Health worries, sociopolitical attitudes, or both? Prospective predictors of COVID‐19 vaccine uptake in the Czech Republic

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-06-05 DOI:10.1111/spc3.12803
Jan Šerek, Martina Klicperová-Baker
{"title":"Health worries, sociopolitical attitudes, or both? Prospective predictors of COVID‐19 vaccine uptake in the Czech Republic","authors":"Jan Šerek, Martina Klicperová-Baker","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examined the effects of health worries and sociopolitical attitudes on subsequent COVID‐19 vaccine uptake. To avoid the potential bias of cross‐sectional research, we analyzed whether these variables were able to predict the vaccine uptake prospectively, that is, when measured at the beginning of the nationwide vaccination campaign. The source of data was a longitudinal quota panel of 863 (T1 March 2021) and 641 (T2 May 2022) adult citizens of the Czech Republic. Besides health worries, the survey covered distrust in politicians, submission to political authorities, and trust in people. Results showed that the likelihood of getting vaccinated against COVID‐19 at T2 was higher for participants who were more worried about the impact of COVID‐19 on their health and less distrustful of politicians at T1. Furthermore, a general trust in people at T1 predicted a more likely vaccine uptake at T2, while political submission had no effect. These results corroborate the roles of both health concerns and sociopolitical attitudes in COVID‐19 vaccine uptake. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Social & Personality Psychology Compass is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12803","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined the effects of health worries and sociopolitical attitudes on subsequent COVID‐19 vaccine uptake. To avoid the potential bias of cross‐sectional research, we analyzed whether these variables were able to predict the vaccine uptake prospectively, that is, when measured at the beginning of the nationwide vaccination campaign. The source of data was a longitudinal quota panel of 863 (T1 March 2021) and 641 (T2 May 2022) adult citizens of the Czech Republic. Besides health worries, the survey covered distrust in politicians, submission to political authorities, and trust in people. Results showed that the likelihood of getting vaccinated against COVID‐19 at T2 was higher for participants who were more worried about the impact of COVID‐19 on their health and less distrustful of politicians at T1. Furthermore, a general trust in people at T1 predicted a more likely vaccine uptake at T2, while political submission had no effect. These results corroborate the roles of both health concerns and sociopolitical attitudes in COVID‐19 vaccine uptake. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Social & Personality Psychology Compass is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康担忧,社会政治态度,还是两者兼而有之?捷克共和国COVID - 19疫苗接种的前瞻性预测因素
我们研究了健康担忧和社会政治态度对随后的COVID - 19疫苗接种的影响。为了避免横断面研究的潜在偏倚,我们分析了这些变量是否能够前瞻性地预测疫苗摄取,即在全国疫苗接种运动开始时进行测量。数据来源是捷克共和国863名成年公民(T1为2021年3月)和641名(T2为2022年5月)的纵向配额面板。除了对健康的担忧,调查还包括对政治家的不信任、对政治权威的服从和对人民的信任。结果显示,在T2阶段,那些更担心COVID - 19对自己健康的影响、对政治家的不信任程度较低的参与者,接种COVID - 19疫苗的可能性更高。此外,对T1人群的普遍信任预示着T2人群更有可能接种疫苗,而政治屈服则没有影响。这些结果证实了健康问题和社会政治态度在COVID - 19疫苗接种中的作用。《社会与人格心理学指南》是Wiley-Blackwell的财产,未经版权所有者的书面许可,其内容不得被复制或通过电子邮件发送到多个网站或发布到listserv。但是,用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用。这可以删节。对副本的准确性不作任何保证。用户应参阅原始出版版本的材料的完整。(版权适用于所有人。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Social and Personality Psychology Compass Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
The role of White identity in anti‐racist allyship On the experience of goals: Differentiating goal‐generic value from goal‐specific value The unseen pillar of behavior: A review of maintenance goals Spiritual capital and spiritual entrepreneurship: The new spiritualities and the processes of subjectivation Carving to excise, carving to create: Conversations on creating and sustaining safe spaces in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1