Application of multi-mode combined analgesia in the early stage of non-operative treatment of traumatic rib fractures in adults

Yang Yang, Tie-Quan Sui
{"title":"Application of multi-mode combined analgesia in the early stage of non-operative treatment of traumatic rib fractures in adults","authors":"Yang Yang, Tie-Quan Sui","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-4497.2019.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the analgesic effect of a new combined analgesic mode in the early stage of non-operative treatment of adult traumatic rib fractures. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 93 patients with rib fractures who did not receive surgical treatment from January 2014 to January 2018 were prospectively included, and randomly divided into the traditional analgesia group, subcutaneous analgesia group and combined analgesia group(31 cases each). There were 56 males and 37 females totally with a median age of(47.3±13.2)years. All patients have moderate to severe pain with VAS scores greater than 5. Traditional analgesia group: lornoxicam 8 mg intravenous injection twice daily. Subcutaneous analgesia group: only subcutaneous self-controlled analgesia pump was used for treatment. Combined analgesia group: on the basis of the traditional analgesia group, subcutaneous self-controlled analgesia pump was added for treatment, and the dosage of the pump drug was the same as that of subcutaneous analgesia group. The VAS scores at tranquillization and cough were compared before analgesia treatment(T1), 24 h(T2), 48 h(T3) and 72 h(T4) after analgesic treatment in each group during bed brake within 3 days after injury. The VAS scores after 78 hours of analgesic treatment during ambulation were compared. When sudden pain with VAS score greater than 7 occurred within 72 hours of bed staying treatment in each group, the average daily use times of bucinnazine hydrochloride 100mg remedial analgesia were compared. The number of adverse reactions such as nausea and pneumonia in each group was compared. \n \n \nResults \nThe VAS scores of resting pain and cough pain at the observation time point(T2-T4) in the combined analgesia group were better than those in the subcutaneous analgesia group and the traditional analgesia group, showing a significant difference(P<0.05). When getting out of bed, there were significant differences in pain scores among the three groups, and the pain score of the combined analgesia group was the lowest. There was a significant difference among the three groups in the number of daily additions of bucinnazine hydrochloride during remedial analgesia(P<0.05), the combined analgesia group was the least. Between the two groups of patients using analgesic pump, the number of self-compressions in the combined analgesia group was lower than that in the subcutaneous analgesia group(P<0.05). The incidence of pneumonia in the combined analgesia group was lower than that in the other two groups and the incidence of other adverse reactions such as nausea was lower than that in the simple analgesia group. \n \n \nConclusion \nIn the early stage of non-operative treatment of traumatic rib fractures in adults, the multi-mode analgesic effect of traditional intravenous intermittent administration combined with subcutaneous continuous administration is superior to the single analgesic mode of traditional intravenous or subcutaneous administration with no obvious adverse reactions. \n \n \nKey words: \nMulti-mode combined analgesia; Rib fractures; Non-operative treatment; Patient-controlled subcutaneous analgesia","PeriodicalId":10181,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery","volume":"5 1","pages":"623-628"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-4497.2019.10.