Students' emotional reactions when interacting with Information and Communication Technologies. A key element in improving assimilation

IF 0.4 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Qwerty Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.30557/qw000061

Mercedes Llorent-Vaquero, Juan De Pablos-Pons

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this work is to gain a better understanding of the relationship between the emotions that ICTs evoke in students and their assimilation of these technologies. To this end, a qualitative and descriptive methodology based on a student questionnaire was designed for data collection. The results show that ICTs evoked strong positive emotions in the students interacting with them, whose assimilation of these technologies was high. There were positive correlations between the level of assimilation of ICTs and all the emotions experienced by the students. There were also differences in the assimilation of ICTs in terms of the emotions analyzed. Therefore, research on students' emotional reactions when interacting with ICTs is essential for improving their assimilation.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

学生与资讯及通讯科技互动时的情绪反应。改善同化的关键因素

这项工作的目的是更好地理解信息通信技术在学生中唤起的情感与他们对这些技术的吸收之间的关系。为此，设计了一种基于学生问卷的定性和描述性方法来收集数据。结果表明，与信息通信技术互动的学生产生了强烈的积极情绪，他们对这些技术的同化程度很高。信息通信技术的同化水平与学生所经历的所有情绪之间存在正相关。就所分析的情绪而言，信息通信技术的同化也存在差异。因此，研究学生在与信息通信技术互动时的情绪反应对于提高他们的同化能力至关重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Qwerty COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Qwerty is the commonly accepted name for the computer keyboard, comprising the first six letters of its top row. When typewriters were first introduced, the keys were arranged in alphabetical order. However this order meant that people typed too quickly such that the keys soon became entangled. To counter this, the keys were displayed in random order and typing speeds accordingly slowed down. In later years, despite the fact that the problem of speed had been completely overcome, the keyboard retained its random order. In our view, this represents an excellent metaphor for the entanglement of culture and technological tools. In actual fact, we regard computer-based technologies as cultural artefacts, representing different depths in the daily work and study activity of individuals, social groups, and institutions. We believe that different models of computer use and activity within online environments mediate social interaction. As such, the relationship between culture and technological tools is becoming more and more complex and now provides an opportunity for determining new models of cognitive, psychological, and social interaction. Qwerty hopes to be a place where such issues can be discussed and developed. The journal arises from a growing awareness of the need to develop research and reflection on the impact, effects and nature of technology use and, as such, is intended to be a genuinely cross-disciplinary forum. Qwerty wishes to provide a forum for discussion on the use of new technologies aimed at anyone interested in the use of technology in such fields as education, training, social and university research, including the cultural, social, pedagogical, psychological, economic, professional, ethical and aesthetical aspects of technology use.