Comparison of the Effects of Conventional Physical Therapy Versus Progressive Overload Training in Patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome; A Randomised Clinical Trial
M. Qamar, Ayesha Basharat, Qurba Kiran, A. Nazir, Waqas Ahmad, Shahnai Basharat
{"title":"Comparison of the Effects of Conventional Physical Therapy Versus Progressive Overload Training in Patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome; A Randomised Clinical Trial","authors":"M. Qamar, Ayesha Basharat, Qurba Kiran, A. Nazir, Waqas Ahmad, Shahnai Basharat","doi":"10.21649/akemu.v29i1.5395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Rotator cuff tendinitis and shoulder impingement are regarded as the frequent intrinsic reasons for shoulder discomfort and disability. Objective: A study was conducted to compare the effects of conventional physical therapy and progressive overload training in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. Methods: Thirty patients with shoulder impingement syndrome were included. These patients were randomised into two groups. One group received structured, progressive resistance training, and the other received conventional therapy. The intervention group participants participated in progressive resistance training three days per week for six weeks. The numeric pain rating scale was used to assess pain intensity and the range of motion measured by the goniometer. The statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), version 21 for Windows, was used for data analysis. An independent t-test was used to compare the effects between the two groups. Result: Out of 30 participants, there were twenty-four females and six males. The mean age of the participants was 44±5.1 years. Participants from the intervention group had better pain control (P < 0.05) and improved range of motion (P < 0.05) compared to the control group. Conclusion: We conclude in this group of patients, progressive overload training was more effective in alleviating pain and improving the range of motion in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.","PeriodicalId":43918,"journal":{"name":"Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan","volume":"1997 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v29i1.5395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Background: Rotator cuff tendinitis and shoulder impingement are regarded as the frequent intrinsic reasons for shoulder discomfort and disability. Objective: A study was conducted to compare the effects of conventional physical therapy and progressive overload training in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. Methods: Thirty patients with shoulder impingement syndrome were included. These patients were randomised into two groups. One group received structured, progressive resistance training, and the other received conventional therapy. The intervention group participants participated in progressive resistance training three days per week for six weeks. The numeric pain rating scale was used to assess pain intensity and the range of motion measured by the goniometer. The statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), version 21 for Windows, was used for data analysis. An independent t-test was used to compare the effects between the two groups. Result: Out of 30 participants, there were twenty-four females and six males. The mean age of the participants was 44±5.1 years. Participants from the intervention group had better pain control (P < 0.05) and improved range of motion (P < 0.05) compared to the control group. Conclusion: We conclude in this group of patients, progressive overload training was more effective in alleviating pain and improving the range of motion in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.
摘要背景:肩袖肌腱炎和肩部撞击被认为是导致肩部不适和残疾的常见内在原因。目的:比较常规物理治疗与进行性负荷训练对肩撞击综合征患者的治疗效果。方法:选取30例肩撞击综合征患者。这些患者被随机分为两组。一组接受有组织的渐进式阻力训练,另一组接受常规治疗。干预组的参与者参加了为期六周的渐进式阻力训练,每周三天。数值疼痛评定量表用于评估疼痛强度和关节计测量的活动范围。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS), version 21 for Windows,进行数据分析。采用独立t检验比较两组间的效果。结果:30名参与者中,女性24人,男性6人。参与者平均年龄44±5.1岁。与对照组相比,干预组患者疼痛控制性较好(P < 0.05),活动度改善(P < 0.05)。结论:在本组患者中,渐进式负荷训练能更有效地缓解肩撞击综合征患者的疼痛并改善其活动范围。