LEGALLY SIGNIFICANT ACTIONS AS A TOOL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: THEORETICAL AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTICS AND EXAMPLES

A. Antonenko
{"title":"LEGALLY SIGNIFICANT ACTIONS AS A TOOL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: THEORETICAL AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTICS AND EXAMPLES","authors":"A. Antonenko","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The purpose of the article is to determine the essence of legally significant actions as atool of public administration through the theoretical and legal characterization of their featuresand the analysis of examples by which certain actions can or, on the contrary, can’t be attributedto them.Methods. The research methodology consists of general and special methods of scientificknowledge, among which the main ones are comparative legal (for comparing scientific views andlegal provisions), analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction (when studying the signs of thetools of public administration and attributing to their specific types of individual actions committedby subjects of public administration), systemic-structural (the use of which is conditioned by theneed for a systematic and consistent study of the essence of legally significant actions and thepossibility of attributing certain tools of public administration to them), formal-logical (duringresearch of the content of features of administrative acts enshrined in law and the consistency ofscientific points of view with them) etc.Results. The first section of the article examines the main features of legally significant actions,established in law and proposed in scientific sources. The impracticality of attributing to themactions that do not lead to legal consequences is substantiated. An example of legally significantactions committed in the form of inactivity of public administration subjects is given.In the second section of the article, examples of the use of tools-actions of subjects of publicadministration are analyzed for a visual demonstration of the possibility of classifying certainactions of public administration as legally significant. In this context, the actions of the publicadministration on the implementation of the initiative on the purchase of private property objectsfor public needs, the voting carried out at the meetings of public administration subjects, includingthe decision on the purchase of private property objects for public needs, are considered.Conclusions. In the conclusions, the concept of legally significant actions is proposed as a formof administrative acts enshrined in the Law of Ukraine “On administrative procedure”, theexpression of which is the actions or inactions of subjects of public administration, providedat the regulatory level, which are characterized by all the features of this category of tools ofpublic administration without exception. It is emphasized that one of their features is that in certain cases, in order to achieve the result of the performance of the powers entrusted to thepublic administration, they must be applied in combination with administrative acts in the formof decisions. The most expressive examples of legally significant actions are listed. Proposals forimproving the legal regulation of administrative acts have been formulated.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative law and process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to determine the essence of legally significant actions as atool of public administration through the theoretical and legal characterization of their featuresand the analysis of examples by which certain actions can or, on the contrary, can’t be attributedto them.Methods. The research methodology consists of general and special methods of scientificknowledge, among which the main ones are comparative legal (for comparing scientific views andlegal provisions), analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction (when studying the signs of thetools of public administration and attributing to their specific types of individual actions committedby subjects of public administration), systemic-structural (the use of which is conditioned by theneed for a systematic and consistent study of the essence of legally significant actions and thepossibility of attributing certain tools of public administration to them), formal-logical (duringresearch of the content of features of administrative acts enshrined in law and the consistency ofscientific points of view with them) etc.Results. The first section of the article examines the main features of legally significant actions,established in law and proposed in scientific sources. The impracticality of attributing to themactions that do not lead to legal consequences is substantiated. An example of legally significantactions committed in the form of inactivity of public administration subjects is given.In the second section of the article, examples of the use of tools-actions of subjects of publicadministration are analyzed for a visual demonstration of the possibility of classifying certainactions of public administration as legally significant. In this context, the actions of the publicadministration on the implementation of the initiative on the purchase of private property objectsfor public needs, the voting carried out at the meetings of public administration subjects, includingthe decision on the purchase of private property objects for public needs, are considered.Conclusions. In the conclusions, the concept of legally significant actions is proposed as a formof administrative acts enshrined in the Law of Ukraine “On administrative procedure”, theexpression of which is the actions or inactions of subjects of public administration, providedat the regulatory level, which are characterized by all the features of this category of tools ofpublic administration without exception. It is emphasized that one of their features is that in certain cases, in order to achieve the result of the performance of the powers entrusted to thepublic administration, they must be applied in combination with administrative acts in the formof decisions. The most expressive examples of legally significant actions are listed. Proposals forimproving the legal regulation of administrative acts have been formulated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为公共行政工具的具有法律意义的行为:理论和法律特征及实例
目的。本文的目的是通过对具有法律意义的公共行政工具行为特征的理论和法律定性,以及对某些行为可以归因于或相反不能归因于这些行为的实例分析,来确定具有法律意义的公共行政工具行为的本质。研究方法包括科学知识的一般方法和特殊方法,其中主要有比较法(用于比较科学观点和法律规定)、分析与综合、演绎与归纳法(研究公共行政工具的标志并将其归因于公共行政主体的具体个人行为类型);系统-结构(其使用的条件是需要对具有法律意义的行为的本质进行系统和一致的研究,并将某些公共行政工具归因于这些行为的可能性),形式-逻辑(在研究法律规定的行政行为的特征内容及其科学观点的一致性时)等。文章的第一部分考察了法律上确立的和科学文献中提出的具有法律意义的行为的主要特征。将不会导致法律后果的行为归罪于他们是不现实的。以公共行政主体的不作为为例,列举了具有法律意义的行为。在文章的第二部分中,分析了公共行政主体的行为这一工具的使用实例,以直观地展示将某些公共行政行为分类为具有法律意义的可能性。在此背景下,对公共行政部门关于实施公共需要购置私有财产物品倡议的行动、公共行政主体会议上进行的表决,包括关于公共需要购置私有财产物品的决定等进行了考察。在结论部分,提出了具有法律意义的行为的概念,作为乌克兰《行政程序法》所规定的一种行政行为形式,其表达是公共行政主体的作为或不作为,提供了监管层面,无一例外地具有这类公共行政工具的所有特征。强调其特点之一是,在某些情况下,为了实现赋予公共行政的权力的行使结果,必须以决定的形式与行政行为相结合。下面列出了最具代表性的具有法律意义的行为。提出完善行政行为法律规制的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOME ISSUES OF INSTANCE JURISDICTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUNCTIONING OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS UNDER MARITAL LAW THE LEGAL ESSENCE OF THE ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE: A BRIEF COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS PECULIARITIES OF DETERMINING THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENSE COUNCIL OF UKRAINE AS A SUBJECT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION THE LAW ON FOOD SECURITY OF UKRAINE AS A LEGAL BASIS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE FIELD OF ENSURING FOOD SECURITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1