Effects of biological flocculation technology (BFT) on water quality dynamics and immune response of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Aquaculture and Fisheries Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aaf.2023.04.005
{"title":"Effects of biological flocculation technology (BFT) on water quality dynamics and immune response of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.aaf.2023.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The biofloc technology (BFT) offers benefits in improving feed utilization and reducing the feed conversion ratio compared to the recirculating aquaculture system (RAS). In this study, high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing was employed to investigate and compare the bacterial communities in these aquaculture systems and the gut microbiota of grass carp reared in them. We observed a significant distinction between the microbial communities of the aquaculture systems and the intestinal microbiota of grass carp. The genera <em>cetobacterium</em> and <em>bacillus</em> were more abundant in the BFT system, accounting for only 0.05% and 0.25% in the RAS. Our study also demonstrated that BFT could influence the intestinal microorganisms of grass carp (<em>Ctenopharyngodon Idella</em>) by reducing the relative abundance of <em>burkholderia</em>-<em>caballeronia</em>-<em>paraburkholderia</em> and increasing that of <em>cetobacterium</em>. Based on bugBase community predictions, the potential pathogenicity in BFT and grass carp intestine was lower than in RAS. Regarding gene expression in the grass carp intestine, immunosuppressive genes showed higher expression, while pro-inflammatory genes exhibited lower expression in grass carp reared in BFT. Furthermore, the final average length and weight of grass carp in the BFT system were significantly higher than those in the RAS. This study provides valuable insights into gut microbiome ecology in relation to two grass carp aquaculture systems, which could be effectively applied in grass carp management to promote health and improve water quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36894,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture and Fisheries","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 921-928"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468550X23000692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The biofloc technology (BFT) offers benefits in improving feed utilization and reducing the feed conversion ratio compared to the recirculating aquaculture system (RAS). In this study, high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing was employed to investigate and compare the bacterial communities in these aquaculture systems and the gut microbiota of grass carp reared in them. We observed a significant distinction between the microbial communities of the aquaculture systems and the intestinal microbiota of grass carp. The genera cetobacterium and bacillus were more abundant in the BFT system, accounting for only 0.05% and 0.25% in the RAS. Our study also demonstrated that BFT could influence the intestinal microorganisms of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon Idella) by reducing the relative abundance of burkholderia-caballeronia-paraburkholderia and increasing that of cetobacterium. Based on bugBase community predictions, the potential pathogenicity in BFT and grass carp intestine was lower than in RAS. Regarding gene expression in the grass carp intestine, immunosuppressive genes showed higher expression, while pro-inflammatory genes exhibited lower expression in grass carp reared in BFT. Furthermore, the final average length and weight of grass carp in the BFT system were significantly higher than those in the RAS. This study provides valuable insights into gut microbiome ecology in relation to two grass carp aquaculture systems, which could be effectively applied in grass carp management to promote health and improve water quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物絮凝技术(BFT)对草鱼水质动态和免疫反应的影响
与循环水养殖系统(RAS)相比,生物絮团技术(BFT)在提高饲料利用率和降低饲料转化率方面具有优势。本研究采用高通量 16S rRNA 基因测序技术,研究并比较了这些水产养殖系统中的细菌群落以及在其中饲养的草鱼的肠道微生物群落。我们观察到水产养殖系统的微生物群落与草鱼肠道微生物群落之间存在明显差异。在 BFT 系统中,鲸杆菌属和芽孢杆菌属的数量更多,而在 RAS 系统中仅占 0.05% 和 0.25%。我们的研究还表明,BFT 可以通过降低burkholderia-caballeronia-paraburkholderia 的相对丰度和提高 cetobacterium 的相对丰度来影响草鱼(Ctenopharyngodon Idella)的肠道微生物。根据 bugBase 群落预测,BFT 和草鱼肠道的潜在致病性低于 RAS。在草鱼肠道基因表达方面,BFT饲养草鱼的免疫抑制基因表达较高,而促炎基因表达较低。此外,BFT 系统中草鱼的最终平均体长和体重明显高于 RAS 系统。本研究提供了有关两种草鱼养殖系统的肠道微生物组生态学的宝贵见解,可有效地应用于草鱼管理,以促进健康和改善水质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aquaculture and Fisheries
Aquaculture and Fisheries Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Stability analysis of reef fish communities based on symbiotic graph model Effects of microbe-derived antioxidants on growth, digestive and aminotransferase activities, and antioxidant capacities in the hepatopancreas of Eriocheir sinensis under ammonia nitrogen stress Synergistic effects of Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS) with combination of clear water, probiotic and biofloc technology: A review Biofloc system supplemented by Pseudoalteromonas piscicida 1Ub protects the Pacific white shrimp Penaeus vannamei from Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection Used vs. new: Does it have consequences for the performance of fishing gear?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1