Study on the Filling Differences in Cigarettes/Untersuchung über den fühlbaren Härteunterschied bei Cigaretten

H. Böttcher
{"title":"Study on the Filling Differences in Cigarettes/Untersuchung über den fühlbaren Härteunterschied bei Cigaretten","authors":"H. Böttcher","doi":"10.2478/cttr-2013-0245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In several lots of cigarette samples the differences in hardness or filling of which had objectively been defined were estimated by a group of experts. The judgement was formed per pair of samples by the criteria ''harder\" or ''softer\". The part of correct answers was brought into a relation with the hardness or filling difference objectively determined. With the use of a logarithmic scale as basis for the hardness or filling difference, this relation was shown to be linear, which made it possible, based on all results of the experiment, to determine the threshold values of hardness for the capacity of differentiating sensorially. The authors are of the opinion that the described procedure is therefore capable of providing optimum results also in the case of similar problems, if the relation between sensorial judgements and objective measuring values is to be demonstrated","PeriodicalId":35431,"journal":{"name":"Beitrage zur Tabakforschung International/ Contributions to Tobacco Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beitrage zur Tabakforschung International/ Contributions to Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2013-0245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In several lots of cigarette samples the differences in hardness or filling of which had objectively been defined were estimated by a group of experts. The judgement was formed per pair of samples by the criteria ''harder" or ''softer". The part of correct answers was brought into a relation with the hardness or filling difference objectively determined. With the use of a logarithmic scale as basis for the hardness or filling difference, this relation was shown to be linear, which made it possible, based on all results of the experiment, to determine the threshold values of hardness for the capacity of differentiating sensorially. The authors are of the opinion that the described procedure is therefore capable of providing optimum results also in the case of similar problems, if the relation between sensorial judgements and objective measuring values is to be demonstrated
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在西加勒特斯(cigarters)研究西加勒产生的巨大痛苦差异
摘要对客观确定的几批卷烟样品的硬度或填充度差异进行了专家评定。每对样品的评判标准是“硬”或“软”。将正确答案部分与客观确定的硬度或填充差关系起来。使用对数刻度作为硬度或填充差异的基础,这种关系被证明是线性的,这使得根据实验的所有结果,确定硬度的阈值来区分感官能力成为可能。作者认为,如果要证明感官判断和客观测量值之间的关系,所述程序因此也能够在类似问题的情况下提供最佳结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Beitrage zur Tabakforschung International/ Contributions to Tobacco Research
Beitrage zur Tabakforschung International/ Contributions to Tobacco Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gas Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Selective Detection of 2-Nitropropane in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke. LC-MS/MS Analysis of Sugars, Alditols, and Humectants in Smokeless Tobacco Products. Within-Laboratory Variance Outlier Detection: An Alternative to Cochran’s Test Estimation of the Retention of Menthol in the Respiratory Tract of Menthol Cigarette Smokers: A Pilot Study The Full Bibliography of Alan Rodgman
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1