Primary care in Caribbean Small Island Developing States

J. Kranenburg
{"title":"Primary care in Caribbean Small Island Developing States","authors":"J. Kranenburg","doi":"10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-MED.AVUQD7.V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caribbean Small Island Developing States (SIDS) made good process on improving the health of their populations; but concerns exist when it comes to meeting changing health needs. Due to remoteness and limited resources it is difficult to respond to high rates of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Furthermore, little is known about how primary care (PC) is organised and how this responds to current health issues. This study focused on gaining insights in the organisation of PC of Caribbean SIDS based on currently available literature. This literature review was an explorative multiple case study, where structure of PC and health status of 16 Caribbean SIDS were reviewed using available scientific and grey literature between the years 1997 and 2014. Thirty documents were used to analyse 20 indicators for the dimensions “Structure of Primary Care” and “Health Status”. Results were mapped in order to identify if there is a possible relation between structures of PC to the health of the populations. When reviewing the structure of PC, the majority of information was available for “Economic conditions of PC” (78%) and the least information was available for “Governance of PC” (40%). With regards to health status, all islands show improvements on “Life expectancy at birth” since 2007. In contrast, on average, the mortality due to NCDs did not improve. Saint Lucia performs best on “Structure of PC”. The British Virgin Islands have the best health status. When both dimensions were analysed, Saint Lucia performs best. There is still little known on the responsiveness of PC of Caribbean SIDS to NCDs. There is a need for elaborate research on: (1) If and how the functioning of these health systems relate to the health status; (2) What islands can learn from an analysis over time and what they can learn from cross-island analysis; and (3) Filling the gaps of knowledge which currently exist within this field of research. INTRODUCTION Small Island Developing States (SIDS) made good progress in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). However, concerns exist regarding the health of the population of these islands, in particular, the Caribbean SIDS, who have transitioned from high communicable diseases region to an increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The prevalence of obesity in the Caribbean is amongst the highest of the world [1, 2]. The five-year evaluation of the Mauritius Strategy of Implementation (MSI+5) for the Caribbean showed that health standards have worsened for NCDs. Patients complain about the deterioration of quality of health services and there is an inability of health administrations to respond to changing needs of patients [1, 2]. In addition, health systems of SIDS face the persistent challenge of limited capacity and skills of health care workers due to emigration, the remoteness, the size and the economic opportunities [1–6]. Health is not solely evaluated within in the MSI and MSI+5. Health system performance and health are assessed and monitored by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). PAHO attempts to regionally strengthen health systems of Latin American Countries by assessing Essential Public Health functions and reporting health system performance with the publications of “Health in the Americas” reports [2, 7, 8]. Even though health care systems are assessed regularly, little scientific research was done on the factual organisation and its relation to the health. It is of importance to find out to what extent reforms need to be done in the organisation to meet the “new” needs of the populations. When it comes to the response of prevention and treatment of NCDs, primary care (PC) is the first point of contact. Therefore it plays a pivotal role in the health care system [9–11]. For SIDS a good and efficient organisation of PC is even more so important due to the remoteness and limited resources [1, 12]. SOR-MED","PeriodicalId":91169,"journal":{"name":"ScienceOpen research","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ScienceOpen research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-MED.AVUQD7.V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Caribbean Small Island Developing States (SIDS) made good process on improving the health of their populations; but concerns exist when it comes to meeting changing health needs. Due to remoteness and limited resources it is difficult to respond to high rates of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Furthermore, little is known about how primary care (PC) is organised and how this responds to current health issues. This study focused on gaining insights in the organisation of PC of Caribbean SIDS based on currently available literature. This literature review was an explorative multiple case study, where