Scoping review of approaches used for remote-access parathyroidectomy: A contemporary review of techniques, tools, pros and cons.

Head & neck surgery Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-25 DOI:10.1002/hed.27068
Yoshiyuki Saito, Yoshifumi Ikeda, Hiroshi Takami, Amr H Abdelhamid Ahmed, Atsushi Nakao, Hiroshi Katoh, Keiso Ho, Masato Tomita, Michio Sato, Neil S Tolley, Gregory W Randolph
{"title":"Scoping review of approaches used for remote-access parathyroidectomy: A contemporary review of techniques, tools, pros and cons.","authors":"Yoshiyuki Saito, Yoshifumi Ikeda, Hiroshi Takami, Amr H Abdelhamid Ahmed, Atsushi Nakao, Hiroshi Katoh, Keiso Ho, Masato Tomita, Michio Sato, Neil S Tolley, Gregory W Randolph","doi":"10.1002/hed.27068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After our coauthors described the first remote-access parathyroidectomy (RAP) series in 2000, several other approaches were developed. No systematic review has been performed to classify and evaluate RAP techniques. We performed a literature search using PubMed and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL). A total of 71 studies met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. RAP can be categorized into five approaches: (1) endoscopic and robotic axillary, (2) anterior chest, (3) transoral, (4) retroauricular, and (5) a combination of these approaches. The limited data in the literature suggest that the cure rates and safety of RAP are in no way inferior to those of open parathyroidectomy. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages, and the recommendations for the selection of each approach are listed. The selection of approach methods might depend on the surgeon's experience and familiarity and the patient's preference and disease status.</p>","PeriodicalId":75895,"journal":{"name":"Head & neck surgery","volume":"52 1","pages":"1976-1990"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After our coauthors described the first remote-access parathyroidectomy (RAP) series in 2000, several other approaches were developed. No systematic review has been performed to classify and evaluate RAP techniques. We performed a literature search using PubMed and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL). A total of 71 studies met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. RAP can be categorized into five approaches: (1) endoscopic and robotic axillary, (2) anterior chest, (3) transoral, (4) retroauricular, and (5) a combination of these approaches. The limited data in the literature suggest that the cure rates and safety of RAP are in no way inferior to those of open parathyroidectomy. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages, and the recommendations for the selection of each approach are listed. The selection of approach methods might depend on the surgeon's experience and familiarity and the patient's preference and disease status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程甲状旁腺切除术入路的范围综述:技术、工具、利弊的当代综述
在我们的合著者于2000年描述了第一个远程进入甲状旁腺切除术(RAP)系列之后,其他几种方法被开发出来。目前还没有对RAP技术进行分类和评价的系统综述。我们使用PubMed和Cochrane Library (CENTRAL)进行文献检索。共有71项研究符合我们的纳入/排除标准。RAP可分为五种入路:(1)内窥镜和机械腋窝入路,(2)胸前入路,(3)经口入路,(4)耳后入路,以及(5)这些入路的组合。有限的文献资料表明,RAP的治愈率和安全性并不逊于开放式甲状旁腺切除术。每种方法都有其优点和缺点,并列出了选择每种方法的建议。入路方法的选择可能取决于外科医生的经验和熟悉程度,以及患者的偏好和疾病状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scoping review of approaches used for remote-access parathyroidectomy: A contemporary review of techniques, tools, pros and cons. Analysis of cost and outcomes in bony versus soft tissue midface free flap reconstruction Pharyngeal tongue base augmentation for dysphagia therapy: A prospective case series in patients post head and neck cancer treatment Validated algorithms for identifying timing of second event of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using real‐world data Treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal: Critical analysis of persistent failures in diagnosis and surgery with a competing‐risk model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1