Surrogate (Replacement) Motherhood or should the uterus be rented?

Dejan Donev
{"title":"Surrogate (Replacement) Motherhood or should the uterus be rented?","authors":"Dejan Donev","doi":"10.2478/pannonia-2019-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract After the birth of the “test-tube baby,” the triumphant success of reproductive technologies has dramatically accelerated scientific research in many fields and given hope to couples struggling with the problem of infertility. However, at the same time, new and numerous moral, ethical, bioethical, legal, social, cultural, and gender dilemmas and controversies have been imposed, especially in countries where trends of negative population growth are increasingly emphasized. These assisted reproductive technologies are making a difference, and not just from the aspect of medicine towards sterility. They are also profoundly affecting social and cultural patterns of marriage, partnership, parenting, and gender. Surrogate or surrogate motherhood, as part of the field of reproductive technology issues, calls for an urgent rethinking of the possibilities for institutionalized motherhood practices in contemporary society and its effects in everyday life. In other words, it is an attempt to demystify, denaturalize, and re-evaluate maternal norms, which always indicate relationships in specific material conditions of centralizing or decentralizing public or private power or sociability. However, they primarily and above all are related to the possibility of prior (bio)ethical evaluation, which would ensure sound legal regulation with respect to the possible (evil) use and commercialization of human life.","PeriodicalId":32127,"journal":{"name":"Pannoniana","volume":"86 1","pages":"214 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pannoniana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pannonia-2019-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract After the birth of the “test-tube baby,” the triumphant success of reproductive technologies has dramatically accelerated scientific research in many fields and given hope to couples struggling with the problem of infertility. However, at the same time, new and numerous moral, ethical, bioethical, legal, social, cultural, and gender dilemmas and controversies have been imposed, especially in countries where trends of negative population growth are increasingly emphasized. These assisted reproductive technologies are making a difference, and not just from the aspect of medicine towards sterility. They are also profoundly affecting social and cultural patterns of marriage, partnership, parenting, and gender. Surrogate or surrogate motherhood, as part of the field of reproductive technology issues, calls for an urgent rethinking of the possibilities for institutionalized motherhood practices in contemporary society and its effects in everyday life. In other words, it is an attempt to demystify, denaturalize, and re-evaluate maternal norms, which always indicate relationships in specific material conditions of centralizing or decentralizing public or private power or sociability. However, they primarily and above all are related to the possibility of prior (bio)ethical evaluation, which would ensure sound legal regulation with respect to the possible (evil) use and commercialization of human life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代孕(替代)母亲还是应该租用子宫?
“试管婴儿”诞生后,生殖技术的巨大成功极大地加速了许多领域的科学研究,给那些在不孕不育问题上苦苦挣扎的夫妇带来了希望。然而,与此同时,新的和无数的道德、伦理、生物伦理、法律、社会、文化和性别难题和争议,特别是在人口负增长趋势日益强调的国家。这些辅助生殖技术正在发挥作用,而不仅仅是从医学方面对不育的影响。它们也深刻地影响着婚姻、伴侣关系、养育子女和性别的社会和文化模式。代孕或代孕母亲作为生殖技术问题领域的一部分,迫切需要重新思考当代社会中制度化的母亲实践的可能性及其对日常生活的影响。换句话说,它是一种去神秘化、去自然化和重新评价母性规范的尝试,这些规范总是表明在集中或分散公共或私人权力或社交性的特定物质条件下的关系。然而,它们主要和最重要的是与事先(生物)伦理评估的可能性有关,这将确保对人类生命可能的(邪恶)使用和商业化进行健全的法律监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Environmental Aesthetics and Land Art The Development and Activity of the Society “Our Children” Belišće Bioethics and “The Most Important of the Least Important Things” Relationship Between Emergencies and Child Mental Health Anointing of the Sick in the Intensive Medicine Unit - Last Greeting or Call for Help
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1