The interaction effect of auditor industry specialisation and board governance on financial reporting timeliness: evidence from the UAE

Mohammed Ali Almuzaiqer, Maslina Ahmad, A. Fatima
{"title":"The interaction effect of auditor industry specialisation and board governance on financial reporting timeliness: evidence from the UAE","authors":"Mohammed Ali Almuzaiqer, Maslina Ahmad, A. Fatima","doi":"10.1108/jeas-03-2022-0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study investigates how the timeliness of financial reporting by listed companies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is influenced by the interaction effect between industry-specialist auditors and board governance.Design/methodology/approachThe Emirati capital markets – the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX) and the Dubai Financial Market (DFM) – were used to obtain the data, which covered the seven-year period between 2011 and 2017. In total, 385 observations were obtained. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression were the principal statistical tests employed using the panel data method.FindingsThe results of the direct effect tests reveal that board independence and industry-specialist auditors have no significant influence on financial reporting timeliness. Nevertheless, the results also show that the timeliness of financial reporting by listed companies in the UAE is influenced by the interaction effect between auditors' industry specialisation and the governance of firm boards. More specifically, the results reveal that financial reporting timeliness is positively associated with board independence for companies audited by industry-specialist auditors. This finding is consistent with the notion that industry-specialist auditors complement the role of effective board governance.Research limitations/implicationsThis study only focuses on secondary data from non-financial companies listed in the UAE markets. Therefore, the outcomes may not be generalisable to sectors related to finance. Future researchers are recommended to examine financial sectors and apply alternative measurements such as surveys or interviews with directorial boards and external auditors. Furthermore, this study used only one measure of industry-specialist auditors, while board governance was limited to board independence. Future studies could utilise different measurements for industry-specialist auditors and more board governance measures to obtain more robust findings.Practical implicationsThe evidence provided indicates that when a company listed in the UAE has a high-quality board, it benefits by engaging auditors who specialise in the industry in terms of improving the timeliness of financial reporting. The findings also indicate the need for closer monitoring of management to safeguard their reputation. This might attract the attention of the Big Four audit firms and industry–specialist auditors to continuously re-evaluate their audit work, professional training and staff skills, while they might also try to differentiate their performance and monitoring capabilities from the non-Big Four audit firms and non-industry specialist auditors.Originality/valueThe main contribution of this study to the overall body of research is the concept that having independent directors is associated with improved reporting timeliness because financial reports are monitored with greater efficiency by industry–specialist auditors. This study provides evidence for the interaction effect between internal and external governance mechanisms on financial reporting quality, which has not been the focus of prior studies on financial reporting quality.","PeriodicalId":44018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-03-2022-0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study investigates how the timeliness of financial reporting by listed companies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is influenced by the interaction effect between industry-specialist auditors and board governance.Design/methodology/approachThe Emirati capital markets – the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX) and the Dubai Financial Market (DFM) – were used to obtain the data, which covered the seven-year period between 2011 and 2017. In total, 385 observations were obtained. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression were the principal statistical tests employed using the panel data method.FindingsThe results of the direct effect tests reveal that board independence and industry-specialist auditors have no significant influence on financial reporting timeliness. Nevertheless, the results also show that the timeliness of financial reporting by listed companies in the UAE is influenced by the interaction effect between auditors' industry specialisation and the governance of firm boards. More specifically, the results reveal that financial reporting timeliness is positively associated with board independence for companies audited by industry-specialist auditors. This finding is consistent with the notion that industry-specialist auditors complement the role of effective board governance.Research limitations/implicationsThis study only focuses on secondary data from non-financial companies listed in the UAE markets. Therefore, the outcomes may not be generalisable to sectors related to finance. Future researchers are recommended to examine financial sectors and apply alternative measurements such as surveys or interviews with directorial boards and external auditors. Furthermore, this study used only one measure of industry-specialist auditors, while board governance was limited to board independence. Future studies could utilise different measurements for industry-specialist auditors and more board governance measures to obtain more robust findings.Practical implicationsThe evidence provided indicates that when a company listed in the UAE has a high-quality board, it benefits by engaging auditors who specialise in the industry in terms of improving the timeliness of financial reporting. The findings also indicate the need for closer monitoring of management to safeguard their reputation. This might attract the attention of the Big Four audit firms and industry–specialist auditors to continuously re-evaluate their audit work, professional training and staff skills, while they might also try to differentiate their performance and monitoring capabilities from the non-Big Four audit firms and non-industry specialist auditors.Originality/valueThe main contribution of this study to the overall body of research is the concept that having independent directors is associated with improved reporting timeliness because financial reports are monitored with greater efficiency by industry–specialist auditors. This study provides evidence for the interaction effect between internal and external governance mechanisms on financial reporting quality, which has not been the focus of prior studies on financial reporting quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计师行业专业化和董事会治理对财务报告及时性的交互影响:来自阿联酋的证据
目的研究阿联酋上市公司财务报告的及时性如何受到行业专业审计师和董事会治理之间互动效应的影响。设计/方法/方法阿联酋资本市场——阿布扎比证券交易所(ADX)和迪拜金融市场(DFM)——用于获取2011年至2017年7年期间的数据。总共获得了385个观测值。使用面板数据法,描述性统计和多元回归是主要的统计检验。结果表明,董事会独立性和行业专业审计师对财务报告及时性没有显著影响。然而,研究结果也表明,阿联酋上市公司财务报告的及时性受到审计师行业专业化和公司董事会治理之间的互动效应的影响。更具体地说,结果显示,财务报告及时性与由行业专业审计师审计的公司的董事会独立性正相关。这一发现与行业专家审计师补充有效董事会治理作用的观点是一致的。本研究仅关注在阿联酋市场上市的非金融公司的二手数据。因此,研究结果可能不适用于与金融相关的部门。建议未来的研究人员检查金融部门,并采用其他测量方法,如调查或采访董事董事会和外部审计师。此外,本研究仅使用了行业专业审计师的一种衡量标准,而董事会治理仅限于董事会独立性。未来的研究可以利用对行业专业审计师的不同测量和更多的董事会治理措施,以获得更有力的发现。所提供的证据表明,当一家在阿联酋上市的公司拥有一个高质量的董事会时,就提高财务报告的及时性而言,它会通过聘请专业的审计师而受益。调查结果还表明,需要更密切地监督管理层,以维护其声誉。这可能会引起四大审计事务所和行业专业审计师的注意,不断重新评估他们的审计工作、专业培训和员工技能,同时他们也可能试图将他们的绩效和监测能力与非四大审计事务所和非行业专业审计师区分开来。独创性/价值本研究对整体研究的主要贡献是,独立董事与报告及时性的提高有关,因为财务报告由行业专业审计师更有效地监督。本研究为内部和外部治理机制对财务报告质量的交互作用提供了证据,这是以往财务报告质量研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
83
期刊最新文献
Understanding the impact of ethical leadership on followers' voice: mediation of moral identity and moderation of proactive personality Do agency costs and business risk affect the corporate sustainability–financial performance relationship? Investigating nostalgia’s influence on brand love Influence of governance indicators on public debt accumulation in Africa Analysing volatility patterns in emerging markets: symmetric or asymmetric models?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1