Photography: To the Problem of Thing

IF 0.1 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21638/spbu15.2022.204
E. Vasilyeva
{"title":"Photography: To the Problem of Thing","authors":"E. Vasilyeva","doi":"10.21638/spbu15.2022.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the problem of image and object in photography. The study proceeds from the assumption that the presentation of a thing implies its special status in photography. The article considers the position of things in photography as a semantic and ideological problem. A photographic demonstration of an object can be interpreted as a special pictorial strategy. The thing is the condition of the shot: a photography is impossible without an object. The problem of the relationship between photography and things looks like a large-scale contradiction. Photography fundamentally changes the object both visually and qualitatively. Acquiring the status of an image, a thing loses its material qualities. The object in the frame is deprived not only of its practical meaning — it loses its subject program. From a three-dimensional object, a thing turns into an ephemeral and phantom unit. The thing as a given experience in photography becomes an illusion. The constituted qualities of the subject are lost in the frame. In photography, a thing becomes a false distorted image, an element of a deceptive perception of the world. The subject in the photograph is an ephemeral entity, an imaginary and non-existent phantom. The frame verifies the presence of the object and, at the same time, endows the meaning of the authentic that which is not. Within the framework of this study, it is important that the status of a thing in photography is not only possessed by an object with strict outlines and boundaries. The disembodied and formless acquire the quality of an object in photography. The study draws attention to the fact that photography turns the world into a set of units, where the quality of a thing is possessed not only by the object, but also by the surrounding space.","PeriodicalId":40378,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2022.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the problem of image and object in photography. The study proceeds from the assumption that the presentation of a thing implies its special status in photography. The article considers the position of things in photography as a semantic and ideological problem. A photographic demonstration of an object can be interpreted as a special pictorial strategy. The thing is the condition of the shot: a photography is impossible without an object. The problem of the relationship between photography and things looks like a large-scale contradiction. Photography fundamentally changes the object both visually and qualitatively. Acquiring the status of an image, a thing loses its material qualities. The object in the frame is deprived not only of its practical meaning — it loses its subject program. From a three-dimensional object, a thing turns into an ephemeral and phantom unit. The thing as a given experience in photography becomes an illusion. The constituted qualities of the subject are lost in the frame. In photography, a thing becomes a false distorted image, an element of a deceptive perception of the world. The subject in the photograph is an ephemeral entity, an imaginary and non-existent phantom. The frame verifies the presence of the object and, at the same time, endows the meaning of the authentic that which is not. Within the framework of this study, it is important that the status of a thing in photography is not only possessed by an object with strict outlines and boundaries. The disembodied and formless acquire the quality of an object in photography. The study draws attention to the fact that photography turns the world into a set of units, where the quality of a thing is possessed not only by the object, but also by the surrounding space.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摄影:事物的问题
本文分析了摄影中的物象问题。研究的出发点是一个假设,即一个事物的呈现意味着它在摄影中的特殊地位。文章将事物在摄影中的位置视为一个语义学和意识形态问题。一个物体的摄影演示可以被解释为一种特殊的图像策略。问题在于拍摄的条件:没有对象,摄影是不可能的。摄影与事物的关系问题看起来像是一个大范围的矛盾。摄影从根本上改变了物体的视觉和质量。一件事物获得了形象的地位,就失去了它的物质性质。框架中的对象不仅被剥夺了它的实际意义,而且失去了它的主体程序。从一个三维的物体,一个东西变成了一个短暂的、虚幻的单位。作为给定经验的事物在摄影中变成了一种幻觉。主体的构成特质在画面中消失了。在摄影中,一个东西变成了一个虚假的扭曲的图像,一个对世界的欺骗性感知的元素。照片中的主体是一个短暂的实体,一个想象的和不存在的幻影。框架验证对象的存在,同时赋予不存在的真实的意义。在本研究的框架内,重要的是,一个事物在摄影中的地位不仅仅是由一个具有严格轮廓和边界的物体所拥有。在摄影中,无实体和无形的东西获得了物体的品质。该研究提请人们注意这样一个事实,即摄影将世界变成了一组单元,其中事物的质量不仅由物体拥有,而且由周围的空间拥有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Sources of Figurenlehren of the Baroque Era in Musicology of the German Language Space Reproduction Technology. From Replica to Brand The Pragmatics of Romanticism. Edmund Burke as Art Theorist The Pavan in English Music of the 16th–17th Centuries Tapestry Art in Buryatia: Experience and Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1