Comparison of the Logical Use of Parenteral Antibiotics Before and After the Implementation of the Stewardship Program

A. Janbakhsh, Zahra Naghibifar, Sodabeh Eskandari, Zeinab Mohseniafshar, M. Zamanian
{"title":"Comparison of the Logical Use of Parenteral Antibiotics Before and After the Implementation of the Stewardship Program","authors":"A. Janbakhsh, Zahra Naghibifar, Sodabeh Eskandari, Zeinab Mohseniafshar, M. Zamanian","doi":"10.5812/jkums.117832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Excessive use of antibiotics has led to drug resistance. As such, stewardship programs are implemented to control antibiotic use in hospitalized patients. Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the frequency of antibiotic use after the implementation of the stewardship program. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on the patients admitted to Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah, Iran during 2017 - 2018. The required data were extracted from the pharmaceutical ward of the hospital. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 24. Results: The median per capita numerical and Rial consumption of caspofungin and linezolid antibiotics increased after the implementation of the stewardship plan, while the consumption of imipenem, amphotericin, teicoplanin, colistin, meropenem, voriconazole, and vancomycin was observed to decrease. In addition, the median per capita of the numerical use of caspofungin and linezolid increased in the surgery ward, intensive care unit (ICU), and internal medicine ward after the implementation of the stewardship plan. On the other hand, a reduction was observed in the use of amphotericin, colistin, voriconazole, and vancomycin in only one ward. The use of meropenem and teicoplanin also increased in the surgery ward and decreased in the other wards, while the use of imipenem increased in the ICU after implementing the plan and decreased in the other wards. The median use of antibiotics was not considered significant in the internal medicine ward, surgery ward, and ICU before and after implementing the stewardship program (P > 0.05). Conclusions: According to the results, antibiotic use slightly decreased after the implementation of the stewardship program. However, an increase was also observed in antibiotic prescription in some cases, which indicated that the stewardship program was not implemented properly, and no changes occurred in antibiotics prescription.","PeriodicalId":16201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums.117832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Excessive use of antibiotics has led to drug resistance. As such, stewardship programs are implemented to control antibiotic use in hospitalized patients. Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the frequency of antibiotic use after the implementation of the stewardship program. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on the patients admitted to Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah, Iran during 2017 - 2018. The required data were extracted from the pharmaceutical ward of the hospital. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 24. Results: The median per capita numerical and Rial consumption of caspofungin and linezolid antibiotics increased after the implementation of the stewardship plan, while the consumption of imipenem, amphotericin, teicoplanin, colistin, meropenem, voriconazole, and vancomycin was observed to decrease. In addition, the median per capita of the numerical use of caspofungin and linezolid increased in the surgery ward, intensive care unit (ICU), and internal medicine ward after the implementation of the stewardship plan. On the other hand, a reduction was observed in the use of amphotericin, colistin, voriconazole, and vancomycin in only one ward. The use of meropenem and teicoplanin also increased in the surgery ward and decreased in the other wards, while the use of imipenem increased in the ICU after implementing the plan and decreased in the other wards. The median use of antibiotics was not considered significant in the internal medicine ward, surgery ward, and ICU before and after implementing the stewardship program (P > 0.05). Conclusions: According to the results, antibiotic use slightly decreased after the implementation of the stewardship program. However, an increase was also observed in antibiotic prescription in some cases, which indicated that the stewardship program was not implemented properly, and no changes occurred in antibiotics prescription.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理计划实施前后肠外抗生素合理使用情况的比较
背景:抗生素的过度使用已导致耐药性。因此,实施管理方案以控制住院患者的抗生素使用。目的:本研究旨在评估管理计划实施后的抗生素使用频率。方法:回顾性研究2017 - 2018年在伊朗克尔曼沙阿伊玛目礼萨医院住院的患者。所需要的数据是从医院的药学病房提取的。数据分析采用SPSS version 24进行。结果:实施管理计划后,卡泊芬净和利奈唑胺类抗生素的人均用量中位数和使用量均有所增加,亚胺培南、两性霉素、替柯planin、粘菌素、美罗培南、伏立康唑、万古霉素的人均用量中位数和使用量均有所减少。此外,实施管理计划后,外科病房、重症监护病房(ICU)和内科病房的人均使用量中位数增加。另一方面,仅在一个病房中两性霉素、粘菌素、伏立康唑和万古霉素的使用减少。手术病房美罗培南和替柯planin的使用也增加,其他病房减少,而实施方案后ICU亚胺培南的使用增加,其他病房减少。实施管理方案前后内科病房、外科病房和ICU的抗生素使用中位数差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:根据结果,抗生素的使用在实施管理计划后略有下降。然而,在某些情况下,抗生素处方也有所增加,这表明管理计划没有得到适当实施,抗生素处方没有发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Effective Are In-Hospital Training Workshops on Infection Control for Physicians? First Report in Iran Capability of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Neonatal Care Quality in Iran Medicinal Chemistry is Shaping the World of Therapy Search Trends for Micronutrients on Google Trends in Iran for Historical Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Ecological Study The Effect of Quadruple Therapy Plus Probiotics on Helicobacter Pylori Eradication and Antibiotic-Associated Side Effects: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1