Is Neuraxial Clonidine a Safer Alternative to Opioids for Chronic Pain? An Alternative Worth Exploring

N. Mekhail, Shrif J Costandi, A. Abd-Elsayed, G. Fiore, Jijun Xu, Lou-Anne Acevedo-Moreno, L. Kapural, A. Rezai, C. Gilligan
{"title":"Is Neuraxial Clonidine a Safer Alternative to Opioids for Chronic Pain? An Alternative Worth Exploring","authors":"N. Mekhail, Shrif J Costandi, A. Abd-Elsayed, G. Fiore, Jijun Xu, Lou-Anne Acevedo-Moreno, L. Kapural, A. Rezai, C. Gilligan","doi":"10.31487/j.nnb.2020.03.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Exploring the potential role of clonidine as an alternative to the currently available neuraxial\nmedication options for the management of chronic pain.\nMethods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted investigating the treatment of chronic pain\nusing clonidine over the past 73 years. A stepwise filtering approach was used to obtain articles addressing\nneuraxial treatment of chronic pain in adults. Selected articles were assessed for their levels of evidence\nfollowed by a discussion of their contribution to the understanding of the role of clonidine in chronic pain\nmanagement.\nResults: Out of 1,035 articles that described the administration of clonidine for chronic pain management,\nseven articles met all of the inclusion criteria. Their levels of evidence ranged from 1a to 4 (Oxford Centre\nCEBM). Neuraxial administration of clonidine was found to be effective in the treatment of chronic pain,\noften exhibiting a synergistic effect with other analgesics to provide pain reduction with reduced opioid use.\nThe most common side effect was hypotension, in some cases reported to have been serious.\nConclusion: The use of neuraxial clonidine, in either a primary or adjunctive role, appears promising as an\neffective treatment for chronic pain.","PeriodicalId":19179,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Neurobiology","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.nnb.2020.03.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Exploring the potential role of clonidine as an alternative to the currently available neuraxial medication options for the management of chronic pain. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted investigating the treatment of chronic pain using clonidine over the past 73 years. A stepwise filtering approach was used to obtain articles addressing neuraxial treatment of chronic pain in adults. Selected articles were assessed for their levels of evidence followed by a discussion of their contribution to the understanding of the role of clonidine in chronic pain management. Results: Out of 1,035 articles that described the administration of clonidine for chronic pain management, seven articles met all of the inclusion criteria. Their levels of evidence ranged from 1a to 4 (Oxford Centre CEBM). Neuraxial administration of clonidine was found to be effective in the treatment of chronic pain, often exhibiting a synergistic effect with other analgesics to provide pain reduction with reduced opioid use. The most common side effect was hypotension, in some cases reported to have been serious. Conclusion: The use of neuraxial clonidine, in either a primary or adjunctive role, appears promising as an effective treatment for chronic pain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对于慢性疼痛,轴向可乐定是阿片类药物更安全的替代品吗?一个值得探索的选择
目的:探讨可乐定作为目前可用的神经轴向药物治疗慢性疼痛的替代方案的潜在作用。方法:对我院近73年来使用可乐定治疗慢性疼痛的临床资料进行回顾性分析。采用逐步过滤的方法来获得有关成人慢性疼痛的轴向治疗的文章。选定的文章被评估其证据水平,然后讨论他们对可乐定在慢性疼痛管理中的作用的理解的贡献。结果:在1035篇描述使用可乐定治疗慢性疼痛的文章中,有7篇文章符合所有纳入标准。他们的证据等级从1a到4(牛津中心)。研究发现,轴向给药可乐定对慢性疼痛的治疗是有效的,通常表现出与其他镇痛药的协同作用,通过减少阿片类药物的使用来减轻疼痛。最常见的副作用是低血压,在某些情况下报道严重。结论:使用轴向可乐定,无论是在主要或辅助作用,似乎是一种有效的治疗慢性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neurosurgical Presentations of Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Our Experience in a Regional Neurosurgical Centre, Sokoto, Nigeria Cognitive Neuroscience of Conscious Dreaming: Investigating Methodological Approaches to Detect Dream Lucidity in Sleep Studies Review Article: Clinical Symptoms and Structures Involved in Isolated Infarcts in the Branches of the Anterior, Middle, and Posterior Cerebral Arteries Towards a Neural Network Hypothesis for Functional (Dissociative) Amnesia: Catastrophic Forgetting Repeat Traumatic Brain Injury Complications with Localized Dissociative Amnesia of Twenty-Two Years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1