FIELD EVALUATION OF AUTOCIDAL GRAVID OVITRAP AND SIRENIX TRAP AGAINST CONTAINER INHABITING MOSQUITOES IN SAINT AUGUSTINE, NORTHEASTERN FLORIDA

Steven T. Smoleroff, Dena Autry, V. Aryaprema, R. Xue, W. Qualls
{"title":"FIELD EVALUATION OF AUTOCIDAL GRAVID OVITRAP AND SIRENIX TRAP AGAINST CONTAINER INHABITING MOSQUITOES IN SAINT AUGUSTINE, NORTHEASTERN FLORIDA","authors":"Steven T. Smoleroff, Dena Autry, V. Aryaprema, R. Xue, W. Qualls","doi":"10.32473/jfmca.70.1.133840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mosquito control programs are utilizing cost-effective long-term autocidal traps targeting the gravid population of container-inhabiting and other mosquito species, with the aim of reducing vector populations and disease transmission risk. In this field study we directly compared the efficacy of two autocidal trap types-the Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap (AGO) and SIRENIX mosquito trap in reducing mosquito abundances in St. Augustine, Florida to a control only site that had no autocidal traps deployed. Pre-treatment (wk1-4) and post-treatment (wk 5-14) adult mosquitoes were captured in all three sites using BG traps baited with BG lure and dry ice. Pre- and post-treatment trap counts of Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, Culex quinquefasciatus, and total mosquitoes (three species together) were compared to determine significant changes in abundance. Percent reduction in abundance of each species/group at the two trap sites were calculated to evaluate the trap efficacy at controlling Aedes and Culex container mosquitoes. Aedes albopictus populations were significantly reduced (86.6%) at the SIRENIX site compared to the populations at the AGO site (67.7% reduction). Ae. aegypti populations were reduced by 72.4% at the SIRENIX site compared to 25% at the AGO site. Culex quinquefasciatus population reduction at the SIRENIX site was 59.6% compared to 11.8% at the AGO site. The total mosquito group had only 45.1% and 10.3% reduction at the SIRENIX and AGO sites, respectively. Furthers studies conducted across the entire mosquito season would be required for full understanding of the effectiveness of these traps.","PeriodicalId":17272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Florida Mosquito Control Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Florida Mosquito Control Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32473/jfmca.70.1.133840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mosquito control programs are utilizing cost-effective long-term autocidal traps targeting the gravid population of container-inhabiting and other mosquito species, with the aim of reducing vector populations and disease transmission risk. In this field study we directly compared the efficacy of two autocidal trap types-the Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap (AGO) and SIRENIX mosquito trap in reducing mosquito abundances in St. Augustine, Florida to a control only site that had no autocidal traps deployed. Pre-treatment (wk1-4) and post-treatment (wk 5-14) adult mosquitoes were captured in all three sites using BG traps baited with BG lure and dry ice. Pre- and post-treatment trap counts of Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, Culex quinquefasciatus, and total mosquitoes (three species together) were compared to determine significant changes in abundance. Percent reduction in abundance of each species/group at the two trap sites were calculated to evaluate the trap efficacy at controlling Aedes and Culex container mosquitoes. Aedes albopictus populations were significantly reduced (86.6%) at the SIRENIX site compared to the populations at the AGO site (67.7% reduction). Ae. aegypti populations were reduced by 72.4% at the SIRENIX site compared to 25% at the AGO site. Culex quinquefasciatus population reduction at the SIRENIX site was 59.6% compared to 11.8% at the AGO site. The total mosquito group had only 45.1% and 10.3% reduction at the SIRENIX and AGO sites, respectively. Furthers studies conducted across the entire mosquito season would be required for full understanding of the effectiveness of these traps.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
佛罗里达州东北部圣奥古斯丁市自杀诱蚊诱卵器和sirenix诱蚊器对蚊虫孳生容器的现场评价
蚊虫控制项目利用具有成本效益的长期自杀诱捕器,针对容器蚊和其他蚊子种群的妊娠种群,目的是减少病媒种群和疾病传播风险。在这项实地研究中,我们直接比较了两种类型的自杀诱蚊器——自杀重力诱蚊器(AGO)和SIRENIX诱蚊器在减少佛罗里达州圣奥古斯丁和一个没有部署自杀诱蚊器的对照地点的蚊子丰度方面的效果。采用BG诱捕器和干冰诱捕,分别捕获处理前(1-4周)和处理后(5-14周)的成蚊。比较了处理前后埃及伊蚊、白纹伊蚊、致倦库蚊和蚊虫总数(共3种)的诱蚊器计数,确定了丰度的显著变化。计算两个诱捕点各物种/类群的丰度减少百分比,评价诱捕器对伊蚊和库蚊的控制效果。SIRENIX站点的白纹伊蚊种群数量较AGO站点(减少67.7%)显著减少(86.6%)。Ae。SIRENIX站点的埃及伊蚊数量减少了72.4%,而AGO站点的数量减少了25%。SIRENIX点致倦库蚊种群减少59.6%,AGO点致倦库蚊种群减少11.8%。SIRENIX和AGO位点蚊群总数分别减少45.1%和10.3%。为了充分了解这些诱捕器的有效性,需要在整个蚊子季节进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CAPTURING TRENDS IN ARBOVIRAL SURVEILLANCE: COMPARING TRADITIONAL REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION PCR AND QUANTITATIVE REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION PCR ASSAYS TEMPERATURE AND PHOTOPERIOD EFFECT ON DURATION OF GONOTROPHIC DEVELOPMENT AND FECUNDITY OF A LABORATORY COLONY OF AEDES ALBOPICTUS NOVEL TRAP CONFIGURATION FOR LIVE CAPTURE OF MOSQUITOES CRITICAL REVIEW OF INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE IN US AEDES ALBOPICTUS: RESISTANCE STATUS, UNDERLYING MECHANISMS, AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH INSECTICIDE TOXICITY TO HONEY BEES: LESSONS LEARNED FROM STUDIES BY THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA URBAN ENTOMOLOGY LABORATORY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1