The Parthenon Marbles Revisited: A New Strategy for Greece

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law Pub Date : 2015-08-13 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2188820
Nadia Banteka
{"title":"The Parthenon Marbles Revisited: A New Strategy for Greece","authors":"Nadia Banteka","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2188820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cultural property disputes raise questions of ownership, possession, alleged destruction, and looting, and are confounded by legal vacuums, and idiosyncratic statutes of limitations. Should objects of cultural heritage of a specific nation that have been removed in the past be returned to their source nation? This article addresses the perennial such claim, the claim Greece addressed to the British Museum for the return of a collection of Marbles from the Parthenon and the Acropolis of Athens. This article identifies a trajectory towards a more effective outlook on cultural property disputes transcending the traditional ownership versus value debate reflected in the recent scholarship. I argue for a shift in the context of the discussion from one of legal title and ownership to one of negotiation, cooperation, and advancement of both nationalist and internationalist ideals. It adds a new and neglected approach to an old unresolved debate by suggesting two primary arguments: (1) an inalienability argument based on Margaret Radin’s theory of personhood; and, in the alternative, (2) a reassessment of the cultural nationalism/internationalism debate through a more modest integrated approach, and new negotiation strategy based on prior successful returns of cultural property objects. First, Margaret Radin’s theory of personhood gives the country of origin a normative argument based on the link between some forms of cultural property and personhood, against typical commensurate perceptions of property. Second, and in the alternative, when the notions of cultural nationalism and internationalism are not approached as mutually exclusive the two can flourish together under clarified objectives that do not mesh with each other's agendas but rather bolster one another. This article then examines successful return strategies under this new integrated cultural nationalism/internationalism approach using the Four Quadrant Negotiation Model. Ideas such as loan agreements, trading and exchange of cultural artifacts, touring collections, exclusive excavation agreements, joint trusteeship, fractional ownership, personnel education, and liability waivers all provide excellent starting points in a negotiation not on how Greece can get the Parthenon Marbles back but on how to form a partnership between Greece and the British Museum that will promote collaboration, international exchange of cultural heritage, as well as public access, and education.","PeriodicalId":43790,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"1231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2188820","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cultural property disputes raise questions of ownership, possession, alleged destruction, and looting, and are confounded by legal vacuums, and idiosyncratic statutes of limitations. Should objects of cultural heritage of a specific nation that have been removed in the past be returned to their source nation? This article addresses the perennial such claim, the claim Greece addressed to the British Museum for the return of a collection of Marbles from the Parthenon and the Acropolis of Athens. This article identifies a trajectory towards a more effective outlook on cultural property disputes transcending the traditional ownership versus value debate reflected in the recent scholarship. I argue for a shift in the context of the discussion from one of legal title and ownership to one of negotiation, cooperation, and advancement of both nationalist and internationalist ideals. It adds a new and neglected approach to an old unresolved debate by suggesting two primary arguments: (1) an inalienability argument based on Margaret Radin’s theory of personhood; and, in the alternative, (2) a reassessment of the cultural nationalism/internationalism debate through a more modest integrated approach, and new negotiation strategy based on prior successful returns of cultural property objects. First, Margaret Radin’s theory of personhood gives the country of origin a normative argument based on the link between some forms of cultural property and personhood, against typical commensurate perceptions of property. Second, and in the alternative, when the notions of cultural nationalism and internationalism are not approached as mutually exclusive the two can flourish together under clarified objectives that do not mesh with each other's agendas but rather bolster one another. This article then examines successful return strategies under this new integrated cultural nationalism/internationalism approach using the Four Quadrant Negotiation Model. Ideas such as loan agreements, trading and exchange of cultural artifacts, touring collections, exclusive excavation agreements, joint trusteeship, fractional ownership, personnel education, and liability waivers all provide excellent starting points in a negotiation not on how Greece can get the Parthenon Marbles back but on how to form a partnership between Greece and the British Museum that will promote collaboration, international exchange of cultural heritage, as well as public access, and education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新参观帕台农神庙:希腊的新战略
文化财产纠纷引发了所有权、占有、所谓的破坏和掠夺等问题,并因法律空白和特殊的诉讼时效而感到困惑。过去被移走的特定民族的文化遗产是否应该归还给其原籍国?这篇文章讨论了希腊向大英博物馆提出的归还帕台农神庙和雅典卫城的大理石收藏品的要求。本文确定了一条更有效地看待文化财产纠纷的轨迹,超越了最近学术界反映的传统所有权与价值之争。我主张将讨论的背景从法律上的所有权和所有权转变为民族主义和国际主义理想的谈判、合作和进步。它通过提出两个主要论点,为一个未解决的旧争论增加了一个新的和被忽视的方法:(1)基于玛格丽特·雷丁的人格理论的不可剥夺性论点;并且,作为替代方案,(2)通过更温和的综合方法重新评估文化民族主义/国际主义辩论,以及基于先前成功归还文化财产对象的新谈判策略。首先,玛格丽特·雷丁(Margaret Radin)的人格理论为原产国提供了一种基于某些形式的文化财产与人格之间联系的规范性论证,而不是典型的财产相称观念。其次,在另一种情况下,当文化民族主义和国际主义的概念不被视为相互排斥时,两者可以在明确的目标下共同繁荣,这些目标不与彼此的议程相吻合,而是相互促进。然后,本文使用四象限谈判模型考察了这种新的综合文化民族主义/国际主义方法下的成功回报策略。诸如贷款协议、文物交易和交换、巡回收藏、独家挖掘协议、共同托管、部分所有权、人员教育和责任豁免等想法,都为谈判提供了很好的起点,这些谈判不是关于希腊如何夺回帕台农神庙大理石,而是关于如何在希腊和大英博物馆之间建立伙伴关系,促进合作、文化遗产的国际交流,以及公众访问。和教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The New Geographies of Corporate Law Production Post-Conflict Pluralism Genocide and Belonging: Processes of Imagining Communities The "Memory Effect The Parthenon Marbles Revisited: A New Strategy for Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1