Religious freedom: thinking sociologically

IF 1.3 0 RELIGION Religion State & Society Pub Date : 2022-05-27 DOI:10.1080/09637494.2022.2112886
Olga Breskaya, G. Giordan, Siniša Zrinščak
{"title":"Religious freedom: thinking sociologically","authors":"Olga Breskaya, G. Giordan, Siniša Zrinščak","doi":"10.1080/09637494.2022.2112886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sociology’s engagement with the religious freedom agenda is a comparatively new enterprise compared to legal and political science scholarship. The five contributions included in this collection continue the debate about the role of sociological theory and methods in defining, interpreting, and implementing religious freedom in modern societies. By articulating sociological sensitivity and readiness to address existing lacunae in the social-scientific study of religious freedom, we argue that research attention has to be focused equally on the historical contexts and structural conditions in which religious freedom is implemented, as well as on the multiple stakeholders and socio-religious dynamics of the societies involved. A brief description of five contributions that bring data and cases from Italy and Russia, Iran, Israel, South Korea, and the United States is presented, indicating how they highlight the importance of scholarly attempts to theorise and measure religious freedom sociologically.","PeriodicalId":45069,"journal":{"name":"Religion State & Society","volume":"4 1","pages":"246 - 253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion State & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2022.2112886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sociology’s engagement with the religious freedom agenda is a comparatively new enterprise compared to legal and political science scholarship. The five contributions included in this collection continue the debate about the role of sociological theory and methods in defining, interpreting, and implementing religious freedom in modern societies. By articulating sociological sensitivity and readiness to address existing lacunae in the social-scientific study of religious freedom, we argue that research attention has to be focused equally on the historical contexts and structural conditions in which religious freedom is implemented, as well as on the multiple stakeholders and socio-religious dynamics of the societies involved. A brief description of five contributions that bring data and cases from Italy and Russia, Iran, Israel, South Korea, and the United States is presented, indicating how they highlight the importance of scholarly attempts to theorise and measure religious freedom sociologically.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教自由:社会学思考
与法学和政治学学术相比,社会学对宗教自由议程的参与是一项相对较新的事业。本书收录的五篇文章继续讨论社会学理论和方法在定义、解释和实现现代社会宗教自由中的作用。通过阐明社会学的敏感性和准备解决宗教自由社会科学研究中的现有空白,我们认为,研究注意力必须平等地集中在宗教自由实施的历史背景和结构条件上,以及所涉及的社会的多个利益相关者和社会宗教动态。简要介绍了来自意大利、俄罗斯、伊朗、以色列、韩国和美国的数据和案例的五份贡献,表明它们如何突出学术尝试的重要性,以社会学的方式理论化和衡量宗教自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Religion, State & Society has a long-established reputation as the leading English-language academic publication focusing on communist and formerly communist countries throughout the world, and the legacy of the encounter between religion and communism. To augment this brief Religion, State & Society has now expanded its coverage to include religious developments in countries which have not experienced communist rule, and to treat wider themes in a more systematic way. The journal encourages a comparative approach where appropriate, with the aim of revealing similarities and differences in the historical and current experience of countries, regions and religions, in stability or in transition.
期刊最新文献
Unsettled grounds: religion, gender and sexual nationalism in a Dutch city. Confessional culture, religiosity, and traditionalism: tracing the influence of religion on public attitudes towards European integration Conflict and coexistence among minorities within minority religions: a case study of Tablighi Jama’at in Japan Editors’ introduction Rage and carnage in the name of God: religious violence in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1