Vaginal Mycoplasmataceae colonization and association with immune mediators in pregnancy

A. Wood, Michelle Tang, T. Truong, C. Feldman, C. Pieper, A. Murtha
{"title":"Vaginal Mycoplasmataceae colonization and association with immune mediators in pregnancy","authors":"A. Wood, Michelle Tang, T. Truong, C. Feldman, C. Pieper, A. Murtha","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2019.1663820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective To determine the prevalence of Mycoplasmataceae species in pregnant women and evaluate their association with immune system mediators. Methods Women were prospectively enrolled between 16–22 weeks’ gestation. Vaginal swabs were self-collected and analyzed with PCR for Mycoplasma hominis (MH) and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) as well as Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) and Ureaplasma parvum (UP) (collectively, Myc). Immune mediators were measured via Luminex multiplex assay. Women with vaginal Mycoplasmataceae were compared to women without Myc, and women with Mycoplasma species (MH or MG) were compared to women without MH or MG. Linear regression models were used to investigate the relationship of the presence of Mycoplasmataceae on log-transformed immune mediators while controlling for confounders using propensity scores. Results One-hundred-twenty women were enrolled and had complete lab data available. Colonization was 20.8, 2.5, 10.0, and 48.3% for MH, MG, UU, and UP, respectively. Women with any Mycoplasmataceae were more likely to be younger, of the Black race, and have public insurance. There were no significant differences in immune mediators between women with vaginal Mycoplasmataceae versus those without. After controlling for confounders, women with MH and/or MG had significantly elevated levels of IL-1β compared to women without MH or MG (estimate =  1.12; 95% CI =  0.33, 1.93). There were no other significant differences in immune mediators in women with MH and/or MG compared to those without. Conclusions Colonization rates were highest for UP and lowest for MG. Higher IL-1β levels were seen in the presence of MH and/or MG, indicating that these less frequently encountered organisms may incite a stronger host response. There were no other significant differences in immune mediator levels.","PeriodicalId":22921,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"2295 - 2302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1663820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Objective To determine the prevalence of Mycoplasmataceae species in pregnant women and evaluate their association with immune system mediators. Methods Women were prospectively enrolled between 16–22 weeks’ gestation. Vaginal swabs were self-collected and analyzed with PCR for Mycoplasma hominis (MH) and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) as well as Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) and Ureaplasma parvum (UP) (collectively, Myc). Immune mediators were measured via Luminex multiplex assay. Women with vaginal Mycoplasmataceae were compared to women without Myc, and women with Mycoplasma species (MH or MG) were compared to women without MH or MG. Linear regression models were used to investigate the relationship of the presence of Mycoplasmataceae on log-transformed immune mediators while controlling for confounders using propensity scores. Results One-hundred-twenty women were enrolled and had complete lab data available. Colonization was 20.8, 2.5, 10.0, and 48.3% for MH, MG, UU, and UP, respectively. Women with any Mycoplasmataceae were more likely to be younger, of the Black race, and have public insurance. There were no significant differences in immune mediators between women with vaginal Mycoplasmataceae versus those without. After controlling for confounders, women with MH and/or MG had significantly elevated levels of IL-1β compared to women without MH or MG (estimate =  1.12; 95% CI =  0.33, 1.93). There were no other significant differences in immune mediators in women with MH and/or MG compared to those without. Conclusions Colonization rates were highest for UP and lowest for MG. Higher IL-1β levels were seen in the presence of MH and/or MG, indicating that these less frequently encountered organisms may incite a stronger host response. There were no other significant differences in immune mediator levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴道支原体科定植及其与妊娠免疫介质的关联
摘要目的了解孕妇支原体科菌的流行情况,并探讨其与免疫系统介质的关系。方法前瞻性纳入妊娠16-22周的妇女。自行采集阴道拭子,用PCR检测人支原体(MH)、生殖支原体(MG)、解脲支原体(UU)和细小脲原体(UP) (Myc)。免疫介质通过Luminex多重试验测定。阴道支原体科的妇女与没有Myc的妇女进行比较,支原体种类(MH或MG)的妇女与没有MH或MG的妇女进行比较。使用线性回归模型来研究支原体科在对数转化免疫介质上存在的关系,同时使用倾向评分控制混杂因素。结果120名妇女入选,有完整的实验室资料。MH、MG、UU和UP的定殖率分别为20.8%、2.5%、10.0%和48.3%。患有支原体科的女性更有可能是年轻的黑人,并且有公共保险。阴道支原体科感染的女性与未感染支原体科的女性在免疫介质方面没有显著差异。在控制混杂因素后,与没有MH和/或MG的女性相比,患有MH和/或MG的女性IL-1β水平显著升高(估计= 1.12;95% ci = 0.33, 1.93)。与未患MH和/或MG的妇女相比,患有MH和/或MG的妇女的免疫介质没有其他显著差异。结论UP菌定植率最高,MG菌定植率最低。在MH和/或MG存在的情况下,IL-1β水平升高,表明这些不太常见的生物可能会引发更强的宿主反应。在免疫介质水平上没有其他显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of specialty training and physician attitudes on fetal cardiac counseling Fetoplacental unit involvement in uric acid production in women with severe preeclampsia: a prospective case control pilot study. Causal association of sex hormone-binding globulin on gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study Targeted metabolomic analysis of early-trimester serum identifies potential mechanisms for late-onset preeclampsia Statement of retraction: effect of daily consumption of probiotic yoghurt on lipid profiles in pregnant women: a randomized controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1