Perception of Rabies among Residents of Selected Local Government Areas of Oyo State, Nigeria

O. Adejumobi, O. Omobowale, S. Olaogun, T. Omobowale, H. O. Nottidge
{"title":"Perception of Rabies among Residents of Selected Local Government Areas of Oyo State, Nigeria","authors":"O. Adejumobi, O. Omobowale, S. Olaogun, T. Omobowale, H. O. Nottidge","doi":"10.5455/JVA.196912310400000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rabies, a fatal neurotropic disease of man and animals is usually a neglected disease in many parts of the world probably because of the erroneous belief that it affects animals predominantly. This study was designed to investigate the knowledge and attitude of people in selected communities of Oyo State, Nigeria with the aim of assessing the possible risk of getting infected with the virus. A total of 323 participants were randomly selected from 10 local government areas of Oyo State, Nigeria and interviewed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. The results were analysed using descriptive statistics and Pearsons chi square method. Information obtained included the demographic characteristics of the participants, their interaction with dogs, knowledge about rabies and its fatality, its mode of transmission and prevention as well as the perception of and attitude of people towards rabies. Of the 323 participants, 180 (55.8%) were male while 143 (44.3%) were female, 115 (47.7%) were Christians, 123 (51%) were muslims and 3 (1.2%) were traditional religion adherents. Furthermore, 263 (81.4%) had different levels of education 60 (18.6 %) were illiterate, 119 (36.8%) used to own dog while only 54 (16.4%) presently kept dogs for reasons which included hunting 16 (30.1%), security 28 (52.8%), breeding {3 (5.66%)} and as companionship 6 (11.3%). Greater number (80%) lived in the rural areas while 62 (19.6%) were urban dwellers. Out of the 323 participants, 256 (79.5%) knew about rabies, of these, 46 (18%) heard about the disease from awareness campaigns, 11 (4.3%) heard from human and veterinary hospitals 58 (22.7%) heard from interpersonal interactions while 123 (48.1%) knew by personal experiences. From the people that claimed knowledge, 231 (90.2%) knew that rabies was a fatal disease, 96 (37.5%) knew about rabies in other animal species aside dogs, 110 (43%) knew about rabies transmission by dog or cat bite, 24 (9.4%) knew that rabies can be transmitted by wild animals. Also, 130 (50.8%) claimed knowledge of rabies prevention in animals but 88 (34.4%) only knew about antirabies vaccination in animals. Similarly, 128 (50%) claimed knowledge of rabies prevention in man and of these, 38 (14.8%) recommended prophylactic and post exposure antirabies vaccination, 42 (16%) hospital visits, 20 (7.8%) dog elimination and staying away from dogs, while 12 (4.7%) recommended religious means, and use of herbs. When asked about first aid treatment, 99 (38.7%) suggested wound washing with soap and antiseptic, 171 (66.8%) recommended hospital visit while 40 (15.6%) suggested a visit to the herbalist for the antidote. Pearsons chi square showed significant difference (PKey words: Rabies, perception, attitude.","PeriodicalId":17430,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Advances","volume":"73 1","pages":"1242-1250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JVA.196912310400000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Rabies, a fatal neurotropic disease of man and animals is usually a neglected disease in many parts of the world probably because of the erroneous belief that it affects animals predominantly. This study was designed to investigate the knowledge and attitude of people in selected communities of Oyo State, Nigeria with the aim of assessing the possible risk of getting infected with the virus. A total of 323 participants were randomly selected