Challenges to develop scientometric studies

IF 0.2 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI:10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-37-58
A. Guskov, Y. Shrayberg
{"title":"Challenges to develop scientometric studies","authors":"A. Guskov, Y. Shrayberg","doi":"10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-37-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors  examine  the  key problems  inhibiting  scientometric studies and  scientific  communications. These  challenges call  for significant  efforts  and professional courage. Firstly, this is the need for open access to scientometric data and improvement of their  quality  and comprehensiveness, including  author  data, affiliations, citations  and meta  information.  The authors  emphasize the  necessity for large-scale introduction of technologies for identifying  objects  of science  information   (i.  e.  publications,  researchers,  organizations,  projects,  etc.),  which would enable  to decrease significantly the number of bibliographic  mistakes.When projecting  scientometric studies, the  edge  of objects  and analysis  instruments have  to be defined  by the  goals  rather  than  by bibliometric  database limitations.  Indexing  of scientific  publications is among  the  key instruments. Its advancement is determined by emerging  and low-quality  classifications of bibliometric  databases, their  differences, and  changing  science  structure.  Finally, the propriety  of scientometric methods  and results  interpretation, in particular  that  of scientometric performance assessment, have to be controlled.    Meeting these challenges will enable  to provide  efficient  monitoring  of scientific  activity based on  operative  collection, processing  and  analysis  of scientific  information  flows rather  than  on annual  statistical surveys. This transfer  would improve monitoring significantly and expand  the spectrum  of solutions;  it would also enable  to reveal system changes  in research, to respond  to disparities  in development, and to make the solutions  in science management more efficient.","PeriodicalId":42851,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-37-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The authors  examine  the  key problems  inhibiting  scientometric studies and  scientific  communications. These  challenges call  for significant  efforts  and professional courage. Firstly, this is the need for open access to scientometric data and improvement of their  quality  and comprehensiveness, including  author  data, affiliations, citations  and meta  information.  The authors  emphasize the  necessity for large-scale introduction of technologies for identifying  objects  of science  information   (i.  e.  publications,  researchers,  organizations,  projects,  etc.),  which would enable  to decrease significantly the number of bibliographic  mistakes.When projecting  scientometric studies, the  edge  of objects  and analysis  instruments have  to be defined  by the  goals  rather  than  by bibliometric  database limitations.  Indexing  of scientific  publications is among  the  key instruments. Its advancement is determined by emerging  and low-quality  classifications of bibliometric  databases, their  differences, and  changing  science  structure.  Finally, the propriety  of scientometric methods  and results  interpretation, in particular  that  of scientometric performance assessment, have to be controlled.    Meeting these challenges will enable  to provide  efficient  monitoring  of scientific  activity based on  operative  collection, processing  and  analysis  of scientific  information  flows rather  than  on annual  statistical surveys. This transfer  would improve monitoring significantly and expand  the spectrum  of solutions;  it would also enable  to reveal system changes  in research, to respond  to disparities  in development, and to make the solutions  in science management more efficient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展科学计量学研究的挑战
作者探讨了阻碍科学计量学研究和科学传播的关键问题。这些挑战需要巨大的努力和专业的勇气。首先,这是对科学计量数据开放获取的需求,并提高其质量和全面性,包括作者数据、隶属关系、引文和元信息。作者强调有必要大规模引进识别科学信息对象(即出版物、研究人员、组织、项目等)的技术,这将大大减少书目错误的数量。当规划科学计量学研究时,对象和分析工具的边缘必须由目标来定义,而不是由文献计量学数据库的限制来定义。科学出版物的索引是关键工具之一。它的进步是由新兴的和低质量的文献计量数据库分类、它们之间的差异和不断变化的科学结构决定的。最后,科学计量学方法和结果解释的适当性,特别是科学计量学绩效评估的适当性,必须加以控制。迎接这些挑战将使我们能够根据科学信息流的实际收集、处理和分析,而不是根据年度统计调查,对科学活动进行有效监测。这种转移将大大改善监测并扩大解决办法的范围;它还将能够揭示研究中的制度变化,对发展中的差异作出反应,并使科学管理中的解决办法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Grouping and categorizing library services at the official websites of central libraries of RF constituent territories: The need for standardized diversification The review of scientific research conducted by libraries: What comes next? Verification of classification modernization solutions (the case study of Library Bibliographic Classification) The virtual reality technologies in the educational processes in Kemerovo State Institute of Culture Special components of society digital transformation to influence technological and behavioral models of modern libraries (Annual report at the Seventh World Professional Forum “SOCHI–2023”)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1