Exploring the links between simulation modelling and construction production planning and control: a case study on the last planner system

IF 6.1 3区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Production Planning & Control Pub Date : 2021-06-10 DOI:10.1080/09537287.2021.1934588
M. A. Abdelmegid, V. González, M. O'Sullivan, C. Walker, M. Poshdar, L. Alarcón
{"title":"Exploring the links between simulation modelling and construction production planning and control: a case study on the last planner system","authors":"M. A. Abdelmegid, V. González, M. O'Sullivan, C. Walker, M. Poshdar, L. Alarcón","doi":"10.1080/09537287.2021.1934588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Simulation modelling has been utilised as a decision-support tool for different production systems. However, simulation uptake in construction is lagging due to several challenges such as the extensive data requirements and modelling efforts in a simulation study. This paper aims at addressing this gap by introducing a framework that integrates the practices of simulation modelling with the Last Planner® System (LPS), which is a well-established production planning and control method. The framework focuses on exploiting the outputs of implementing the LPS to support building a valid simulation model. A case study is conducted to test the applicability of the proposed framework. Based on the findings of the study, it can be concluded that the LPS provides a promising avenue for integration with simulation modelling due to the shared processes and requirements between both methods, which may lead to minimised data requirements and modelling efforts for simulation, thus improving simulation uptake in the construction industry.","PeriodicalId":20627,"journal":{"name":"Production Planning & Control","volume":"42 1","pages":"459 - 476"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production Planning & Control","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1934588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Simulation modelling has been utilised as a decision-support tool for different production systems. However, simulation uptake in construction is lagging due to several challenges such as the extensive data requirements and modelling efforts in a simulation study. This paper aims at addressing this gap by introducing a framework that integrates the practices of simulation modelling with the Last Planner® System (LPS), which is a well-established production planning and control method. The framework focuses on exploiting the outputs of implementing the LPS to support building a valid simulation model. A case study is conducted to test the applicability of the proposed framework. Based on the findings of the study, it can be concluded that the LPS provides a promising avenue for integration with simulation modelling due to the shared processes and requirements between both methods, which may lead to minimised data requirements and modelling efforts for simulation, thus improving simulation uptake in the construction industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索模拟建模与建筑生产计划和控制之间的联系:最后计划系统的案例研究
仿真建模已被用作不同生产系统的决策支持工具。然而,由于一些挑战,例如模拟研究中的大量数据需求和建模工作,建筑中的模拟吸收滞后。本文旨在通过引入一个框架来解决这一差距,该框架将模拟建模的实践与Last Planner®System (LPS)相结合,LPS是一种完善的生产计划和控制方法。该框架的重点是利用实现LPS的输出来支持构建有效的仿真模型。通过案例研究验证了该框架的适用性。根据研究结果,可以得出结论,由于两种方法之间共享的过程和要求,LPS提供了与仿真建模集成的有希望的途径,这可能导致最小化数据需求和建模模拟工作,从而提高建筑业的仿真吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Production Planning & Control
Production Planning & Control 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
9.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Production Planning & Control is an international journal that focuses on research papers concerning operations management across industries. It emphasizes research originating from industrial needs that can provide guidance to managers and future researchers. Papers accepted by "Production Planning & Control" should address emerging industrial needs, clearly outlining the nature of the industrial problem. Any suitable research methods may be employed, and each paper should justify the method used. Case studies illustrating international significance are encouraged. Authors are encouraged to relate their work to existing knowledge in the field, particularly regarding its implications for management practice and future research agendas.
期刊最新文献
A framework for the systematic implementation of Green-Lean and sustainability in SMEs Exploring the barriers in medical additive manufacturing from an emerging economy Engaging with ‘Engineer for Supply Chain’ (EfSC): insights from two engineer-to-order manufacturers Towards a unified theory of supply chain value creation and capture Sustainable humanitarian supply chains: a systematic literature review and research propositions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1