structure of PC and health status of 16 Caribbean SIDS were reviewed using available scientific and grey literature between the years 1997 and 2014. Thirty documents were used to analyse 20 indicators for the dimensions “Structure of Primary Care” and “Health Status”. Results were mapped in order to identify if there is a possible relation between structures of PC to the health of the populations. When reviewing the structure of PC, the majority of information was available for “Economic conditions of PC” (78%) and the least information was available for “Governance of PC” (40%). With regards to health status, all islands show improvements on “Life expectancy at birth” since 2007. In contrast, on average, the mortality due to NCDs did not improve. Saint Lucia performs best on “Structure of PC”. The British Virgin Islands have the best health status. When both dimensions were analysed, Saint Lucia performs best. There is still little known on the responsiveness of PC of Caribbean SIDS to NCDs. There is a need for elaborate research on: (1) If and how the functioning of these health systems relate to the health status; (2) What islands can learn from an analysis over time and what they can learn from cross-island analysis; and (3) Filling the gaps of knowledge which currently exist within this field of research. INTRODUCTION Small Island Developing States (SIDS) made good progress in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). However, concerns exist regarding the health of the population of these islands, in particular, the Caribbean SIDS, who have transitioned from high communicable diseases region to an increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The prevalence of obesity in the Caribbean is amongst the highest of the world [1, 2]. The five-year evaluation of the Mauritius Strategy of Implementation (MSI+5) for the Caribbean showed that health standards have worsened for NCDs. Patients complain about the deterioration of quality of health services and there is an inability of health administrations to respond to changing needs of patients [1, 2]. In addition, health systems of SIDS face the persistent challenge of limited capacity and skills of health care workers due to emigration, the remoteness, the size and the economic opportunities [1–6]. Health is not solely evaluated within in the MSI and MSI+5. Health system performance and health are assessed and monitored by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). PAHO attempts to regionally strengthen health systems of Latin American Countries by assessing Essential Public Health functions and reporting health system performance with the publications of “Health in the Americas” reports [2, 7, 8]. Even though health care systems are assessed regularly, little scientific research was done on the factual organisation and its relation to the health. It is of importance to find out to what extent reforms need to be done in the organisation to meet the “new” needs of the populations. When it comes to the response of prevention and treatment of NCDs, primary care (PC) is the first point of contact. Therefore it plays a pivotal role in the health care system [9–11]. For SIDS a good and efficient organisation of PC is even more so important due to the remoteness and limited resources [1, 12]. SOR-MED
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加勒比小岛屿发展中国家的初级保健
加勒比小岛屿发展中国家在改善其人口健康方面取得了良好进展;但是,在满足不断变化的卫生需求方面存在担忧。由于地处偏远和资源有限,很难对非传染性疾病的高发率作出反应。此外,人们对初级保健(PC)是如何组织的以及它如何应对当前的健康问题知之甚少。这项研究的重点是在现有文献的基础上对加勒比小岛屿发展中国家的PC组织进行深入了解。本次文献审查是一项探索性多案例研究,利用1997年至2014年之间的现有科学文献和灰色文献,审查了16个加勒比小岛屿发展中国家的人口出生率结构和健康状况。使用了30份文件来分析"初级保健结构"和"健康状况"方面的20个指标。将结果绘制成地图,以确定PC结构与人群健康之间是否存在可能的关系。在审查个人电脑结构时,“个人电脑经济状况”的信息最多(78%),“个人电脑治理”的信息最少(40%)。关于健康状况,自2007年以来,所有岛屿的"出生时预期寿命"都有所改善。相比之下,非传染性疾病造成的死亡率平均没有改善。圣卢西亚在“PC结构”上表现最好。英属维尔京群岛的健康状况最好。在这两个方面进行分析时,圣卢西亚表现最好。关于加勒比小岛屿发展中国家对非传染性疾病的反应仍然知之甚少。有必要详细研究:(1)这些卫生系统的运作是否与健康状况有关,以及如何与健康状况有关;(2)岛屿可以从一段时间的分析中学到什么,它们可以从跨岛屿分析中学到什么;(3)填补这一研究领域目前存在的知识空白。小岛屿发展中国家在实现千年发展目标方面取得了良好进展。然而,人们对这些岛屿,特别是加勒比小岛屿发展中国家人口的健康感到关切,这些岛屿已从传染病高发区域过渡到非传染性疾病日益流行的区域。加勒比地区的肥胖患病率是世界上最高的[1,2]。对加勒比地区毛里求斯实施战略(MSI+5)的五年评价表明,非传染性疾病的卫生标准已经恶化。患者抱怨卫生服务质量下降,卫生管理部门无法对患者不断变化的需求作出反应[1,2]。此外,由于移民、偏远、规模和经济机会,小岛屿发展中国家的卫生系统面临着卫生保健工作者能力和技能有限的持续挑战[1-6]。健康不只是在MSI和MSI+5范围内进行评估。卫生系统的绩效和健康由泛美卫生组织(PAHO)进行评估和监测。泛美卫生组织试图通过“美洲卫生”报告的出版物评估基本公共卫生职能和报告卫生系统绩效,从而在区域上加强拉丁美洲国家的卫生系统[2,7,8]。尽管对卫生保健系统进行定期评估,但对事实组织及其与健康的关系进行的科学研究很少。重要的是要弄清楚该组织需要在多大程度上进行改革,以满足人口的“新”需求。在预防和治疗非传染性疾病的反应方面,初级保健是第一个接触点。因此,它在医疗保健系统中起着举足轻重的作用[9-11]。对于小岛屿发展中国家来说,由于地处偏远和资源有限,良好和有效的PC组织更加重要[1,12]。SOR-MED
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊最新文献
A review: CRISPR/Cas12-mediated genome editing in fungal cells: advancements, mechanisms, and future directions in plant-fungal pathology Psychosocial risks in the working environment – approaches to formative risk assessment Technological, legal, and sociological summary of biometric technology usage Policy learning from influenza and the preparedness of the public health sector: 2006/2007 influenza season in Latvia Mpemba Effect- the Effect of Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1