Microbiota in monocultured Litopenaeus vannamei vs. polyculture with Trachinotus ovatus

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 FISHERIES Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-bamidgeh Pub Date : 2023-01-05 DOI:10.46989/001c.67771
Yuan Xue, Jianing Zhou, Xieyan Chen, Minze Liao, Lin Zhang, Jingjing Xie, Chengbo Sun
{"title":"Microbiota in monocultured Litopenaeus vannamei vs. polyculture with Trachinotus ovatus","authors":"Yuan Xue, Jianing Zhou, Xieyan Chen, Minze Liao, Lin Zhang, Jingjing Xie, Chengbo Sun","doi":"10.46989/001c.67771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The structures of the microbial community in the intestine, aquaculture water, and sediment of Litopenaeus vannamei, both in monoculture and mixed culture with Trachinotus ovatus, were analyzed by sequencing 16S rRNA amplicons. 1,120,500 valid reads were obtained from 21 samples, and 3,767 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were classified. In the two culture modes, the abundance and diversity of bacterial in the sediment were significantly higher than in the L. vannamei intestine under the monoculture mode, in the water and intestines of L. vannamei and T. ovatus under the mix-culture mode (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the intestinal flora structures of L. vannamei and T. ovatus in the monoculture mode (P > 0.05). The dominant phyla in the sediment under two culture modes were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Chloroflexi. The microbial community structure in the water and L. vannamei intestine were similar in both culture modes. The dominant phyla included Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria, with their abundances ranging from 80.88% to 97.10%. Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum in each group of samples, and the dominant genus in both culture modes was GpIIa. There was little difference in microbial community structures under the two culture modes; while the culture mode did not affect the core phyla/genera, there were differences in relative abundance. The experimental results provide a reference for the exploration of efficient and specific probiotic screening and microbial formulation techniques.","PeriodicalId":14704,"journal":{"name":"Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-bamidgeh","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-bamidgeh","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46989/001c.67771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The structures of the microbial community in the intestine, aquaculture water, and sediment of Litopenaeus vannamei, both in monoculture and mixed culture with Trachinotus ovatus, were analyzed by sequencing 16S rRNA amplicons. 1,120,500 valid reads were obtained from 21 samples, and 3,767 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were classified. In the two culture modes, the abundance and diversity of bacterial in the sediment were significantly higher than in the L. vannamei intestine under the monoculture mode, in the water and intestines of L. vannamei and T. ovatus under the mix-culture mode (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the intestinal flora structures of L. vannamei and T. ovatus in the monoculture mode (P > 0.05). The dominant phyla in the sediment under two culture modes were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Chloroflexi. The microbial community structure in the water and L. vannamei intestine were similar in both culture modes. The dominant phyla included Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria, with their abundances ranging from 80.88% to 97.10%. Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum in each group of samples, and the dominant genus in both culture modes was GpIIa. There was little difference in microbial community structures under the two culture modes; while the culture mode did not affect the core phyla/genera, there were differences in relative abundance. The experimental results provide a reference for the exploration of efficient and specific probiotic screening and microbial formulation techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用16S rRNA扩增子测序方法分析了凡纳滨对虾(Litopenaeus vannamei)在单养殖和与卵形沙盘虫(Trachinotus ovatus)混合养殖中肠道、养殖水体和沉积物中的微生物群落结构。从21份样本中获得1,120,500个有效reads,分类出3,767个操作分类单位(operational taxonomic units, otu)。在两种培养模式下,沉积物中细菌的丰度和多样性均显著高于单一培养模式下的凡纳梅螺旋藻肠道、混合培养模式下凡纳梅螺旋藻和卵形螺旋藻水体和肠道中细菌的丰度和多样性(P < 0.05)。单作模式下,凡纳梅乳杆菌与卵形乳杆菌肠道菌群结构差异不显著(P > 0.05)。两种培养模式下沉积物的优势门为变形菌门、拟杆菌门和绿菌门。在两种培养模式下,水和凡纳梅乳杆菌肠道内的微生物群落结构相似。优势门为蓝藻门、变形菌门和放线菌门,丰度在80.88% ~ 97.10%之间。变形菌门为各组样品的优势门,两种培养模式下的优势属均为GpIIa。两种培养方式下微生物群落结构差异不大;虽然培养方式对核心门/属没有影响,但相对丰度存在差异。实验结果为探索高效、特异的益生菌筛选和微生物配方技术提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Effects of replacing dietary fishmeal with zymolytic black soldier fly larvae on the growth performance of the mud crab (scylla paramamosain) larvae Using black soldier fly larvae as feed for Thai frog (Rana rugosa Temminck and Schlegel, 1838) – Preliminary study of the effect on production parameters Transcriptome analysis of the allometric growth of golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus) following soybean meal feed Efficacy of a formalin-inactivated vaccine against Lactococcus garvieae infection in golden pompano Trachinotus ovatus Chitosan Decelerates Melanosis in Shrimp: A Novel Technique for Visual Quality Assessment Using Digital Image Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1