></sub> and EN penalties do in fact outperform the L<sub>1</sub> and L<sub>2</sub> penalties for distributions with components of unequal widths. These findings serve as indicators of appropriate regularization in the typical situation in which the experimentalist has a priori knowledge of the general characteristics of the underlying relaxation time distribution. Our findings can be applied to both the recovery of T<sub>2</sub> distributions from spin echo decay data as well as distributions of other MR parameters, such as apparent diffusion constant, from their multiexponential decay signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":55216,"journal":{"name":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A","volume":"46A 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cmr.a.21427","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cmr.a.21427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
Determination of the distribution of magnetic resonance (MR) transverse relaxation times is emerging as an important method for materials characterization, including assessment of tissue pathology in biomedicine. These distributions are obtained from the inverse Laplace transform (ILT) of multiexponential decay data. Stabilization of this classically ill-posed problem is most commonly attempted using Tikhonov regularization with an L2 penalty term. However, with the availability of convex optimization algorithms and recognition of the importance of sparsity in model reconstruction, there has been increasing interest in alternative penalties. The L1 penalty enforces a greater degree of sparsity than L2, and so may be suitable for highly localized relaxation time distributions. In addition, Lp penalties, 1 < p < 2, and the elastic net (EN) penalty, defined as a linear combination of L1 and L2 penalties, may be appropriate for distributions consisting of both narrow and broad components. We evaluate the L1, L2, Lp, and EN penalties for model relaxation time distributions consisting of two Gaussian peaks. For distributions with narrow Gaussian peaks, the L1 penalty works well to maintain sparsity and promote resolution, while the conventional L2 penalty performs best for distributions with broader peaks. Finally, the Lp and EN penalties do in fact outperform the L1 and L2 penalties for distributions with components of unequal widths. These findings serve as indicators of appropriate regularization in the typical situation in which the experimentalist has a priori knowledge of the general characteristics of the underlying relaxation time distribution. Our findings can be applied to both the recovery of T2 distributions from spin echo decay data as well as distributions of other MR parameters, such as apparent diffusion constant, from their multiexponential decay signals.
期刊介绍:
Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A brings together clinicians, chemists, and physicists involved in the application of magnetic resonance techniques. The journal welcomes contributions predominantly from the fields of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), but also encourages submissions relating to less common magnetic resonance imaging and analytical methods.
Contributors come from academic, governmental, and clinical communities, to disseminate the latest important experimental results from medical, non-medical, and analytical magnetic resonance methods, as well as related computational and theoretical advances.
Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to):
-Fundamental advances in the understanding of magnetic resonance
-Experimental results from magnetic resonance imaging (including MRI and its specialized applications)
-Experimental results from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (including NMR, EPR, and their specialized applications)
-Computational and theoretical support and prediction for experimental results
-Focused reviews providing commentary and discussion on recent results and developments in topical areas of investigation
-Reviews of magnetic resonance approaches with a tutorial or educational approach