A Zulu king in conversation with the world: Translational and transcultural strategies in Chaka (1981) by Thomas Mofolo

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Journal of Literary Studies Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI:10.25159/1753-5387/10744
S. Loots
{"title":"A Zulu king in conversation with the world: Translational and transcultural strategies in Chaka (1981) by Thomas Mofolo","authors":"S. Loots","doi":"10.25159/1753-5387/10744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses Chaka (1981) by Thomas Mofolo as a transcultural text written by a transcultural author. It had hybrid origins, was written with local and global audiences in mind and forges linkages between different ethnicities, nations, languages and literary traditions. In this way it disrupts the centre periphery polarity associated with stark distinctions between “European” and “African” literatures. In shifting the attention to the transcultural entanglements without which Chaka would never have been written or read, I am being mindful of the view of Rebecca Walkowitz, outlined in her book Born Translated (2015), that some literary works begin collaboratively and comparatively, in multiple languages and geographical locations, and are targeted to readerships in various cultures and languages. Walkowitz examines the importance of these literary processes in contemporary Anglophone literature, but I will argue that Mofolo’s novel was in its own way “born translated” and displays many of the characteristics highlighted by Walkowitz in her discussions of writers like J. M. Coetzee, Haruki Marukami and Jamaica Kincaid. The article outlines how translation shaped Mofolo’s novel and became a condition of its production, how its literary and political meanings are influenced by the fact that it exists in different editions in different languages and in different markets, and the multiple ways in which Mofolo’s novel can be understood as “born translated” writing.","PeriodicalId":43700,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Literary Studies","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1753-5387/10744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article discusses Chaka (1981) by Thomas Mofolo as a transcultural text written by a transcultural author. It had hybrid origins, was written with local and global audiences in mind and forges linkages between different ethnicities, nations, languages and literary traditions. In this way it disrupts the centre periphery polarity associated with stark distinctions between “European” and “African” literatures. In shifting the attention to the transcultural entanglements without which Chaka would never have been written or read, I am being mindful of the view of Rebecca Walkowitz, outlined in her book Born Translated (2015), that some literary works begin collaboratively and comparatively, in multiple languages and geographical locations, and are targeted to readerships in various cultures and languages. Walkowitz examines the importance of these literary processes in contemporary Anglophone literature, but I will argue that Mofolo’s novel was in its own way “born translated” and displays many of the characteristics highlighted by Walkowitz in her discussions of writers like J. M. Coetzee, Haruki Marukami and Jamaica Kincaid. The article outlines how translation shaped Mofolo’s novel and became a condition of its production, how its literary and political meanings are influenced by the fact that it exists in different editions in different languages and in different markets, and the multiple ways in which Mofolo’s novel can be understood as “born translated” writing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《与世界对话的祖鲁国王:查卡语的翻译和跨文化策略》(1981),作者托马斯·莫福罗
本文将Thomas Mofolo的《Chaka》(1981)作为跨文化作者的跨文化文本进行讨论。它的起源是混合的,写作时考虑到当地和全球的观众,并在不同的种族、国家、语言和文学传统之间建立了联系。通过这种方式,它打破了与“欧洲”和“非洲”文学之间明显区别相关的中心边缘极性。在将注意力转移到跨文化的纠缠上时,我注意到丽贝卡·瓦尔科维茨(Rebecca Walkowitz)在她的书《出生的翻译》(2015)中概述的观点,即一些文学作品以多种语言和地理位置开始合作和比较,并针对不同文化和语言的读者。瓦尔科维茨考察了这些文学过程在当代英语文学中的重要性,但我认为莫福罗的小说以自己的方式“生来就是翻译的”,并展示了瓦尔科维茨在讨论j·m·库切、小春树和牙买加·金凯德等作家时所强调的许多特征。本文概述了翻译如何塑造了莫福罗的小说,并成为其创作的条件,它以不同的语言和不同的市场以不同的版本存在,这一事实如何影响了它的文学和政治意义,以及莫福罗的小说可以被理解为“天生的翻译”写作的多种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Literary Studies publishes and globally disseminates original and cutting-edge research informed by Literary and Cultural Theory. The Journal is an independent quarterly publication owned and published by the South African Literary Society in partnership with Unisa Press and Taylor & Francis. It is housed and produced in the division Theory of Literature at the University of South Africa and is accredited and subsidised by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training. The aim of the journal is to publish articles and full-length review essays informed by Literary Theory in the General Literary Theory subject area and mostly covering Formalism, New Criticism, Semiotics, Structuralism, Marxism, Poststructuralism, Psychoanalysis, Gender studies, New Historicism, Ecocriticism, Animal Studies, Reception Theory, Comparative Literature, Narrative Theory, Drama Theory, Poetry Theory, and Biography and Autobiography.
期刊最新文献
The Typewriter’s Tale: Re-Exploring the Historical Figure of Henry James through Fiction Blackface on the South African Stage Culpability and Nature-Nature Infractions in Select Poems in Tanure Ojaide’s Narrow Escapes: A Poetic Diary of the Coronavirus Pandemic LGBTQ+ Literature in the West: From Ancient Times to the Twenty-First Century, by Robert C. Evans The Construction of Identities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1