Assessment of Structure and Natural Regeneration Capacity of Avicennia Marina and Bruguiera Gymnorrhiza Species of Mangroves in Mida Creek Kilifi County, Kenya

David Amakanga Erasto, B. Okeyo, N. Dharani
{"title":"Assessment of Structure and Natural Regeneration Capacity of Avicennia Marina and Bruguiera Gymnorrhiza Species of Mangroves in Mida Creek Kilifi County, Kenya","authors":"David Amakanga Erasto, B. Okeyo, N. Dharani","doi":"10.26502/IJPAES.202106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study assessed the structure, natural regeneration capacity and Biotic agents of Avicennia marina and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza species in Mida creek, Kilifi County. The study used both cross section and descriptive research design. Avicennia marina species was more dominant with a greater complexity index (A2.7, B0.4), basal area (A588cm2, B484cm2) and mean height (A26m, B10m) compared to Bruguiera gymnorrhiza species with both having an aggregate dispersion pattern. During dry season, Height, and diameter of Avicennia marina had a correlation of 0.56 while Bruguiera gymnorrhiza species had 0.78. During rainy season both had a correlation of 0.67. B. gymnorrhiza species had more straight poles than A. marina species, 75.3% of B. gymnorrhiza trees assessed had straight pole compared to 1.7% of Avicennia marina trees. Both Avicennia marina and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza species had fair regeneration capacity where the number of seedlings was greater than saplings and number of saplings was less than mature trees. Littoraria scabra fed mostly on micro-organisms and algae, Littoraria Glabrata fed mostly on mud surface, Sesarma guttata and Sesarma leptosoma fed on mangrove leaves, Cerithidea decollata fed on deposits and organic matter, Terebralia palustris and Selatium elongatium fed more on algae and leaves, Sesasrmi ortmanni, Metopograpsus oceanicus and Neosarmatium meinerti fed on leaves and young propagules, Barnacles and Oyster bunch on the roots and stems of B. gymnorrhiza species. Biotic agents were insignificant in affecting regeneration capacity of A. marina and B. gymnorrhiza species however combinations with climatic and anthropogenic factors affected Regeneration capacity of the two species.","PeriodicalId":22532,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":"262-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/IJPAES.202106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study assessed the structure, natural regeneration capacity and Biotic agents of Avicennia marina and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza species in Mida creek, Kilifi County. The study used both cross section and descriptive research design. Avicennia marina species was more dominant with a greater complexity index (A2.7, B0.4), basal area (A588cm2, B484cm2) and mean height (A26m, B10m) compared to Bruguiera gymnorrhiza species with both having an aggregate dispersion pattern. During dry season, Height, and diameter of Avicennia marina had a correlation of 0.56 while Bruguiera gymnorrhiza species had 0.78. During rainy season both had a correlation of 0.67. B. gymnorrhiza species had more straight poles than A. marina species, 75.3% of B. gymnorrhiza trees assessed had straight pole compared to 1.7% of Avicennia marina trees. Both Avicennia marina and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza species had fair regeneration capacity where the number of seedlings was greater than saplings and number of saplings was less than mature trees. Littoraria scabra fed mostly on micro-organisms and algae, Littoraria Glabrata fed mostly on mud surface, Sesarma guttata and Sesarma leptosoma fed on mangrove leaves, Cerithidea decollata fed on deposits and organic matter, Terebralia palustris and Selatium elongatium fed more on algae and leaves, Sesasrmi ortmanni, Metopograpsus oceanicus and Neosarmatium meinerti fed on leaves and young propagules, Barnacles and Oyster bunch on the roots and stems of B. gymnorrhiza species. Biotic agents were insignificant in affecting regeneration capacity of A. marina and B. gymnorrhiza species however combinations with climatic and anthropogenic factors affected Regeneration capacity of the two species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚基利菲县米达溪红树林Avicennia Marina和Bruguiera Gymnorrhiza的结构和自然更新能力评价
研究了基利菲县米达溪中Avicennia marina和Bruguiera gymnorrhiza两种植物的结构、自然更新能力和生物制剂。本研究采用横断面和描述性研究设计。与Bruguiera gymnorrhiza种相比,Avicennia marina种具有更大的优势,其复杂性指数(A2.7, B0.4),基底面积(A588cm2, B484cm2)和平均高度(A26m, B10m)均为聚集分散模式。在旱季,木藤种高与直径的相关系数为0.56,木藤种高与直径的相关系数为0.78。在雨季,两者的相关系数为0.67。木榄种的直杆数多于木榄种,其中木榄种的直杆数为75.3%,木榄树种的直杆数为1.7%。水杨树和裸木均具有较好的更新能力,幼苗数量大于幼树,幼树数量小于成熟树。Littoraria scabra主要以微生物和藻类为食,Littoraria Glabrata主要以泥面为食,Sesarma guttata和Sesarma leptosoma以红树林叶片为食,Cerithidea decollata以沉积物和有机物为食,Terebralia palustris和Selatium elongatium以藻类和叶片为食,Sesasrmi ortmanni、Metopograpsus oceanicus和Neosarmatium meinerti以叶片和幼繁殖体为食,Barnacles和Oyster束以gymnorrhiza的根和茎为食。生物因子对木犀草和木犀草的再生能力影响不显著,而气候因子和人为因子对木犀草和木犀草的再生能力影响较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Species Composition, Abundance and Population Structure of Indoor Resting Mosquitoes in Two Villages of Sudan Genetic Diversity of Eristalis Tenax (Linnaeus, 1758) as Insect Pollinator of Prunus Persica (L.) Stokes Flowers Based on MtcoⅠ Gene Note on Ceropegia attenuata Hook. From Western Ghats, India Dynamic Connectedness and Hedging Opportunity Nexus between Clean Energy, Crude Oil and Technology Sector Inference from Open-Source Sequence Data on the Genetic Epidemiology of COVID-19 Infection in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1