The Discussions Regarding The Belonging of Qur’ânic Words in The Tradition of Tafsir and The Critique of Them

Kader Pub Date : 2022-06-19 DOI:10.18317/kaderdergi.1052480
Zakir Demi̇r
{"title":"The Discussions Regarding The Belonging of Qur’ânic Words in The Tradition of Tafsir and The Critique of Them","authors":"Zakir Demi̇r","doi":"10.18317/kaderdergi.1052480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When viewed the history of Islamic thought, it is seen that the scholars have made an effort to understand the nature of the speech of God and make sense of it. Essentially, understanding and grasping of the words of God are an effort to look from the physical realm to the metaphysical one. In spite of this fact, the scholars as the indomitable seekers of truth are in search of finding some clues to say about it. While some of them consider the “divine speech” as an attribute of God, many others view it as a divine act. It is also admitted by all of them that whether being attributive or act of God, the reflection of the divine speech is the Qur’ân. In this sense, three views have been put forward on the question of the belonging of the Qur’ânic words. According to the dominant and preferred point of view among these views, Qur’ân belongs to God in terms of wording and meaning. Accordingly, the revelation of the Qur’ân, which was revealed to the Prophet Mohammed consists of both wording and meaning. Therefore, there is no intervention or contribution of Gabriel or Muhammad in constituting of Qur’ân. According to the second approach, the meaning of Qur’ânic text belongs to God, however, its words pertain to Mohammed. This view signals that Gabriel revealed nothing more than the meanings of Qur’ân. Mohammed understands the meanings conveyed to him and then said them in Arabic expression patterns and phrases. According to the third approach, the meanings of Qur’ânic text belongs to God, however, its words pertain to Gabriel. In other words, only meanings of text were given to Gabriel, and its words are formed by him. In the present study, the mentioned approaches which are put forward by scholars about the belonging of Qur’ânic words will be examined in terms of the integrity of the Qur’ân and Tafsir rumors (riwâyât) of the classical period. In a nutshell, it can be said that there is no disagreement among scholars in the field of the belonging of the meanings of Qur’ânic text to God. The main disagreement is whether the Qur’ânic words belong to God, Gabriel or Muhammad. Considering the integrity of Qur’ân and Tafsir rumors regarding to the circumstances of sending down of the Qur’ânic revelation, it has been determined that the prevailing view is more consistent than the other two views.","PeriodicalId":17877,"journal":{"name":"Kader","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18317/kaderdergi.1052480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When viewed the history of Islamic thought, it is seen that the scholars have made an effort to understand the nature of the speech of God and make sense of it. Essentially, understanding and grasping of the words of God are an effort to look from the physical realm to the metaphysical one. In spite of this fact, the scholars as the indomitable seekers of truth are in search of finding some clues to say about it. While some of them consider the “divine speech” as an attribute of God, many others view it as a divine act. It is also admitted by all of them that whether being attributive or act of God, the reflection of the divine speech is the Qur’ân. In this sense, three views have been put forward on the question of the belonging of the Qur’ânic words. According to the dominant and preferred point of view among these views, Qur’ân belongs to God in terms of wording and meaning. Accordingly, the revelation of the Qur’ân, which was revealed to the Prophet Mohammed consists of both wording and meaning. Therefore, there is no intervention or contribution of Gabriel or Muhammad in constituting of Qur’ân. According to the second approach, the meaning of Qur’ânic text belongs to God, however, its words pertain to Mohammed. This view signals that Gabriel revealed nothing more than the meanings of Qur’ân. Mohammed understands the meanings conveyed to him and then said them in Arabic expression patterns and phrases. According to the third approach, the meanings of Qur’ânic text belongs to God, however, its words pertain to Gabriel. In other words, only meanings of text were given to Gabriel, and its words are formed by him. In the present study, the mentioned approaches which are put forward by scholars about the belonging of Qur’ânic words will be examined in terms of the integrity of the Qur’ân and Tafsir rumors (riwâyât) of the classical period. In a nutshell, it can be said that there is no disagreement among scholars in the field of the belonging of the meanings of Qur’ânic text to God. The main disagreement is whether the Qur’ânic words belong to God, Gabriel or Muhammad. Considering the integrity of Qur’ân and Tafsir rumors regarding to the circumstances of sending down of the Qur’ânic revelation, it has been determined that the prevailing view is more consistent than the other two views.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论塔夫西尔传统中古兰经词语的归属及其批判
回顾伊斯兰思想史,我们可以看到,学者们一直在努力理解上帝话语的本质,并使之有意义。从本质上讲,理解和把握上帝的话语是一种从物质领域到形而上学领域的努力。尽管如此,学者们作为不屈不挠的真理追求者仍在寻找一些线索来说明这一点。虽然他们中的一些人认为“神圣的话语”是上帝的属性,但许多人认为这是一种神圣的行为。他们也都承认,无论是神的属性还是神的行为,古兰经都是神话语的反映。在这个意义上,对古兰经的 nic词的归属问题提出了三种观点。根据这些观点中占主导地位和偏爱的观点,古兰经在措辞和意义上属于上帝。因此,启示给先知穆罕默德的《古兰经》既有措辞也有意义。因此,在《古兰经》的构成中,没有加百列或穆罕默德的干预或贡献。根据第二种方法,古兰经的含义是属于上帝的,然而,它的话语属于穆罕默德。这种观点表明,加百列所揭示的不过是古兰经的含义。穆罕默德理解传达给他的意思,然后用阿拉伯语的表达方式和短语说出来。根据第三种方法,古兰经的含义属于上帝,然而,它的话语属于加百列。换句话说,只有文本的意义被赋予了加布里埃尔,它的文字是由他形成的。在本研究中,将从古典时期的《古兰经》和《塔夫瑟尔谣言》(riw y)的完整性出发,对学者们提出的上述关于古兰经词语归属的方法进行考察。概括地说,学者们对于《古兰经》 nic文本的意义归属于上帝的问题没有分歧。主要的分歧在于《古兰经》中的词语是属于上帝、加百列还是穆罕默德。考虑到《古兰经》和《塔夫瑟尔》关于《古兰经》启示降下的情况的谣言的完整性,可以确定,主流观点比其他两种观点更一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
God, Logic and Lies: Intra-Ḥanafī Polemics on Divine Omnipotence in Colonial India The Transformation of Radjʿa Doctrine of Shiʿa: A Case Study on the Nusayrīs, the Druzes and the Bābī-Bahāīs Muhammed Cân Yûsuf el-Karabâğî’nin Zorunlu Varlık Konusunda Bir Risâlesi: Tahkik ve Değerlendirme The Place And Importance of Dalāʾil al-nubuwwa In The Context of The Defense of Prophethood Özbekistan'da Bilimsel Ateizm Gelişiminin Retrospektif Analizi (XX. Yüzyılın 30'larında)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1