{"title":"Monograph by Ina Pukelytė Žydų Teatras Tarpukario Lietuvoje (Jewish Theatre in Lithuania During the Interwar Period)","authors":"Martynas Petrikas","doi":"10.2478/mik-2018-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are (at least) two approaches that guide every historiographical endeavour. One type of historian is metaphorically led by Leopold von Ranke and his call for representation of historical events “as they truly were”, i.e., representation must be backed by all possible empirical, material, and documental evidence. Another type of historical thinking produces historiographical works that are usually referred to as post-positivist or rhetorical. In this case, discursive strategies—i.e., methodological and theoretical ways, means, and frameworks of representation of past realities—are emphasized. The bifurcation of these approaches becomes especially evident in the multiplicity of historiographies of late 20th century, when historiographical research begins to incorporate cultural and linguistic studies, feminist, and post-colonial studies in all their shapes and directions. As a guiding principle, these historiographies often pursuit to voice silenced histories of agents traditionally not included in mainstream cultural memory and its metaphorical archive.","PeriodicalId":36225,"journal":{"name":"Art History and Criticism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art History and Criticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mik-2018-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There are (at least) two approaches that guide every historiographical endeavour. One type of historian is metaphorically led by Leopold von Ranke and his call for representation of historical events “as they truly were”, i.e., representation must be backed by all possible empirical, material, and documental evidence. Another type of historical thinking produces historiographical works that are usually referred to as post-positivist or rhetorical. In this case, discursive strategies—i.e., methodological and theoretical ways, means, and frameworks of representation of past realities—are emphasized. The bifurcation of these approaches becomes especially evident in the multiplicity of historiographies of late 20th century, when historiographical research begins to incorporate cultural and linguistic studies, feminist, and post-colonial studies in all their shapes and directions. As a guiding principle, these historiographies often pursuit to voice silenced histories of agents traditionally not included in mainstream cultural memory and its metaphorical archive.
伊娜·普克里特耶专著Žydų Teatras Tarpukario Lietuvoje(两次世界大战期间立陶宛的犹太剧院)
(至少)有两种方法指导每一项历史编纂工作。以利奥波德·冯·兰克(Leopold von Ranke)为代表的一类历史学家,他呼吁“真实地”再现历史事件,也就是说,再现必须得到所有可能的经验、材料和文献证据的支持。另一种类型的历史思维产生的史学作品通常被称为后实证主义或修辞。在这种情况下,话语策略——即:,方法和理论的方式,手段,和框架的代表性过去的现实-强调。这些方法的分歧在20世纪后期的史学研究的多样性中变得尤为明显,当时史学研究开始以各种形式和方向纳入文化和语言研究、女权主义和后殖民研究。作为一项指导原则,这些历史编纂者往往追求为传统上不包括在主流文化记忆及其隐喻档案中的代理人的沉默历史发声。