Non-invasive prenatal cell-free fetal DNA testing for down syndrome and other chromosomal abnormalities

D. Strah, P. Ovniček, J. Bernik
{"title":"Non-invasive prenatal cell-free fetal DNA testing for down syndrome and other chromosomal abnormalities","authors":"D. Strah, P. Ovniček, J. Bernik","doi":"10.6016/SLOVMEDJOUR.V84I11.1390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis as definitive diagnostic procedures represent a gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. The methods are invasive and lead to a miscarriage and fetal loss in approximately 0.5–1 %. Non-invasive prenatal DNA testing (NIPT) is based on the analysis of cell-free fetal DNA from maternal blood. It represents a highly accurate screening test for detecting the most common fetal chromosomal abnormalities. In our study we present the results of NIPT testing in the Diagnostic Center Strah, Slovenia, over the last 3 years. Methods: In our study, 123 pregnant women from 11th to 18th week of pregnancy were included. All of them had First trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21, done before NIPT testing. Results: 5 of total 6 high-risk NIPT cases (including 3 cases of Down syndrome and 2 cases of Klinefelter’s syndrome) were confirmed by fetal karyotyping. One case–Edwards syndrome was false positive. Patau syndrome, triple X syndrome or Turner syndrome were not observed in any of the cases. Furthermore, there were no false negative cases reported. In general, NIPT testing had 100 % sensitivity (95 % confidence interval: 46.29 %–100.00 %) and 98.95 % specificity (95 % confidence interval: 93.44 %–99.95 %). In determining Down syndrome alone, specificity (95 % confidence interval: 95.25 %- 100.00 %) and sensitivity (95 % confidence interval: 31.00 %–100.00 %) turned out to be 100 %. In 2015, the average turnaround time for analysis was 8.3 days from the day when the sample was taken. Repeated blood sampling was required in 2 cases (redraw rate = 1.6 %). Conclusions: Our results confirm that NIPT represents a fast, safe and highly accurate advanced screening test for most common chromosomal abnormalities. In current clinical practice, NIPT would significantly decrease the number of unnecessary invasive procedures and the rate of fetal loss caused by invasive diagnostics.","PeriodicalId":49350,"journal":{"name":"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal","volume":"62 1","pages":"727-733"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6016/SLOVMEDJOUR.V84I11.1390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis as definitive diagnostic procedures represent a gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. The methods are invasive and lead to a miscarriage and fetal loss in approximately 0.5–1 %. Non-invasive prenatal DNA testing (NIPT) is based on the analysis of cell-free fetal DNA from maternal blood. It represents a highly accurate screening test for detecting the most common fetal chromosomal abnormalities. In our study we present the results of NIPT testing in the Diagnostic Center Strah, Slovenia, over the last 3 years. Methods: In our study, 123 pregnant women from 11th to 18th week of pregnancy were included. All of them had First trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21, done before NIPT testing. Results: 5 of total 6 high-risk NIPT cases (including 3 cases of Down syndrome and 2 cases of Klinefelter’s syndrome) were confirmed by fetal karyotyping. One case–Edwards syndrome was false positive. Patau syndrome, triple X syndrome or Turner syndrome were not observed in any of the cases. Furthermore, there were no false negative cases reported. In general, NIPT testing had 100 % sensitivity (95 % confidence interval: 46.29 %–100.00 %) and 98.95 % specificity (95 % confidence interval: 93.44 %–99.95 %). In determining Down syndrome alone, specificity (95 % confidence interval: 95.25 %- 100.00 %) and sensitivity (95 % confidence interval: 31.00 %–100.00 %) turned out to be 100 %. In 2015, the average turnaround time for analysis was 8.3 days from the day when the sample was taken. Repeated blood sampling was required in 2 cases (redraw rate = 1.6 %). Conclusions: Our results confirm that NIPT represents a fast, safe and highly accurate advanced screening test for most common chromosomal abnormalities. In current clinical practice, NIPT would significantly decrease the number of unnecessary invasive procedures and the rate of fetal loss caused by invasive diagnostics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无创产前无细胞胎儿DNA检测唐氏综合症和其他染色体异常
背景:绒毛膜绒毛取样和羊膜穿刺术作为明确的诊断程序代表了产前诊断染色体异常的金标准。这些方法是侵入性的,导致大约0.5 - 1%的流产和胎儿丢失。非侵入性产前DNA检测(NIPT)是基于对母体血液中无细胞胎儿DNA的分析。它代表了一种高度准确的筛选试验,用于检测最常见的胎儿染色体异常。在我们的研究中,我们介绍了斯洛文尼亚斯特拉诊断中心在过去3年中NIPT测试的结果。方法:本研究纳入123例妊娠11 ~ 18周的孕妇。在NIPT测试之前,所有人都进行了21三体的妊娠早期风险评估。结果:6例高危NIPT中5例(其中唐氏综合征3例,Klinefelter综合征2例)经胎儿核型分析确诊。一例为爱德华兹综合征假阳性。所有病例均未见Patau综合征、triple X综合征、Turner综合征。此外,没有假阴性病例报告。一般来说,NIPT检测的灵敏度为100%(95%置信区间为46.29% ~ 100.00%),特异性为98.95%(95%置信区间为93.44% ~ 99.95%)。单独测定唐氏综合征时,特异性(95%置信区间:95.25% - 100.00%)和敏感性(95%置信区间:31.00% - 100.00%)均为100%。在2015年,分析的平均周转时间为8.3天,从样品采集之日起。2例需要重复采血(重抽率为1.6%)。结论:我们的研究结果证实,NIPT是一种快速、安全、高度准确的先进的染色体异常筛查方法。在目前的临床实践中,NIPT将显著减少不必要的侵入性手术次数和侵入性诊断导致的胎儿丢失率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The efficacy of an aerosol box to prevent infections during aerosol-generating procedures Sialendoscopy before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic THE EFFECT OF SARTANS ON THE PREGNANCY PARAVAGINAL AND RETROPERITONEAL HAEMATOMA POST PARTUM Iatrogenic streptococcus salivarius meningitis: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1