Elizabeth Boyd's Disappearing Act: Performing Literary Legacy on the Georgian Stage

Kristina Straub
{"title":"Elizabeth Boyd's Disappearing Act: Performing Literary Legacy on the Georgian Stage","authors":"Kristina Straub","doi":"10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do we trace the historical processes that grant some writers visibility and, hence, legacy, while shoving others into the historical closet? This essay offers the case study of Elizabeth Boyd (1727-1745), a novelist, poet, and playwright who has received some attention from scholars interested in women’s contributions to the legacy of William Shakespeare in the second quarter of the eighteenth century. In particular, her unperformed play, Don Sancho: Or, the Students Whim, a Ballad Opera of Two Acts, with Minerva’s Triumph, a Masque (1739) dramatizes a woman writer’s reflections on the politics of legacy at this formative moment in the history of authorship and the British theater. While the play was not performed, key scenes were later plagiarized in popular afterpieces by theater managers and playwrights Henry Giffard and David Garrick. Boyd, along with her inclusive vision of theatrical legacy as the domain of men and women of different classes, disappears in the male playwrights’ fantasies of exclusively masculine, British literary greatness. The story of Boyd’s erasure speaks to the gendered and classed exclusions and elisions in the social and economic processes by which legacy is formed, in this case, in the gendered power relations of eighteenth-century theater and its management.","PeriodicalId":30251,"journal":{"name":"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do we trace the historical processes that grant some writers visibility and, hence, legacy, while shoving others into the historical closet? This essay offers the case study of Elizabeth Boyd (1727-1745), a novelist, poet, and playwright who has received some attention from scholars interested in women’s contributions to the legacy of William Shakespeare in the second quarter of the eighteenth century. In particular, her unperformed play, Don Sancho: Or, the Students Whim, a Ballad Opera of Two Acts, with Minerva’s Triumph, a Masque (1739) dramatizes a woman writer’s reflections on the politics of legacy at this formative moment in the history of authorship and the British theater. While the play was not performed, key scenes were later plagiarized in popular afterpieces by theater managers and playwrights Henry Giffard and David Garrick. Boyd, along with her inclusive vision of theatrical legacy as the domain of men and women of different classes, disappears in the male playwrights’ fantasies of exclusively masculine, British literary greatness. The story of Boyd’s erasure speaks to the gendered and classed exclusions and elisions in the social and economic processes by which legacy is formed, in this case, in the gendered power relations of eighteenth-century theater and its management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊丽莎白·博伊德的消失行为:格鲁吉亚舞台上的表演文学遗产
我们如何追溯赋予一些作家知名度和遗产的历史进程,同时将其他作家推入历史的壁橱?本文以伊丽莎白·博伊德(Elizabeth Boyd, 1727-1745)为例,她是一位小说家、诗人和剧作家,受到了一些学者的关注,这些学者对18世纪下半叶威廉·莎士比亚遗产中女性的贡献感兴趣。特别是,她未演出的戏剧《唐·桑丘:或者,学生的奇想》,一部两幕的叙事剧,与密涅瓦的《胜利,假面》(1739)一起,戏剧化了一位女作家对作家和英国戏剧史上这一形成时刻的政治遗产的反思。虽然这部剧没有被演出,但后来剧院经理和剧作家亨利·吉福德和大卫·加里克在流行的后记中抄袭了关键的场景。博伊德,连同她对戏剧遗产作为不同阶级的男人和女人的领域的包容性愿景,消失在男性剧作家对完全男性化的英国文学伟大的幻想中。博伊德被抹去的故事讲述了社会和经济过程中性别和阶级的排斥和省略,在这种情况下,遗产是在十八世纪戏剧及其管理的性别权力关系中形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Before I am Quite Forgot": Women’s Critical Literary Biography and the Future Mary Prince’s Undisciplining Lessons: Counter-Narrative and Testimonio in The History Plotting the Plantationocene with The History of Mary Prince Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy Review of Figurations of the Feminine, by Siobhán McIlvanney
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1