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the analgesic effect of a new combined analgesic mode in the early stage of non-operative treatment of adult traumatic rib fractures. Methods A total of 93 patients with rib fractures who did not receive surgical treatment from January 2014 to January 2018 were prospectively included, and randomly divided into the traditional analgesia group, subcutaneous analgesia group and combined analgesia group(31 cases each). There were 56 males and 37 females totally with a median age of(47.3±13.2)years. All patients have moderate to severe pain with VAS scores greater than 5. Traditional analgesia group: lornoxicam 8 mg intravenous injection twice daily. Subcutaneous analgesia group: only subcutaneous self-controlled analgesia pump was used for treatment. Combined analgesia group: on the basis of the traditional analgesia group, subcutaneous self-controlled analgesia pump was added for treatment, and the dosage of the pump drug was the same as that of subcutaneous analgesia group. The VAS scores at tranquillization and cough were compared before analgesia treatment(T1), 24 h(T2), 48 h(T3) and 72 h(T4) after analgesic treatment in each group during bed brake within 3 days after injury. The VAS scores after 78 hours of analgesic treatment during ambulation were compared. When sudden pain with VAS score greater than 7 occurred within 72 hours of bed staying treatment in each group, the average daily use times of bucinnazine hydrochloride 100mg remedial analgesia were compared. The number of adverse reactions such as nausea and pneumonia in each group was compared. Results The VAS scores of resting pain and cough pain at the observation time point(T2-T4) in the combined analgesia group were better than those in the subcutaneous analgesia group and the traditional analgesia group, showing a significant difference(P<0.05). When getting out of bed, there were significant differences in pain scores among the three groups, and the pain score of the combined analgesia group was the lowest. There was a significant difference among the three groups in the number of daily additions of bucinnazine hydrochloride during remedial analgesia(P<0.05), the combined analgesia group was the least. Between the two groups of patients using analgesic pump, the number of self-compressions in the combined analgesia group was lower than that in the subcutaneous analgesia group(P<0.05). The incidence of pneumonia in the combined analgesia group was lower than that in the other two groups and the incidence of other adverse reactions such as nausea was lower than that in the simple analgesia group. Conclusion In the early stage of non-operative treatment of traumatic rib fractures in adults, the multi-mode analgesic effect of traditional intravenous intermittent administration combined with subcutaneous continuous administration is superior to the single analgesic mode of traditional intravenous or subcutaneous administration with no obvious adverse reactions. Key words: Multi-mode combined analgesia; Rib fractures; Non-operative treatment; Patient-controlled subcutaneous analgesia
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多模式联合镇痛在成人外伤性肋骨骨折非手术治疗早期的应用
目的探讨一种新的联合镇痛模式在成人外伤性肋骨骨折非手术治疗早期的镇痛效果。方法前瞻性纳入2014年1月至2018年1月未接受手术治疗的肋骨骨折患者93例,随机分为传统镇痛组、皮下镇痛组和联合镇痛组各31例。男性56例,女性37例,中位年龄(47.3±13.2)岁。所有患者均有中度至重度疼痛,VAS评分大于5分。传统镇痛组:氯诺昔康8 mg静脉注射,每日2次。皮下镇痛组:仅采用皮下自控镇痛泵治疗。联合镇痛组:在传统镇痛组的基础上,加用皮下自控镇痛泵治疗,泵用药剂量与皮下镇痛组相同。比较各组伤后3 d内卧床制动时镇静和咳嗽VAS评分,分别为镇痛前(T1)、镇痛后24 h(T2)、48 h(T3)和72 h(T4)。比较两组在行走过程中镇痛治疗78 h后的VAS评分。当两组患者在卧床治疗72小时内出现突发性疼痛且VAS评分大于7分时,比较盐酸布嗪100mg的平均每日镇痛使用次数。比较两组患者恶心、肺炎等不良反应发生次数。结果联合镇痛组静息痛、咳嗽痛观察时间点(t2 ~ t4) VAS评分优于皮下镇痛组和传统镇痛组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。下床时,三组患者疼痛评分差异有统计学意义,其中联合镇痛组疼痛评分最低。三组患者补救镇痛时每日添加盐酸布嗪的次数比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),以联合镇痛组最少。两组使用镇痛泵的患者中,联合镇痛组的自我按压次数低于皮下镇痛组(P<0.05)。联合镇痛组肺炎发生率低于其他两组,恶心等其他不良反应发生率低于单纯镇痛组。结论在成人外伤性肋骨骨折非手术治疗早期,传统静脉间断给药联合皮下连续给药的多模式镇痛效果优于传统静脉或皮下单一给药方式,且无明显不良反应。关键词:多模式联合镇痛;肋骨骨折;非手术治疗;患者控制的皮下镇痛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategies for emergency cardiovascular surgery under the epidemic of COVID-19 Single stage trans-apical TAVR and trans-femoral TEVAR for severe AR concomitant with Stanford type B aortic dissection Cardiac function support after ALCAPA operation and its early outcome Lung protection of remote limb ischemic preconditioning after pulmonary resection Perioperative study of blood flow of in-situ BIMA in coronary artery bypass grafting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1