Validation of the Questionnaire on Sexual and Reproductive Health Literacy for Adolescents Age 15 to 19 Years in Lao People's Democratic Republic

V. Vongxay, Souksamone Thongmixay, Lianne Stoltenborg, Amphone Inthapanyo, V. Sychareun, Kongmany Chaleunvong, Dirk Rombout Essink
{"title":"Validation of the Questionnaire on Sexual and Reproductive Health Literacy for Adolescents Age 15 to 19 Years in Lao People's Democratic Republic","authors":"V. Vongxay, Souksamone Thongmixay, Lianne Stoltenborg, Amphone Inthapanyo, V. Sychareun, Kongmany Chaleunvong, Dirk Rombout Essink","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20220207-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Beyond sexual and reproductive health (SRH) knowledge, it is sexual and reproductive health literacy (SRHL) that reflects the capacity to deal with sexuality. Many interventions have been conducted to increase SRH knowledge in adolescents, but SRHL has rarely been measured, and a well-validated tool is needed to measure it. Objective: This study aimed to validate a tool to measure adolescent SRHL. Methods: Reliability, validity, and cultural equivalence were investigated using data from expert consultations, cognitive interviews, and two-pilot studies. Then adaptation was made to the SRHL questionnaire for correct use among Southeast Asian adolescents in Lao and in wider groups. Key Results: The SRHL tool was comprised of 39 question items focusing on teenage pregnancy, contraception, and abortion. Conceptual, item, and semantic equivalence were all met. Interviewer-administrated mode was found to be optimal. Each question offers the answer choices very difficult, difficult, easy, and very easy, with a good to excellent Cronbach's alpha (0.8–0.9); there were no missing items and no floor/ceiling effects. Construct validity was high as 6 of 7 hypotheses were confirmed. Conclusion: Validation was completed with good cross-cultural validity. The tool was shown to be effective in determining the level of SRHL in adolescents in Laos and potentially in other countries with similar cultures. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2022;6(1):e37–e50.] Plain Language Summary: To find out how much adolescents know about sexual and reproductive health, an appropriate instrument of measurement is needed. Using different methods, we investigated the performance of a new tool, namely the SRHL questionnaire, which has 39 questions and should be used with an interviewer to assist in recording responses. This new tool could be used effectively to determine the level of literacy on sexual and reproductive health among adolescents.","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"e37 - e50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20220207-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Beyond sexual and reproductive health (SRH) knowledge, it is sexual and reproductive health literacy (SRHL) that reflects the capacity to deal with sexuality. Many interventions have been conducted to increase SRH knowledge in adolescents, but SRHL has rarely been measured, and a well-validated tool is needed to measure it. Objective: This study aimed to validate a tool to measure adolescent SRHL. Methods: Reliability, validity, and cultural equivalence were investigated using data from expert consultations, cognitive interviews, and two-pilot studies. Then adaptation was made to the SRHL questionnaire for correct use among Southeast Asian adolescents in Lao and in wider groups. Key Results: The SRHL tool was comprised of 39 question items focusing on teenage pregnancy, contraception, and abortion. Conceptual, item, and semantic equivalence were all met. Interviewer-administrated mode was found to be optimal. Each question offers the answer choices very difficult, difficult, easy, and very easy, with a good to excellent Cronbach's alpha (0.8–0.9); there were no missing items and no floor/ceiling effects. Construct validity was high as 6 of 7 hypotheses were confirmed. Conclusion: Validation was completed with good cross-cultural validity. The tool was shown to be effective in determining the level of SRHL in adolescents in Laos and potentially in other countries with similar cultures. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2022;6(1):e37–e50.] Plain Language Summary: To find out how much adolescents know about sexual and reproductive health, an appropriate instrument of measurement is needed. Using different methods, we investigated the performance of a new tool, namely the SRHL questionnaire, which has 39 questions and should be used with an interviewer to assist in recording responses. This new tool could be used effectively to determine the level of literacy on sexual and reproductive health among adolescents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老挝人民民主共和国15至19岁青少年性健康和生殖健康知识调查表的验证
背景:除了性健康和生殖健康(SRH)知识之外,性健康和生殖健康素养(SRHL)也反映了处理性问题的能力。已经开展了许多干预措施来增加青少年的性生殖健康知识,但性生殖健康很少被测量,并且需要一个经过良好验证的工具来测量它。目的:本研究旨在验证一个测量青少年SRHL的工具。方法:采用专家咨询、认知访谈和双试点研究的数据,对信度、效度和文化等效性进行调查。然后对SRHL问卷进行调整,以便在老挝的东南亚青少年和更广泛的群体中正确使用。主要结果:SRHL工具由39个问题项组成,重点关注青少年怀孕、避孕和堕胎。概念、项目和语义都是等价的。面试官管理模式是最优的。每个问题提供了非常困难、困难、容易和非常容易的答案选项,Cronbach's alpha(0.8-0.9)从好到好;没有丢失的物品,也没有地板/天花板效果。建构效度高,7个假设中有6个被证实。结论:验证完成,具有良好的跨文化效度。该工具被证明在确定老挝青少年的SRHL水平方面是有效的,并且可能在具有类似文化的其他国家也是如此。健康素养研究与实践[j] .中国医学工程学报,2016;6(1):337 - 350。[英语泛读文摘:为了了解青少年对性健康和生殖健康的了解程度,需要一种适当的测量工具。使用不同的方法,我们调查了一种新工具的性能,即SRHL问卷,它有39个问题,应该与采访者一起使用,以协助记录回答。这一新工具可有效地用于确定青少年对性健康和生殖健康的扫盲水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Relation Between Health Literacy, Infodemic, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. Health Literacy and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal. Association of Social Determinants of Health With Hospital Readmission and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study. Health Literacy Directed Weight Loss Intervention in Primary Care Clinics. Get Health'e': A Pilot Test of a Digital Health Literacy Intervention for Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1