ANALYSIS OF STUDENT’S MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITY IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM BASED ON HOTS

S. Herawati, Puspa Amelia
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF STUDENT’S MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITY IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM BASED ON HOTS","authors":"S. Herawati, Puspa Amelia","doi":"10.31000/PRIMA.V5I2.3661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was focused onanalyzing student’s mathematical reasoning abilities in solving Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) problems anddetermining the level of student understanding of HOTS questions. The researchmethod is qualitative descriptive with 12 subjects. Based on the results of the test, the subject’s reasoning abilities were grouped into 3 categories of reasoning abilities, namely high, moderate and low. The results showed that students who had high reasoning abilities were able to fulfill the 7 mathematical reasoning indicators very well at each stage of real analysis problem solving and were able to work on HOTS levelquestions to analyze and create. Students with moderate reasoning abilities were only able to fulfill several indicators of mathematical reasoning, namely presenting written statements, solving problems as planned and checking again. Students who had low reasoning abilities were not able to understand the questions well, so students cannot solve it. Based on the results of the questionnaire, it was concluded that 46.67% of students could understand the HOTS problem well, 33% of the students could not plan the solution, namely writingdown the information that was known in answering the questions, and 33% of the students were not able to check the validity of an argument and draw conclusions on the evidence. Furthermore, it was obtained the relationship between student’s mathematical reasoning abilities and the level of student understanding of HOTS-oriented questions which fulfilled the linear regression equation Y = 71.574 + 0.009X.This model showed that the level of student understanding of HOTS-oriented questions had a positive effect on learning outcomes. Based on the research results, it was suggested that lecturers provide more training related toproof with the aim of improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities.  ","PeriodicalId":33718,"journal":{"name":"Prima Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prima Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31000/PRIMA.V5I2.3661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study was focused onanalyzing student’s mathematical reasoning abilities in solving Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) problems anddetermining the level of student understanding of HOTS questions. The researchmethod is qualitative descriptive with 12 subjects. Based on the results of the test, the subject’s reasoning abilities were grouped into 3 categories of reasoning abilities, namely high, moderate and low. The results showed that students who had high reasoning abilities were able to fulfill the 7 mathematical reasoning indicators very well at each stage of real analysis problem solving and were able to work on HOTS levelquestions to analyze and create. Students with moderate reasoning abilities were only able to fulfill several indicators of mathematical reasoning, namely presenting written statements, solving problems as planned and checking again. Students who had low reasoning abilities were not able to understand the questions well, so students cannot solve it. Based on the results of the questionnaire, it was concluded that 46.67% of students could understand the HOTS problem well, 33% of the students could not plan the solution, namely writingdown the information that was known in answering the questions, and 33% of the students were not able to check the validity of an argument and draw conclusions on the evidence. Furthermore, it was obtained the relationship between student’s mathematical reasoning abilities and the level of student understanding of HOTS-oriented questions which fulfilled the linear regression equation Y = 71.574 + 0.009X.This model showed that the level of student understanding of HOTS-oriented questions had a positive effect on learning outcomes. Based on the research results, it was suggested that lecturers provide more training related toproof with the aim of improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于热点的学生数学推理能力分析
本研究旨在分析学生在解决高阶思维技能(HOTS)问题时的数学推理能力,并确定学生对HOTS问题的理解水平。研究方法为定性描述,共12个研究对象。根据测试结果,将被试的推理能力分为高、中、低3类。结果表明,推理能力较强的学生在实际分析解题的各个阶段都能很好地完成7项数学推理指标,并能对HOTS级别的问题进行分析和创造。推理能力中等的学生只能完成数学推理的几个指标,即提出书面陈述、按计划解决问题和再次检查。推理能力低的学生不能很好地理解问题,所以学生不能解决问题。根据问卷调查的结果,46.67%的学生能够很好地理解HOTS问题,33%的学生不能计划解决方案,即写下回答问题时所知道的信息,33%的学生不能检查论点的有效性并根据证据得出结论。进一步得到学生数学推理能力与学生对hot -oriented problem理解水平之间的关系,满足线性回归方程Y = 71.574 + 0.009X。该模型表明,学生对热点问题的理解水平对学习结果有积极的影响。根据研究结果,建议教师提供更多与证明相关的培训,以提高学生的数学推理能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
EXPLORATION OF BATIK JAMBI ON LEARNING TRANSFORMATION GEOMETRY THE INFLUENCE OF SELF-CONFIDENCE ON THE MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS MATH ANXIETY AS A PREDICTOR OF MATH COMMUNICATION ABILITY ON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ERROR ANALYSIS IN SOLVING GEOMETRY PROBLEMS BASED ON NEWMAN'S ERROR ANALYSIS REVIEWED FROM LEARNING STYLES MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY IN VIEW OF LEARNING STYLES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1