A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FREQUENCY OF ANTIBIOTIC USE IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS WITH COVID-19

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.25284/2519-2078.2(95).2021.238313
S. Dubrov, Y. Zaikin, S. Cherniaiev, T. Baranovska, M. Denysiuk, S. O. Sereda
{"title":"A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FREQUENCY OF ANTIBIOTIC USE IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS WITH COVID-19","authors":"S. Dubrov, Y. Zaikin, S. Cherniaiev, T. Baranovska, M. Denysiuk, S. O. Sereda","doi":"10.25284/2519-2078.2(95).2021.238313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Most hospitalized patients with COVID-19, both in medical institutions in Ukraine and in other countries, are unreasonably receiving antibacterial drugs, despite the fact that secondary bacterial infections in patients with COVID-19 are extremely rare, as evi-denced by numerous scientific studies (from 3 up to 10% among hospitalized patients).The goal of the work. Conduct a retrospective analysis of the frequency of use and justification of the prescription of antibacterial drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in two medical institutions in the city of Kyiv.Materials and methods. A retrospective study of 240 medical records of an inpatient (form 003 / y), randomly selected, hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19 from September 2020 to April 2021, who were hospitalized in two communal medical institutions in the city of Kyiv.Results and discussion. The number of patients who received antibacterial drugs in the CUE KCCH №17 (antibacterial drugs were prescribed by concilium and only if there was a reasonable suspicion or confirmation of a bacterial infection) was 20 out of 120 (16.7%), while in the compared institution the frequency of prescription of antibacterial drugs accounted for 117 patients out of 120 analyzed cases (97.5%). The average length of stay of a patient on inpatient treatment in the two compared institutions had no statistically significant differences and was 11.2 ± 6.0 days in patients with the CUE KCCH №17, and 12.3 ± 4.6 days in patients from the control institution (р>0.05). The mortality rate did not differ between patients treated in both hospitals.Conclusions. After analyzing the results of the study, it can be concluded that the routine prescription of antibacterial drugs without available indications does not have the advantage of improving the quality of treatment for patients with COVID-19, does not reduce the duration of inpatient treatment and the mortality rate, does not prevent the risk of secondary bacterial infection in hospitalized patients. however, it leads to a significant increase in the cost of treating a case of the disease and leads to an increase in the resistance of hospital microorganisms to antibacterial drugs.","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.2(95).2021.238313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Most hospitalized patients with COVID-19, both in medical institutions in Ukraine and in other countries, are unreasonably receiving antibacterial drugs, despite the fact that secondary bacterial infections in patients with COVID-19 are extremely rare, as evi-denced by numerous scientific studies (from 3 up to 10% among hospitalized patients).The goal of the work. Conduct a retrospective analysis of the frequency of use and justification of the prescription of antibacterial drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in two medical institutions in the city of Kyiv.Materials and methods. A retrospective study of 240 medical records of an inpatient (form 003 / y), randomly selected, hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19 from September 2020 to April 2021, who were hospitalized in two communal medical institutions in the city of Kyiv.Results and discussion. The number of patients who received antibacterial drugs in the CUE KCCH №17 (antibacterial drugs were prescribed by concilium and only if there was a reasonable suspicion or confirmation of a bacterial infection) was 20 out of 120 (16.7%), while in the compared institution the frequency of prescription of antibacterial drugs accounted for 117 patients out of 120 analyzed cases (97.5%). The average length of stay of a patient on inpatient treatment in the two compared institutions had no statistically significant differences and was 11.2 ± 6.0 days in patients with the CUE KCCH №17, and 12.3 ± 4.6 days in patients from the control institution (р>0.05). The mortality rate did not differ between patients treated in both hospitals.Conclusions. After analyzing the results of the study, it can be concluded that the routine prescription of antibacterial drugs without available indications does not have the advantage of improving the quality of treatment for patients with COVID-19, does not reduce the duration of inpatient treatment and the mortality rate, does not prevent the risk of secondary bacterial infection in hospitalized patients. however, it leads to a significant increase in the cost of treating a case of the disease and leads to an increase in the resistance of hospital microorganisms to antibacterial drugs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19住院患者抗生素使用频率的回顾性分析
介绍。在乌克兰和其他国家的医疗机构中,大多数COVID-19住院患者都不合理地使用抗菌药物,尽管许多科学研究证明,COVID-19患者的继发性细菌感染极为罕见(住院患者中从3%到10%)。工作的目标。对基辅市两家医疗机构COVID-19住院患者抗菌药物的使用频率和处方合理性进行回顾性分析。材料和方法。对一名随机选择的住院患者(003 / y表)的240份医疗记录进行回顾性研究,该患者于2020年9月至2021年4月期间因诊断为COVID-19而住院,并在基辅市的两个社区医疗机构住院。结果和讨论。在CUE KCCH№17中,接受抗菌药物治疗的患者人数(抗菌药物由医师开具,只有在合理怀疑或确认细菌感染时才开具)为120例中的20例(16.7%),而在比较机构中,抗菌药物的处方频率占120例分析病例中的117例(97.5%)。两家比较机构患者住院治疗的平均时间无统计学差异,CUE KCCH№17患者住院治疗的平均时间为11.2±6.0天,对照组患者住院治疗的平均时间为12.3±4.6天(p < 0.05)。两家医院治疗的患者死亡率无差异。通过对研究结果的分析,可以得出结论,无指征的常规处方抗菌药物不能提高COVID-19患者的治疗质量,不能缩短住院时间和死亡率,不能预防住院患者继发细菌感染的风险。然而,它导致治疗一个病例的成本显著增加,并导致医院微生物对抗菌药物的耐药性增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
NSAIDs in COVID-19, friend or foe? Post cervical spine surgery hyperpyrexia (108?F) in a patient with COVID-19: a case report Extreme physical exhaustion leading to hypokalemic periodic paralysis- a case report Difficult airway management in Apert syndrome for maxillofacial reconstruction: a case report Anesthesia without opioids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1