Making sense of methods – a conversation about qualitative research in library and information studies

IF 0.1 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Libres-Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal Pub Date : 2018-02-02 DOI:10.29173/LIRG754
E. Abbott-Halpin, A. Bryant
{"title":"Making sense of methods – a conversation about qualitative research in library and information studies","authors":"E. Abbott-Halpin, A. Bryant","doi":"10.29173/LIRG754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently there is an embarrassment of riches with regards to research in areas such as library and information studies [LIS] – a range of possibilities, both qualitative and quantitative – added to which we now have the potential for ‘mixed methods’ and the lure of ‘Big Data’ as a resourced that appears to offer a readily available and potentially fruitful basis for investigative studies. All of this provides a rich body of resources for researchers, but this abundance also has a downside leading to confusion and perplexity. Contributions such as this special issue are intended to resolve and ameliorate this, and so we seek to address some of these issues in the form of an interchange between two researchers with interests that include, but are not limited to, research in LIS. The aim of this is to seek some clarification of key issues involved; although we realize that this is unlikely to provide any definitive outcome, it may assist those seeking some guidance on these matters.","PeriodicalId":41898,"journal":{"name":"Libres-Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"4-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libres-Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/LIRG754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently there is an embarrassment of riches with regards to research in areas such as library and information studies [LIS] – a range of possibilities, both qualitative and quantitative – added to which we now have the potential for ‘mixed methods’ and the lure of ‘Big Data’ as a resourced that appears to offer a readily available and potentially fruitful basis for investigative studies. All of this provides a rich body of resources for researchers, but this abundance also has a downside leading to confusion and perplexity. Contributions such as this special issue are intended to resolve and ameliorate this, and so we seek to address some of these issues in the form of an interchange between two researchers with interests that include, but are not limited to, research in LIS. The aim of this is to seek some clarification of key issues involved; although we realize that this is unlikely to provide any definitive outcome, it may assist those seeking some guidance on these matters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使方法有意义-关于图书馆和信息研究中的定性研究的对话
目前,在图书馆和信息学等领域的研究中,存在着一种令人尴尬的财富——一系列定性和定量的可能性——加上我们现在有“混合方法”的潜力,以及“大数据”作为一种资源的诱惑,它似乎为调查研究提供了一个现成的、潜在的富有成效的基础。所有这些都为研究人员提供了丰富的资源,但这种丰富也有一个缺点,导致混乱和困惑。诸如这一特殊问题的贡献旨在解决和改善这一问题,因此我们寻求以两位研究人员之间的交流形式解决其中的一些问题,这些研究人员的兴趣包括但不限于LIS的研究。这样做的目的是设法澄清所涉及的关键问题;虽然我们意识到这不太可能提供任何明确的结果,但它可能有助于那些在这些问题上寻求一些指导的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: LIBRES is an international refereed electronic journal devoted to new research in Library and Information Science. Libres is distributed through a listserver, and an ftp site. Listserver subscribers are notified of new issues through the distribution of a table of contents to LIBRES, LIBREF-L, and any other e-conferences requesting the service.
期刊最新文献
Peer-led literacy: a prison library’s collaboration with the Shannon Trust Beyond the search process: Exploring the affective stages in developing a research proposal A reach/significance cross-over: a strategy for demonstrating the impact of our research Blended professionals: the problem of legitimacy for UK librarians as teachers in Higher Education Scotland's public libraries are nothing but practical when it comes to deselection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1