Risk and Resilience in Health Data Infrastructure

W. N. Price Ii
{"title":"Risk and Resilience in Health Data Infrastructure","authors":"W. N. Price Ii","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2928997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today’s health system runs on data. However, for a system that generates and requires so much data, the health care system is surprisingly bad at maintaining, connecting, and using those data. In the easy cases of coordinated care and stationary patients, the system works — sometimes. But when care is fragmented, fragmented data often result. Fragmented data create risks both to individual patients and to the system. For patients, fragmentation creates risks in care based on incomplete or incorrect information, and may also lead to privacy risks from a patched-together system. For the system, data fragmentation hinders efforts to improve efficiency and quality, and to drive health innovation based on collected data. Efforts to combat data fragmentation would benefit by considering the idea of health data infrastructure. Most obviously, that would be infrastructure for health data — that is, infrastructure on which health data can be stored and transmitted. But it should also be an infrastructure of health data — that is, a platform of shared data on which to base further efforts to increase the efficiency or quality of care.","PeriodicalId":83420,"journal":{"name":"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2928997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Today’s health system runs on data. However, for a system that generates and requires so much data, the health care system is surprisingly bad at maintaining, connecting, and using those data. In the easy cases of coordinated care and stationary patients, the system works — sometimes. But when care is fragmented, fragmented data often result. Fragmented data create risks both to individual patients and to the system. For patients, fragmentation creates risks in care based on incomplete or incorrect information, and may also lead to privacy risks from a patched-together system. For the system, data fragmentation hinders efforts to improve efficiency and quality, and to drive health innovation based on collected data. Efforts to combat data fragmentation would benefit by considering the idea of health data infrastructure. Most obviously, that would be infrastructure for health data — that is, infrastructure on which health data can be stored and transmitted. But it should also be an infrastructure of health data — that is, a platform of shared data on which to base further efforts to increase the efficiency or quality of care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生数据基础设施中的风险和弹性
今天的卫生系统依靠数据运转。然而,对于一个生成和需要如此多数据的系统来说,医疗保健系统在维护、连接和使用这些数据方面出奇地糟糕。在协调护理和固定病人的简单案例中,该系统有时会起作用。但如果护理是碎片化的,往往会导致数据碎片化。碎片化的数据给个体患者和系统都带来了风险。对于患者来说,碎片化会造成基于不完整或不正确信息的护理风险,还可能导致拼凑在一起的系统带来隐私风险。对于该系统而言,数据碎片化阻碍了提高效率和质量的努力,也阻碍了基于收集到的数据推动卫生创新。考虑卫生数据基础设施的概念将有利于打击数据碎片化的努力。最明显的是,这将是卫生数据的基础设施,即可以存储和传输卫生数据的基础设施。但它也应该是卫生数据的基础设施,即一个共享数据的平台,以此为基础进一步努力提高医疗效率或质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A System Out of Balance: A Critical Analysis of Philosophical Justifications for Copyright Law Through the Lenz of Users' Rights Giving the Fourth Amendment Meaning: Creating an Adversarial Warrant Proceeding to Protect From Unreasonable Searches and Seizures Private Caregiver Presumption For Elder Caregivers The Short Unhappy Life of the Negotiation Class Former Whistleblowers: Why the False Claims Act's Anti-Retaliation Provision Should Protect Former Employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1