Patchwork disclosure: Divergent public access and personal privacy across criminal record disclosure policy in the United States

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Law & Policy Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1111/lapo.12193
Juan R. Sandoval, Sarah E. Lageson
{"title":"Patchwork disclosure: Divergent public access and personal privacy across criminal record disclosure policy in the United States","authors":"Juan R. Sandoval,&nbsp;Sarah E. Lageson","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scholars have paid minimal attention to state statutory guidance that allows criminal justice agencies to disclose records that contain personal information about arrestees, defendants, and incarcerated people. We analyze US state policy for police, courts, prisons, and record repositories (<i>N</i> = 200). Most states restrict access to compiled criminal histories, but nearly all allow broad public access to agency records. Divergent policy guidance accounts for these differences, where transparency laws govern agency records while state criminal codes regulate records of arrest and prosecution, otherwise known as RAP sheets. These policy differences contribute to widespread disclosures of non-conviction records, raising questions about due process and inequality in the big data age.</p>","PeriodicalId":47050,"journal":{"name":"Law & Policy","volume":"44 3","pages":"255-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12193","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Scholars have paid minimal attention to state statutory guidance that allows criminal justice agencies to disclose records that contain personal information about arrestees, defendants, and incarcerated people. We analyze US state policy for police, courts, prisons, and record repositories (N = 200). Most states restrict access to compiled criminal histories, but nearly all allow broad public access to agency records. Divergent policy guidance accounts for these differences, where transparency laws govern agency records while state criminal codes regulate records of arrest and prosecution, otherwise known as RAP sheets. These policy differences contribute to widespread disclosures of non-conviction records, raising questions about due process and inequality in the big data age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拼凑式披露:美国犯罪记录披露政策中不同的公众获取和个人隐私
学者们很少关注允许刑事司法机构披露包含被捕者、被告和被监禁者个人信息的记录的州法律指导。我们分析了美国警察、法院、监狱和档案库的国家政策(N = 200)。大多数州限制查阅犯罪记录汇编,但几乎所有州都允许公众查阅机构的记录。不同的政策指导解释了这些差异,透明法律管理机构记录,而州刑法管理逮捕和起诉记录,也称为RAP表。这些政策差异导致了非定罪记录的广泛披露,引发了人们对大数据时代正当程序和不平等的质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: International and interdisciplinary in scope, Law & Policy embraces varied research methodologies that interrogate law, governance, and public policy worldwide. Law & Policy makes a vital contribution to the current dialogue on contemporary policy by publishing innovative, peer-reviewed articles on such critical topics as • government and self-regulation • health • environment • family • gender • taxation and finance • legal decision-making • criminal justice • human rights
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Does racial impact statement reform reduce Black–White disparities in imprisonment: Mixed methods evidence from Minnesota Stewards, defenders, progenitors, and collaborators: Courts in the age of democratic decline Judicial transformation in a competitive authoritarian regime: Evidence from the Turkish case Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1