Blended Approach to Physics Problem-Solving Using Conventional and Virtual Labs: A Survey of Student’s Perception

Mamta Pal, Rinki
{"title":"Blended Approach to Physics Problem-Solving Using Conventional and Virtual Labs: A Survey of Student’s Perception","authors":"Mamta Pal, Rinki","doi":"10.46627/silet.v3i1.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physics education entails rigorous problem-solving. But physics is full of abstraction and mathematical representations, which are hard to visualize. Hence, understanding the problems requires constant lab activities essential to physics problem-solving. But due to limited equipment and limited periods of usage in conventional labs, virtual labs are an alternative with their own set of limitations. So, a blend of the two virtual and conventional labs is a better option for problem-solving. A mixed-method approach was adopted to know the perception of higher secondary students towards this blended approach. For this, 150 CBSE board higher secondary students of science stream selected using convenient sampling from Lucknow were surveyed using a Likert-type perception scale comprising 15 items followed by an unstructured interview to know the preferred mode for physics problem-solving. The data so obtained were expressed in percentages. The study revealed that most students agreed with the overall perceived benefits of using conventional and virtual labs separately. But due to the inherent problems of these labs separately, students perceived the benefits offered by the blend of conventional and virtual labs in physics problem-solving more than using them separately. A blend of conventional and virtual labs should be used more often.","PeriodicalId":34708,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Learning and Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Learning and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v3i1.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Physics education entails rigorous problem-solving. But physics is full of abstraction and mathematical representations, which are hard to visualize. Hence, understanding the problems requires constant lab activities essential to physics problem-solving. But due to limited equipment and limited periods of usage in conventional labs, virtual labs are an alternative with their own set of limitations. So, a blend of the two virtual and conventional labs is a better option for problem-solving. A mixed-method approach was adopted to know the perception of higher secondary students towards this blended approach. For this, 150 CBSE board higher secondary students of science stream selected using convenient sampling from Lucknow were surveyed using a Likert-type perception scale comprising 15 items followed by an unstructured interview to know the preferred mode for physics problem-solving. The data so obtained were expressed in percentages. The study revealed that most students agreed with the overall perceived benefits of using conventional and virtual labs separately. But due to the inherent problems of these labs separately, students perceived the benefits offered by the blend of conventional and virtual labs in physics problem-solving more than using them separately. A blend of conventional and virtual labs should be used more often.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用传统和虚拟实验室解决物理问题的混合方法:学生感知的调查
物理教育需要严格解决问题。但物理学充满了抽象和数学表征,难以形象化。因此,理解这些问题需要不断的实验室活动,这对解决物理问题至关重要。但是由于传统实验室的设备和使用时间有限,虚拟实验室是一种有其自身局限性的替代方案。因此,虚拟实验室和传统实验室的结合是解决问题的更好选择。采用混合方法来了解中学生对这种混合方法的看法。为此,从勒克瑙抽取了150名CBSE理科高中学生,采用李克特感知量表(包括15个项目)进行了调查,随后进行了非结构化访谈,以了解物理问题解决的首选模式。所得数据以百分数表示。研究显示,大多数学生都同意将传统实验室和虚拟实验室分开使用的总体好处。但是,由于这些实验室各自存在固有的问题,学生们认为传统实验室和虚拟实验室的结合在解决物理问题方面比单独使用它们更有好处。应该更多地使用传统实验室和虚拟实验室的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Antithesis of Human Rater: Psychometric Responding to Shifts Competency Test Assessment Using Automation (AES System) Gender Based Teacher Directive Speech Acts in Religious Learning Process at Islamic High School Differentiated Teaching Module for Indonesian Language Based on Graphological Analysis of Letter I, R, G Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Digital E-Scaffolding for Special School Teachers Learning Transfer in the Workplace: An Insight Into the Missing Link in the Education and Training of Employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1