Strategies of adults for dealing with feelings of guilt - findings from a large web-based survey.

IF 0.8 Q4 Medicine JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION Pub Date : 2022-07-08 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5114/hpr/150501
Tobias Luck, Claudia Luck-Sikorski
{"title":"Strategies of adults for dealing with feelings of guilt - findings from a large web-based survey.","authors":"Tobias Luck, Claudia Luck-Sikorski","doi":"10.5114/hpr/150501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feelings of guilt are common in adulthood. Depending on the situation, individuals need different strategies for dealing with these usually unpleasant experiences. The aim of this study was to provide comprehensive empirical information about such different guilt-related strategies used in adulthood.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted (05/2019-04/2020) collecting autobiographical information on guilt experiences. Stated strategies for dealing with feelings of guilt were classified into inductively defined categories, and the frequency of the categorized strategies was calculated (total, gender-, age-specific). Associations between applied strategies and gender and age were analyzed using Cramér's φ and V as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyzing statements of 579 participants (18-84 years), we differentiated 34 different categories of guilt-related strategies. The most frequently used strategies were \"Self-reflection; contemplation; analyzing/reviewing things one feels guilty about\" and \"Repressing/ignoring/(actively) forgetting/not thinking about/bottling up the feelings of guilt\". Female and male participants showed a significantly different use only in the strategy of utilizing \"Professional support/therapy/counseling\" (10.57% vs. 3.67%; Cramér's φ = .13, <i>p</i> = .001). Additionally, only a few differences were found with regard to age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults use a broad variety of different strategies for dealing with feelings of guilt. Strategies regulating emotional responses to the problem causing feelings of guilt seem to be at least as important as strategies targeting the problem itself. Many strategies do not serve pro-social functions. Feelings of guilt are an issue relevant for mental health care since several of the adults with feelings of guilt utilize professional help, and an even higher number may need such help.</p>","PeriodicalId":46281,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION","volume":"12 1","pages":"22-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/150501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Feelings of guilt are common in adulthood. Depending on the situation, individuals need different strategies for dealing with these usually unpleasant experiences. The aim of this study was to provide comprehensive empirical information about such different guilt-related strategies used in adulthood.

Participants and procedure: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted (05/2019-04/2020) collecting autobiographical information on guilt experiences. Stated strategies for dealing with feelings of guilt were classified into inductively defined categories, and the frequency of the categorized strategies was calculated (total, gender-, age-specific). Associations between applied strategies and gender and age were analyzed using Cramér's φ and V as appropriate.

Results: Analyzing statements of 579 participants (18-84 years), we differentiated 34 different categories of guilt-related strategies. The most frequently used strategies were "Self-reflection; contemplation; analyzing/reviewing things one feels guilty about" and "Repressing/ignoring/(actively) forgetting/not thinking about/bottling up the feelings of guilt". Female and male participants showed a significantly different use only in the strategy of utilizing "Professional support/therapy/counseling" (10.57% vs. 3.67%; Cramér's φ = .13, p = .001). Additionally, only a few differences were found with regard to age.

Conclusions: Adults use a broad variety of different strategies for dealing with feelings of guilt. Strategies regulating emotional responses to the problem causing feelings of guilt seem to be at least as important as strategies targeting the problem itself. Many strategies do not serve pro-social functions. Feelings of guilt are an issue relevant for mental health care since several of the adults with feelings of guilt utilize professional help, and an even higher number may need such help.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成年人处理内疚感的策略--一项大型网络调查的结果。
背景:内疚感在成年后很常见。根据不同的情况,个人需要不同的策略来处理这些通常令人不快的经历。本研究旨在提供有关成年期内疚感相关策略的全面实证信息:我们进行了一项横断面网络调查(2019 年 5 月至 2020 年 4 月),收集有关内疚经历的自传信息。通过归纳定义,将所陈述的处理内疚感的策略进行分类,并计算分类策略的频率(总频率、性别频率、年龄频率)。根据情况使用 Cramér's φ 和 V 分析了应用策略与性别和年龄之间的关联:通过分析 579 名参与者(18-84 岁)的陈述,我们区分出 34 种不同的内疚策略。最常用的策略是 "自我反省;沉思;分析/回顾自己感到内疚的事情 "和 "压抑/忽视/(主动)遗忘/不思考/压抑内疚感"。男女参与者仅在 "专业支持/治疗/咨询 "策略的使用上存在明显差异(10.57% vs. 3.67%;Cramér's φ = .13,p = .001)。此外,仅在年龄方面发现了一些差异:结论:成人使用多种不同的策略来处理内疚感。调节对导致内疚感的问题的情绪反应的策略似乎至少与针对问题本身的策略同样重要。许多策略并不具有亲社会的功能。内疚感是一个与心理保健相关的问题,因为有内疚感的成年人中有一些人利用了专业帮助,甚至有更多的人可能需要这种帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION
JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Authoritative, peer-refereed publication affording a wide-ranging coverage of important trends and developments in the drug field. Whatever your area of special interest, the Journal of Drug Education brings timely, helpful information, insights and methodologies that can be adapted to various situations. Look to this Quarterly for critical analyses, innovative approaches, scholarly standards, and clear, concise reports on theoretical, research and programmatic issues.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Sectional Associations Between Expectancies for Cannabis use and Pain in an Emerging Adult Sample. Project SUCCESS: Youth Substance use and Mental Health. Effects of a Brief Safe Drinking Intervention on Depressive and Anxiety Symptomatology: Examining Potential Side Effects of Deviance Regulation Theory Interventions. The Role of Alcohol Expectancies in the Association Between Behavioral Economic Alcohol Demand, Relative Reinforcement, and Alcohol Problems. Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategy use and Negative Consequences Across Heavy Alcohol Users and Risky Drinkers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1