Genomic Research in Indian Country: The New Road to Termination?

M. Sanders
{"title":"Genomic Research in Indian Country: The New Road to Termination?","authors":"M. Sanders","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2318615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genomic science has generated controversy in the social, legal, and ethical arenas for decades, and indigenous populations continue to be a subject of great interest in this area. This article looks at the recent concept of population genomics, a biotechnology used to help scientists understand how genetic variation relates to human health and evolutionary history. Parts II and III examine the debate among scientists as to the migration of the “first Americans” into North America, a debate that is quickly being influenced by the DNA markers found in the human genome. Part IV surveys the history of scientific research involving indigenous peoples – a history predominantly colored by ignorance and bias – as science was presented as conclusive proof of their savage nature and inferiority as a race. Scientists today proffer evidence that the ancestors of Native Americans were, in reality, colonists who immigrated from Africa, Europe, and/or Asia, and Part V analyzes a number of indicators that point to the possibility of genomic research providing justification for another termination of the special status and rights of Native Americans. Part VI looks at a number of tools that tribes may wish to consider using to help protect the genetic information of their members as they are faced with the seemingly endless need of researchers for Native American DNA. The article concludes that while suppositions of geneticists are in actuality just theories of historic migration, these theories have gained acceptance as fact in mainstream society. Given current indicators, Congress and/or the courts may very well use genomic science to justify another termination of the federal/tribal trust relationship.","PeriodicalId":82220,"journal":{"name":"Oklahoma City University law review. Oklahoma City University","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oklahoma City University law review. Oklahoma City University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2318615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genomic science has generated controversy in the social, legal, and ethical arenas for decades, and indigenous populations continue to be a subject of great interest in this area. This article looks at the recent concept of population genomics, a biotechnology used to help scientists understand how genetic variation relates to human health and evolutionary history. Parts II and III examine the debate among scientists as to the migration of the “first Americans” into North America, a debate that is quickly being influenced by the DNA markers found in the human genome. Part IV surveys the history of scientific research involving indigenous peoples – a history predominantly colored by ignorance and bias – as science was presented as conclusive proof of their savage nature and inferiority as a race. Scientists today proffer evidence that the ancestors of Native Americans were, in reality, colonists who immigrated from Africa, Europe, and/or Asia, and Part V analyzes a number of indicators that point to the possibility of genomic research providing justification for another termination of the special status and rights of Native Americans. Part VI looks at a number of tools that tribes may wish to consider using to help protect the genetic information of their members as they are faced with the seemingly endless need of researchers for Native American DNA. The article concludes that while suppositions of geneticists are in actuality just theories of historic migration, these theories have gained acceptance as fact in mainstream society. Given current indicators, Congress and/or the courts may very well use genomic science to justify another termination of the federal/tribal trust relationship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度国家的基因组研究:通往终结的新道路?
几十年来,基因组科学在社会、法律和伦理领域产生了争议,土著人口仍然是这一领域的一个非常感兴趣的主题。这篇文章着眼于人口基因组学的最新概念,这是一种生物技术,用于帮助科学家了解遗传变异与人类健康和进化历史的关系。第二部分和第三部分考察了科学家之间关于“第一批美洲人”迁移到北美的争论,这一争论很快受到人类基因组中发现的DNA标记的影响。第四部分调查了涉及土著人民的科学研究历史- -这是一段主要被无知和偏见所影响的历史- -因为科学被认为是土著人民野蛮本性和作为一个种族劣等的确凿证据。今天的科学家提供了证据,证明印第安人的祖先实际上是从非洲、欧洲和/或亚洲移民过来的殖民者。第五部分分析了一些指标,这些指标表明,基因组研究可能为再次终止印第安人的特殊地位和权利提供理由。第六部分着眼于部落可能希望考虑使用的一些工具,以帮助保护其成员的遗传信息,因为他们面临着研究人员对美洲原住民DNA的看似无休止的需求。文章的结论是,虽然遗传学家的假设实际上只是历史移民的理论,但这些理论已经被主流社会接受为事实。鉴于目前的指标,国会和/或法院可能会很好地利用基因组科学来证明再次终止联邦/部落信任关系的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genomic Research in Indian Country: The New Road to Termination? The Chains of the Constitution and Legal Process in the Library: a Post-Patriot Reauthorization Act Assessment Medical gender bias and managed care. Legal issues in end-of-life care in Oklahoma. DNA analysis and the Freedom of Information Act: information or invasion?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1