Managing Group Dynamics and Effectiveness of University Staff: Evidence from Nigeria

E. Edward, Nkiruka Amaluwa
{"title":"Managing Group Dynamics and Effectiveness of University Staff: Evidence from Nigeria","authors":"E. Edward, Nkiruka Amaluwa","doi":"10.33844/ijol.2022.60625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research evidence linking managing group dynamic (GPD) to the effectiveness of academic and non-academic staff of Nigerian universities, is ostensibly scarce. While existing studies have majorly addressed the performance impact of group dynamics in general perspectives, there is a gap in gauging how managing dynamics in groups could lead to the effectiveness of staff of Nigerian universities. Built on two complementary theories, the study has sought to investigate the relationship between pooled constructs of group dynamics, including social integration (SI), team leadership (TL), interpersonal facilitation (IF), group efficacy (GE); and effectiveness of university staff in those measures as in productivity (PD), adaptability (AD), and flexibility (FL). The sample size of 253 staff was selected from 2050 staff, and a self-structured questionnaire was designed. Instrument reliability was confirmed for the individual construct of GPD and staff effectiveness (SE) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) which was used to validate the instruments. The frequency and percentage table, means, and standard deviations were engaged as descriptive tools. Linear and multiple regressions and variance inflation factor were designed to test hypotheses and relationships. Findings revealed a significant statistical relationship between the dimensions of GPD and measures of staff effectiveness except for the dimension of GPD (SI) with a weak aggregate predictive contribution. The study posited the need for management of the federal universities to forge integration with staff through adapting strategies of group dynamics to improve the effectiveness of academic and non-academic staff of universities. Especially, staff with innate creative ability and genius for innovation should be supported and motivated to reach their potential.","PeriodicalId":43385,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organizational Leadership","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organizational Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2022.60625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research evidence linking managing group dynamic (GPD) to the effectiveness of academic and non-academic staff of Nigerian universities, is ostensibly scarce. While existing studies have majorly addressed the performance impact of group dynamics in general perspectives, there is a gap in gauging how managing dynamics in groups could lead to the effectiveness of staff of Nigerian universities. Built on two complementary theories, the study has sought to investigate the relationship between pooled constructs of group dynamics, including social integration (SI), team leadership (TL), interpersonal facilitation (IF), group efficacy (GE); and effectiveness of university staff in those measures as in productivity (PD), adaptability (AD), and flexibility (FL). The sample size of 253 staff was selected from 2050 staff, and a self-structured questionnaire was designed. Instrument reliability was confirmed for the individual construct of GPD and staff effectiveness (SE) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) which was used to validate the instruments. The frequency and percentage table, means, and standard deviations were engaged as descriptive tools. Linear and multiple regressions and variance inflation factor were designed to test hypotheses and relationships. Findings revealed a significant statistical relationship between the dimensions of GPD and measures of staff effectiveness except for the dimension of GPD (SI) with a weak aggregate predictive contribution. The study posited the need for management of the federal universities to forge integration with staff through adapting strategies of group dynamics to improve the effectiveness of academic and non-academic staff of universities. Especially, staff with innate creative ability and genius for innovation should be supported and motivated to reach their potential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理大学员工的群体动态和有效性:来自尼日利亚的证据
将群体动态管理(GPD)与尼日利亚大学学术和非学术人员的效率联系起来的研究证据表面上是稀缺的。虽然现有的研究主要是从一般角度研究群体动态对绩效的影响,但在衡量管理群体动态如何导致尼日利亚大学工作人员的效率方面存在差距。本研究以两种互补的理论为基础,探讨了群体动力学的集合构式,包括社会整合(SI)、团队领导(TL)、人际促进(IF)、群体效能(GE);大学员工在生产力(PD)、适应性(AD)和灵活性(FL)等方面的有效性。从2050名员工中选取253名员工,设计自构式问卷。对GPD的个体结构和员工有效性(SE)以及用于验证工具的验证性因子分析(CFA)验证了工具的信度。使用频率和百分比表、平均值和标准差作为描述工具。设计了线性和多元回归以及方差膨胀因子来检验假设和关系。调查结果显示,除了GPD (SI)维度具有较弱的总体预测贡献外,GPD维度与工作人员效能测量之间存在显著的统计关系。该研究提出,联邦大学的管理需要通过调整群体动力学策略来加强与工作人员的融合,以提高大学学术和非学术工作人员的效率。尤其要支持和激励有创新天赋和创造力的员工发挥他们的潜能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.10%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Linking Transformational Leadership With Organizational Performance: A PLS-SEM Integrated Model Examining the Mediating Role OF Innovative Work Behavior And Motivation Future of Work: New Work as a Saviour? An Assessment of Ethics in a Cross-Cultural Organizational Context: A Systematic Literature Review Evaluating the Interplay of Compensation Equity, Job Security, Presenteeism, and Work Enthusiasm in The Perception of Occupational Safety and Health Risks in the Estonian Workforce Functional Leadership in a Changing and Bounded World: The Relevance of Managerial Behavioral Training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1