Clinical value of sequential organ failure assessment score in evaluating organ function in acute pancreatitis

Xi Zheng, Lei Li, Yin Zhu, N. Lyu, W. He
{"title":"Clinical value of sequential organ failure assessment score in evaluating organ function in acute pancreatitis","authors":"Xi Zheng, Lei Li, Yin Zhu, N. Lyu, W. He","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2020.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the clinical value of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and revised Marshall score in evaluating organ function in acute pancreatitis (AP). \n \n \nMethods \nFrom January 2013 to December 2017, at the Department of Gastroenterology of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, the clinical data of 3 957 hospitalized AP patients were collected through the AP electronic database. AP was diagnosed and the severity of the disease was classified according to the revised Atlanta classification criteria. Organ function was evaluated by modified Marshall score and SOFA score. The correlation between SOFA score and mortality, pancreatic necrosis were analyzed. Chi-square test and Spearman correlation analysis were performed for statistical analysis. \n \n \nResults \nThe incidences of circulatory failure and renal failure determined by the SOFA score were higher than those of the modified Marshall score (4.80%, 190/3 957 vs. 3.03%, 120/3 957; 10.11%, 400/3 957 vs. 6.44%, 255/3 957), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=1 599.54 and 2 237.19, both P<0.01). Two score systems were consistent in determining the incidence of respiratory failure, which were 32.22% (1 275/3 957). The incidences of persistent circulatory failure (≥48 h) and persistent renal failure (≥48 h) determined by the SOFA score were higher than those of the modified Marshall score (1.64%, 65/3 957 vs. 0.76%, 30/3 957; 4.78%, 189/3 957 vs. 3.69%, 146/3 957), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=1 458.37 and 2 398.01, both P<0.01). The incidence of persistent respiratory failure (≥48 h) was same determined by two score systems, which were 10.24% (405/3 957). The proportion of patients with severe AP determined by SOFA score was higher than that of the modified Marshall score (25.30%, 1 001/3 957 vs. 18.83%, 745/3 957), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=718.216, P<0.01). The results of Spearman correlation analysis showed that SOFA total score was positively correlated with the overall mortality and the incidence of pancreatic necrosis (correlation coefficients r were 0.540 and 0.211, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (both P<0.01). \n \n \nConclusion \nSOFA score can comprehensively evaluate organ function in AP and is an important approach in determining prognosis. \n \n \nKey words: \nSequential organ failure assessment score; Acute pancreatitis; Revised Marshall score; Organ function","PeriodicalId":10009,"journal":{"name":"中华消化杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"110-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2020.02.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical value of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and revised Marshall score in evaluating organ function in acute pancreatitis (AP). Methods From January 2013 to December 2017, at the Department of Gastroenterology of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, the clinical data of 3 957 hospitalized AP patients were collected through the AP electronic database. AP was diagnosed and the severity of the disease was classified according to the revised Atlanta classification criteria. Organ function was evaluated by modified Marshall score and SOFA score. The correlation between SOFA score and mortality, pancreatic necrosis were analyzed. Chi-square test and Spearman correlation analysis were performed for statistical analysis. Results The incidences of circulatory failure and renal failure determined by the SOFA score were higher than those of the modified Marshall score (4.80%, 190/3 957 vs. 3.03%, 120/3 957; 10.11%, 400/3 957 vs. 6.44%, 255/3 957), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=1 599.54 and 2 237.19, both P<0.01). Two score systems were consistent in determining the incidence of respiratory failure, which were 32.22% (1 275/3 957). The incidences of persistent circulatory failure (≥48 h) and persistent renal failure (≥48 h) determined by the SOFA score were higher than those of the modified Marshall score (1.64%, 65/3 957 vs. 0.76%, 30/3 957; 4.78%, 189/3 957 vs. 3.69%, 146/3 957), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=1 458.37 and 2 398.01, both P<0.01). The incidence of persistent respiratory failure (≥48 h) was same determined by two score systems, which were 10.24% (405/3 957). The proportion of patients with severe AP determined by SOFA score was higher than that of the modified Marshall score (25.30%, 1 001/3 957 vs. 18.83%, 745/3 957), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=718.216, P<0.01). The results of Spearman correlation analysis showed that SOFA total score was positively correlated with the overall mortality and the incidence of pancreatic necrosis (correlation coefficients r were 0.540 and 0.211, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (both P<0.01). Conclusion SOFA score can comprehensively evaluate organ function in AP and is an important approach in determining prognosis. Key words: Sequential organ failure assessment score; Acute pancreatitis; Revised Marshall score; Organ function
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顺序脏器功能衰竭评分评价急性胰腺炎脏器功能的临床价值
目的比较顺序脏器功能衰竭评分(SOFA)与修正Marshall评分在急性胰腺炎(AP)脏器功能评价中的临床价值。方法通过AP电子数据库收集2013年1月至2017年12月南昌大学第一附属医院消化内科住院的3 957例AP患者的临床资料。诊断出AP,并根据修订的亚特兰大分类标准对疾病的严重程度进行分类。采用改良Marshall评分和SOFA评分评价脏器功能。分析SOFA评分与死亡率、胰腺坏死的相关性。采用卡方检验和Spearman相关分析进行统计学分析。结果SOFA评分判定循环衰竭和肾功能衰竭的发生率高于改良Marshall评分(4.80%,190/3 957比3.03%,120/3 957;10.11%(400/3 957)对6.44%(255/3 957),差异有统计学意义(χ2=1 599.54、2 237.19,P均<0.01)。两种评分系统在判断呼吸衰竭发生率方面一致,均为32.22%(1 275/3 957)。SOFA评分判定持续性循环衰竭(≥48 h)和持续性肾衰(≥48 h)的发生率高于改良Marshall评分(1.64%,65/3 957 vs 0.76%, 30/3 957;4.78%(189/3 957)对3.69%(146/3 957),差异均有统计学意义(χ2=1 458.37、2 398.01,P均<0.01)。两种评分系统对持续呼吸衰竭(≥48 h)的发生率相同,均为10.24%(405/3 957)。SOFA评分判定严重AP的患者比例高于改良Marshall评分(25.30%,1 001/3 957比18.83%,745/3 957),差异有统计学意义(χ2=718.216, P<0.01)。Spearman相关分析结果显示,SOFA总分与总死亡率、胰腺坏死发生率呈正相关(相关系数r分别为0.540、0.211),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论SOFA评分可综合评价AP脏器功能,是判断预后的重要指标。关键词:序贯性器官衰竭评分;急性胰腺炎;修订马歇尔分数;器官功能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8016
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal symptoms and liver function injury in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 Clinical characteristics of 70 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 accompanied with diarrhea Pay attention to the etiological analysis and management of 2019 coronavirus disease associated liver injury Considerations and suggestions on clinical research for coronavirus disease 2019 Digestive system manifestations and analysis of disease severity in 54 patients with coronavirus disease 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1