Investigating the Effectiveness of Active and Passive Protection Methods in Reducing the Risk of Fire in Scientific-Research Laboratories of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2017

M. Feiz-Arefi, F. Rostami, A. Babaei-Pouya A, M. Mahdinia, A. Karami-Mosafer, M* Mirzaie Ali Abadi
{"title":"Investigating the Effectiveness of Active and Passive Protection Methods in Reducing the Risk of Fire in Scientific-Research Laboratories of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2017","authors":"M. Feiz-Arefi, F. Rostami, A. Babaei-Pouya A, M. Mahdinia, A. Karami-Mosafer, M* Mirzaie Ali Abadi","doi":"10.52547/j.health.12.3.358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & objectives: Research laboratories are important parts of universities. The risks and variety of laboratory activities have made the issue of fire protection one of the major safety challenges in the laboratory, and fire prevention is important to ensure the safety of people and equipment. Therefore, the present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of active and passive fire protection in scientific laboratories of Hamadan university of medical sciences. Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, the FRAME fire risk assessment method was used to assess the fire risk. Data were collected using a checklist and the resulting data was entered into the FRAME calculation program. First, the fire risk of buildings, people and laboratory activity were calculated and ranked according to the level of risk. The efficiency of active and passive protections available in laboratories was also evaluated. Results: The results showed that 63% of laboratories had inadequate protective equipment, and the calculated level of risk for staff in all laboratories is higher than 1. So, the existing protection facilities were not suitable to protect staff in all laboratories. The results related to fire risk of activity showed that only in 18 laboratories (39.13%), the existing protection facilities had good performance. Conclusion: Simultaneous use of active and passive protection is more effective in reducing risk. Due to the high risk of fire for people in all laboratories, it is recommended taking appropriate management measures to be prioritized by safety programs to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.","PeriodicalId":15954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/j.health.12.3.358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives: Research laboratories are important parts of universities. The risks and variety of laboratory activities have made the issue of fire protection one of the major safety challenges in the laboratory, and fire prevention is important to ensure the safety of people and equipment. Therefore, the present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of active and passive fire protection in scientific laboratories of Hamadan university of medical sciences. Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, the FRAME fire risk assessment method was used to assess the fire risk. Data were collected using a checklist and the resulting data was entered into the FRAME calculation program. First, the fire risk of buildings, people and laboratory activity were calculated and ranked according to the level of risk. The efficiency of active and passive protections available in laboratories was also evaluated. Results: The results showed that 63% of laboratories had inadequate protective equipment, and the calculated level of risk for staff in all laboratories is higher than 1. So, the existing protection facilities were not suitable to protect staff in all laboratories. The results related to fire risk of activity showed that only in 18 laboratories (39.13%), the existing protection facilities had good performance. Conclusion: Simultaneous use of active and passive protection is more effective in reducing risk. Due to the high risk of fire for people in all laboratories, it is recommended taking appropriate management measures to be prioritized by safety programs to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2017年哈马丹医科大学科研实验室主动与被动防护方法降低火灾风险的有效性研究
背景与目的:研究实验室是高校的重要组成部分。实验室活动的危险性和多样性使得消防问题成为实验室面临的主要安全挑战之一,而防火是保证人员和设备安全的重要手段。因此,本研究在哈马丹医学大学的科学实验室进行了主动和被动防火效果的评估。方法:本研究采用描述性分析方法,采用FRAME火灾风险评估法进行火灾风险评估。使用检查表收集数据,并将结果数据输入FRAME计算程序。首先,计算建筑物、人员和实验室活动的火灾风险,并根据风险等级进行排序。还评价了实验室中可用的主动和被动防护的效率。结果:63%的实验室防护装备不足,所有实验室工作人员的计算风险等级均大于1。因此,现有的防护设施并不适合对所有实验室的工作人员进行防护。活动火灾风险调查结果显示,仅有18个实验室(39.13%)现有防护设施性能较好。结论:主动防护与被动防护同时使用可有效降低风险。由于所有实验室人员的火灾风险很高,建议采取适当的管理措施,优先考虑安全计划,将风险降低到可接受的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the Health-promoting Lifestyle Status in Nursing Students of Ardabil School of Nursing and Midwifery 2019 Designing and Developing a Questionnaire to Evaluate the Lighting of the Working Environments of Hospitals Social Predictors of DMFT Index among Adults an Iranian Population in 2016: A Cross-Sectional Study Investigating the Efficiency of Different Steps of the Most Common Method for Disinfecting Vegetables to Reduce the Microbial Population Design and Validation of a Tool to Measure Universal Health Insurance Coverage in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1