Real-Time Comparison of Electromechanical and Thyristor-Switched Capacitor Banks for Improving Power Factor in Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Industry

M. Nizam, F. Wicaksono
{"title":"Real-Time Comparison of Electromechanical and Thyristor-Switched Capacitor Banks for Improving Power Factor in Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Industry","authors":"M. Nizam, F. Wicaksono","doi":"10.1109/ICEVT.2018.8628357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the comparison of two types of capacitor banks in the market, such as Electromechanical-Switched Capacitor Banks (EMCB) and Thyristor-Switched Capacitor Banks (TSCB). Comparison is discussed through three points of view, namely the point of view in changing the voltage profile, increasing or improving the power factor, and the savings shown in the value of Rp per compensated kVAR. TSCB excels in maintaining the PF value with the lowest value at 0.93 and the highest value at 0.99. Whereas EMCB is slightly better in compensating the value of the system's reactive power of 303.22 kVAR annually, or it can be calculated to be able to do economical savings of Rp. 18,443,220.56 annually. As conclusion, TSCB is better to compensate reactive power rather than EMCB","PeriodicalId":6659,"journal":{"name":"2018 5th International Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology (ICEVT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"103-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 5th International Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology (ICEVT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEVT.2018.8628357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper discusses the comparison of two types of capacitor banks in the market, such as Electromechanical-Switched Capacitor Banks (EMCB) and Thyristor-Switched Capacitor Banks (TSCB). Comparison is discussed through three points of view, namely the point of view in changing the voltage profile, increasing or improving the power factor, and the savings shown in the value of Rp per compensated kVAR. TSCB excels in maintaining the PF value with the lowest value at 0.93 and the highest value at 0.99. Whereas EMCB is slightly better in compensating the value of the system's reactive power of 303.22 kVAR annually, or it can be calculated to be able to do economical savings of Rp. 18,443,220.56 annually. As conclusion, TSCB is better to compensate reactive power rather than EMCB
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高铅酸蓄电池制造行业功率因数的机电与晶闸管开关电容器组的实时比较
本文讨论了市场上两种类型的电容器组,即机电开关电容器组(EMCB)和晶闸管开关电容器组(TSCB)的比较。通过三个角度进行比较,即改变电压分布的角度,增加或改善功率因数的角度,以及每补偿kVAR的Rp值所显示的节省。TSCB在维持PF值方面表现较好,最低为0.93,最高为0.99。而EMCB在补偿系统每年303.22 kVAR的无功功率值方面稍好,或者可以计算出每年可以节省18,443,220.56卢比。综上所述,TSCB补偿无功功率优于EMCB
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Goal Programming Model for Capital Budgeting Investment of Lithium Accumulator Production Unit for Motorcycle Fabrication and Electrochemical Performance of LiFePO4/C as Cathode Material for Lithium Ion Battery Optimal Control for Self-Steering of a Truck System A Review of Electric Vehicles Charging Standard Development: Study Case in Indonesia Copyright
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1