Efficacy Of High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation In Acute Respiratory Failure Patients And Comparing With Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation

A. Mohamed, Ahmed Yasin Mohamed
{"title":"Efficacy Of High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation In Acute Respiratory Failure Patients And Comparing With Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation","authors":"A. Mohamed, Ahmed Yasin Mohamed","doi":"10.21608/ejmr.2022.266288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The goal of this study is to assess HFNC oxygenation and compare the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) on oxygenation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The patients were randomly grouped into two groups, 20 in each group. Group 1: treated by high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and group 2: treated by non-invasive ventilation. There was a statistically significant difference regarding P a O 2 /FiO 2 at baseline and at the end ( P-value < 0.001) in both groups indicating improvement of oxygenation in both groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the P a O 2 and P a O 2 /FiO 2 ratio (P-value < 0.05) at the end of the trial however the degree of oxygenation improvement was significantly higher with NIV group. The conclusion of our study: the use of high flow nasal cannula is effective in improving oxygenation but NIV was superior to HFNC.","PeriodicalId":11524,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmr.2022.266288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: The goal of this study is to assess HFNC oxygenation and compare the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) on oxygenation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The patients were randomly grouped into two groups, 20 in each group. Group 1: treated by high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and group 2: treated by non-invasive ventilation. There was a statistically significant difference regarding P a O 2 /FiO 2 at baseline and at the end ( P-value < 0.001) in both groups indicating improvement of oxygenation in both groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the P a O 2 and P a O 2 /FiO 2 ratio (P-value < 0.05) at the end of the trial however the degree of oxygenation improvement was significantly higher with NIV group. The conclusion of our study: the use of high flow nasal cannula is effective in improving oxygenation but NIV was superior to HFNC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高流量鼻插管氧合治疗急性呼吸衰竭的疗效及与无创正压通气的比较
本研究的目的是评估高流量鼻插管(HFNC)与无创通气(NIV)对急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者氧合效果的影响。随机分为两组,每组20例。1组采用高流量鼻插管治疗,2组采用无创通气治疗。两组在基线时和结束时的po2 / fio2差异有统计学意义(P值< 0.001),表明两组的氧合改善。两组在试验结束时的心肺氧合及心肺氧合/心肺氧合比值差异有统计学意义(P值< 0.05),但NIV组的氧合改善程度明显高于对照组。本研究结论:大流量鼻插管改善氧合效果明显,但NIV优于HFNC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
association of dyslipidemia to asymptomatic sensorineural hearing loss in Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus Rate, Precautions, and Outcome of Vaginal Birth after Caesarean Section in Beni-Suef Governorate The Potential Ameliorative Effect of Empagliflozin on Myocardium in Cardiorenal Syndrome 3 via Targeting Mitophagy and Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Adult Male Albino Rat Model: Biochemical, Histological and Immunohistochemical Study Regulatory T cells and Disease damage in systemic lupus erythematosus Effect of intraoperative Magnesium sulphate on Electro-Encephalogram in patients undergoing lumbar fixation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1