from 10 local government areas of Oyo State, Nigeria and interviewed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. The results were analysed using descriptive statistics and Pearsons chi square method. Information obtained included the demographic characteristics of the participants, their interaction with dogs, knowledge about rabies and its fatality, its mode of transmission and prevention as well as the perception of and attitude of people towards rabies. Of the 323 participants, 180 (55.8%) were male while 143 (44.3%) were female, 115 (47.7%) were Christians, 123 (51%) were muslims and 3 (1.2%) were traditional religion adherents. Furthermore, 263 (81.4%) had different levels of education 60 (18.6 %) were illiterate, 119 (36.8%) used to own dog while only 54 (16.4%) presently kept dogs for reasons which included hunting 16 (30.1%), security 28 (52.8%), breeding {3 (5.66%)} and as companionship 6 (11.3%). Greater number (80%) lived in the rural areas while 62 (19.6%) were urban dwellers. Out of the 323 participants, 256 (79.5%) knew about rabies, of these, 46 (18%) heard about the disease from awareness campaigns, 11 (4.3%) heard from human and veterinary hospitals 58 (22.7%) heard from interpersonal interactions while 123 (48.1%) knew by personal experiences. From the people that claimed knowledge, 231 (90.2%) knew that rabies was a fatal disease, 96 (37.5%) knew about rabies in other animal species aside dogs, 110 (43%) knew about rabies transmission by dog or cat bite, 24 (9.4%) knew that rabies can be transmitted by wild animals. Also, 130 (50.8%) claimed knowledge of rabies prevention in animals but 88 (34.4%) only knew about antirabies vaccination in animals. Similarly, 128 (50%) claimed knowledge of rabies prevention in man and of these, 38 (14.8%) recommended prophylactic and post exposure antirabies vaccination, 42 (16%) hospital visits, 20 (7.8%) dog elimination and staying away from dogs, while 12 (4.7%) recommended religious means, and use of herbs. When asked about first aid treatment, 99 (38.7%) suggested wound washing with soap and antiseptic, 171 (66.8%) recommended hospital visit while 40 (15.6%) suggested a visit to the herbalist for the antidote. Pearsons chi square showed significant difference (PKey words: Rabies, perception, attitude.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚奥约州选定地方政府区域居民对狂犬病的看法
狂犬病是人类和动物的一种致命的嗜神经疾病,在世界许多地方通常被忽视,这可能是因为人们错误地认为它主要影响动物。这项研究的目的是调查尼日利亚奥约州选定社区中人们的知识和态度,以评估感染该病毒的可能风险。从尼日利亚奥约州的10个地方政府区随机抽取了323名参与者,并使用预先测试的结构化问卷进行了访谈。采用描述性统计和皮尔逊卡方方法对结果进行分析。获得的信息包括参与者的人口统计特征、他们与狗的互动、对狂犬病及其致死率的认识、狂犬病的传播方式和预防,以及人们对狂犬病的看法和态度。在323名参与者中,男性180人(55.8%),女性143人(44.3%),基督徒115人(47.7%),穆斯林123人(51%),传统宗教信徒3人(1.2%)。此外,263人(81.4%)受过不同程度的教育,60人(18.6%)不识字,119人(36.8%)曾经养狗,而目前养狗的原因只有54人(16.4%),其中包括狩猎16人(30.1%),安全28人(52.8%),饲养3人(5.66%)和陪伴6人(11.3%)。更多的人(80%)生活在农村地区,而62人(19.6%)是城市居民。在323名参与者中,256人(79.5%)了解狂犬病,其中46人(18%)从宣传活动中听说过狂犬病,11人(4.3%)从人类和兽医医院听说过狂犬病,58人(22.7%)从人际交往中听说过狂犬病,123人(48.1%)通过个人经历知道狂犬病。在认知者中,231人(90.2%)知道狂犬病是一种致命疾病,96人(37.5%)知道除犬外的其他动物的狂犬病,110人(43%)知道狂犬病通过狗或猫咬伤传播,24人(9.4%)知道狂犬病可以通过野生动物传播。130人(50.8%)表示了解动物狂犬病预防知识,88人(34.4%)仅了解动物抗狂犬病疫苗接种。同样,128人(50%)声称了解人类狂犬病预防,其中38人(14.8%)建议预防性和接触后抗狂犬病疫苗接种,42人(16%)去医院就诊,20人(7.8%)消灭狗和远离狗,而12人(4.7%)建议宗教手段和使用草药。当被问及急救处理时,99名(38.7%)建议用肥皂和消毒剂清洗伤口,171名(66.8%)建议去医院,40名(15.6%)建议去看草药医生解毒剂。关键词:狂犬病,感知,态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genetics and its role in the control of animal diseases: A brief review Serodiagnosis of wildlife leptospirosis employing recombinant leptospiral immunoglobulin like b protein antigen Major treats of skin and hides in Ethiopian leather industry: A review Different Estrous Induction Protocols During the Non-Breeding Season in Assaf Ewes Study on bovine hydatidosis and its economic significance at Shashemene municipal abattoir, Southern Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1